Why shd i relook my attitude of being a corporal when i done nothing to deserve the rank? I didnt attend SiSpec nor was i a section 2IC. It given to everyone and i mean everyone in the battalion as long as completed air level or diploma. If i am in army to promote due to merit of course i will be proud of being a corporal but the fact saf give promotion based on length of service and education level. Tiew, smlj army is this?
As for my attitude toward NS, i dont think anyone can fault me. I never keng and i never defer. I done almost every role that a rifleman do in a section. I been a GPMG gunner whenever the regular guy unavailable and even been a PC runner even thou i dunno shit abt the manpack.
Compentent officers are far and few between. Dont expect anything good to come out of 9 mths course. Nine months are way too short to train a proper officer. When i say competent, i am not saying he welfare or not but how he do on the field. I can accept CB langs as an officer but cannot tahan idiot who gabra in the field, bring the men to holland then blame everything on the men when he kenna fark by CO. Nothing piss me off than having to do everything again because the OC or PC not up th scratch. It us pengkias who had to suffer in the rain at deployment while the OCs, S1234 and CO having outside food brought by their rover drivers shelter in the tentage. KNN, want to do this also dont do it in front of the men.
Dont throw me a name colonel whatisname and give me BS story he a soldier dream leader. I completed my reservist and only my reservist PC earn my respect and i told him it had been a privilage to have serve under him when the battalion stand down. He never give orders that he himself wont do, take point himself and even carry the manpack himself when the runner cannot tahan the exhaustion. Btw, he too kenna screwed by S1 when he was ask to come back by OC to lead the platoon in the field even thou he already deferred. Why he ask to come back it because the other two full lefts are useless and cannot be count on. That why my platoon is always the point platoon even thou platoon had only 9 riflemen. he came back for six days, went thru a farking siong 4 days field excerise and was given only low key ict by the s1. Just one lousy day and considering he come back voluntary, make exception lah. So he LL post to brigade while we MR becuase he owe a high key, so farking unfair. Then also, some of men also volunteer to attend a one month motorbike course which shd be consider high key but in the end also no count. There also quite a few men never receive their 5yr or 10yr award even thou completed reservist cycle, dont even get the watch because s1 branch said their docket missing.
So whether u sibeh good s1 or not, only u know. My experience of both active and reservist s1 are lousy. My opinions are based on my own experience. As for tpl good mp or not, i dont know and i dont care as she not my mp.
I can see why your NS experience was disappointing. I fully sympathise with you. In fact I would consider it a privilege to have men like yourself in my branch or platoon. As a battalion S1 I would also consider it a privilege to have people like your PC under my command.
Your PC was indeed treated unfairly by both his S1 and his CO. Sadly, cases like that are common in SAF. That does not mean that all officers are incompetent. There are certainly other officers like your PC. I would not dare say I am one of them. Only my men can be the judge of that.
However, just because others are lousy does not mean that one cannot aspire to be different. You might have had to serve in a poorly-managed unit, with poor administration and incompetent officers, but you could still have made a choice to be an outstanding and exemplary Corporal (even though you did not ask for that promotion). Everyone has that choice. I too have encountered horrible commanders and horrible soldiers. That does not mean that I have to be like them.
During my NSF days I was a DYS1. One day, a PC (who was a regular Captain) came to look for me and asked me to look into a case. One of his men had actually passed his IPPT before enlisting, which entitled him to a 2-month reduction in his NSF service. However, somehow SAF overlooked it due to an administrative lapse. The PC told me that this guy had to go through PTP and BMT as he was classified as having to serve 2 years 6 months. He asked me if there was any chance that he could have a 2-month reduction applied retrospectively, by having my unit appeal to MINDEF and highlight the administrative lapse.
I told him that I would do everything possible to fight for this serviceman. I also admired his sincerity and determination in standing up for his servicemen. I could tell that he was totally sincere.
When my S1 (my boss) returned to the office, I brought up this case and asked him if anything could be done. He simply replied me in a dismissive tone, saying "Brandon, why you care so much about such issues? Can't you see I am busy?? Don't bother me la."
The next day, I brought up the issue again and he sternly informed me that he did not wish to be bothered by this as he was undergoing alot of stress from an upcoming manpower audit. I was quite pissed off, but as an NSF, I did not think that it was appropriate for me to criticise him, so I backed down.
The following week, the PC came to see me and asked about the situation. I frankly told him what had happened, and he was very disappointed. In fact, I could tell that he was close to tears!! He cared deeply about his serviceman and truly felt that this was an injustice. He appealed to me to confront the S1, and told me that he would accompany me if I was scared. Since they were both Captains, they hung out together at the mess and knew each other better, but he also needed me present as I knew about MINDEF manpower procedures better than him despite being a mere NSF 2LT.
Before that happened, I personally went up to the S1 to highlight the issue again. The S1 started to whine and bitch to the whole office, in front of around 10 clerks, 1 chief clerk, 1 project officer and 2 specs. He went on and on about how busy he was, how the manpower audit was fucked up, and asked me why the hell I care so much since I am only an NSF, about to ORD in less than 8 months time, and moreover I didn't even know that LCP that had this issue. He said that its people like me who create unnecessary work for everyone else to do. The rest of the clerks looked at me with anger and started to mutter amongst themselves that I was creating extra work. They supported the S1 and saw him as providing "welfare" i.e. trying to reduce the overall workload of the branch.
The next day, I called up MINDEF and attempted to deal with this issue on my own, but the person who answered my call (a Major) told me that the "records in the system" show that the LCP did not pass his IPPT prior to enlistment, and that he was rightfully required to serve 2 years 6 months. That was the end of it because the "system" said so. He then went on to explain to me the rules governing PTP and the 2-month reduction (which I already knew), and then explained that the "regulations and protocols are clear". Then he hung up and that was the end of the matter.
I ended up going to see this PC and personally apologising to him. He understood, and told me not to feel too bad about it. He said I had tried my best so there was no need to feel guilty. To this day I remain upset about this, even though it happened nearly 15 years ago.
So as you can see, things are not so easy.
If you were the LCP who had to do the extra 2 months, you would think the entire S1 branch is fucked up.
If you were the S1 branch clerks, you would think that your DYS1 is fucked up.
There are different sides to every issue, so try to see both sides before condemning people. Sometimes, things are just fucked up, but it doesn't mean that you shouldn't do your best. As a corporal I think you could have done your best despite all the shit that went on around you. I'm not criticising you, just trying to offer a balanced view.