The Best Way to Deal with GOH MENG SENG

[GoldenDragon]

We have not seen the best of Goh Meng Seng.

More like the worse has yet to come.

 

[jw5]

Aiyah let him be lah. Btw come 2016, do you all think GMS will contest?

I think he will contest the next GE.
He will also continue to whack the elected opposition MPs online until around 2015.
Then he will tone down so that he will not lose opposition supporters' votes.

 

[wikiphile]

I think he will contest the next GE.
He will also continue to whack the elected opposition MPs online until around 2015.
Then he will tone down so that he will not lose opposition supporters' votes.

In that case i would rather vote for tin pei ling than for him, while i try to be conscious of this nation's need for stronger alternative voices in parliament, i have a bigger beef with him than the men in white.

 

[Leongsam]

One "insect" one vote.
One "brilliant economist cum wannabe statesman" also one vote.

The term "insect" is too polite a term to describe some of the nut cases we have here.

 

[Fook Seng]

One "insect" one vote.
One "brilliant economist cum wannabe statesman" also one vote.

In the Insect Hive, all insects are equal but some are more equal than others.

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

In the Insect Hive, all insects are equal but some are more equal than others.

Goh Meng Seng calls us insects.

Lee Kuan Yew calls us ants.

I don't see any discernible difference between these two.

 

[zhihau]

I don't see any discernible difference between these two.

one is a subset of the other?

 

[Fook Seng]

Goh Meng Seng calls us insects.

Lee Kuan Yew calls us ants.

I don't see any discernible difference between these two.

One is the Napolean class. The other is just Benjamin class in the Hive.

 

[Sadist]

The term "insect" is too polite a term to describe some of the nut cases we have here.

Precisely.

Goh Meng Seng and Dr Chee are the most abuse opposition members here. By who? Of course they are mostly WP members and their clones. Even TR is not spare. They can gang up all they want and systematic attack or put down all those who are not with WP or have the slightess hint of showing displeasure for WP.

In my little less then 10 posts here, I have already given 5 infrations, that shows that they don't even have the balls to let you debate.

WP members here are cowards and behave like a bunch of hooligans. Just like YAW that duck like a tortise.

 

[brocoli]

I really admire Goh Meng Seng. I'm thinking of creating a special section in this forum for him to share his wisdom.

Goh Meng Seng is an unapologetic dye in the wool red Socialist with a capital S !!!

this is what he say :

TOC: But the PAP believes that their policies are beneficial to the people.

Goh Meng Seng: Well that’s what they think. It’s my job to point out the fallacies of that. There’re no perfect policies, but it’s how you view the tradeoffs. There will always be tradeoffs And how you view the necessity to take care of the vulnerable.

People say, “They are lazy, they deserve it.” Socialist perspective will go deep down and look at the nature of the system that groom this group of people. For example – ultra capitalist system based on meritocracy, so to speak. When everybody is on the same level, and you study hard and you grow, yes, those who are less hardworking in studies will fall apart. But this is not all. It’s not over one generation. Second generation, those who are less well-off, have less resources to groom their own children while the rich will have lots of resources. So the extreme will form. The rich will always be on top. The poor will always be poor due to the nature of endowment.




http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/10/unapologetically-socialist-goh-meng-seng-part-one/
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/10/unapologetically-socialist-goh-meng-seng-part-two/

A loser is one who expects others to fund his/her existence. If Goh Meng Seng expects the govt to give him a handout, then he's a loser. If he's financially independent, then he's a winner.

he expect the govt to fund everything

GMS expect govt to house every1 !!!
http://www.sgpolitics.net/?p=4452

The first question asked was whether HDB should be privatized. My first response is that it should not. HDB is part of a socialist Land Reform program.

http://singaporealternatives.blogspot.com/2011/04/back-to-fundamentals.html

PAP has lost its socialist roots along the way and now, it has lost the political moral high ground to talk about fundamentals.

can you reconcile this ???

you really are a SOCIALIST FRONT MOLE huh ??? but if Goh Meng Seng is a PAP mole, how come you are supporting him as a SOCIALIST FRONT MOLE ???

now I am confused!!!

 

[Leongsam]

but if Goh Meng Seng is a PAP mole, how come you are supporting him as a SOCIALIST FRONT MOLE ???

now I am confused!!!

There is a big difference between admiring someone and supporting their policies. I'm pretty much against everything Goh Meng Seng stands for. However, I am an admirer of his courage and determination.

 

[eatshitndie]

There is a big difference between admiring someone and supporting their policies. I'm pretty much against everything Goh Meng Seng stands for. However, I am an admirer of his courage and determination.

fact#1: he has more balls and testosterones than most forumers here. fact#2: fact#1 is a reason why his pants are large, saggy and emanating odor of manhood.

 

[Fook Seng]

fact#1: he has more balls and testosterones than most forumers here. fact#2: fact#1 is a reason why his pants are large, saggy and emanating odor of manhood.

Fact#1 is amply illustrated by the circumstances he sold his flat.

 

[Sadist]

Another 3 infrations received this morning plus 1 positive making a total of 8 negatives.

It just shows there are lots of WP wimps in this forum. My advice to those of you who gag me, please join the school of pussies, if you are unable to accept alternative view, politics is not for you.

 

[BlueWave]

you guys give gms far too much credit for selling his house to finance his political pursue.

if he is any good financially or brainwise he wouldn't need to be selling his house in order to get some $$ to finance his GE adventure. anyway how can anyone be sure that he uses all the $$ he got from selling his house for GE only? maybe he uses some to settle his debts or buy some fancy stuff or pay for his sex romps?

i am not saying he cannot do this as afterall it is his own $$. i am saying it is too simplistic to assume that he has spend the $$ he has gotten from selling his house in GE only and nothing else.

dont make it sound like gms is so noble. he is in many ways worse than MIW.

 

[borom]

At least GMS has the guts to openly stand up against the PAP-compared to most silliporeans who grumble and take no action.
All of us are entitled to our opinions .For those who make personal attacks , do you have the balls to reveal your identity like GMS did in all his postings?

 

[Goh Meng Seng]

I guess you have rather low esteem. I never name any nicks, least anyone here as insects. If you feel that the insect is in you, that's just too bad.

Goh Meng Seng

Goh Meng Seng calls us insects.

Lee Kuan Yew calls us ants.

I don't see any discernible difference between these two.

 

[Bigfuck]

Goh Meng Seng calls us insects.

Lee Kuan Yew calls us ants.

I don't see any discernible difference between these two.

Bro, you ain't dumb. And you should never bother with superstitious people who do not understand science and the Universe. I have known this for a long time, but let someone else write it for me. The best part of you could have originated from insect DNA and those who feel so superior about themselves could come more from homo erectus defective DNA. Hey, the cockroach can survive a nuclear holocaust. Pure human genes cannot.

http://www.popsci.com/science/artic...ntal-dna-swapping-between-insects-and-mammals

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Bro, you ain't dumb. And you should never bother with superstitious people who do not understand science and the Universe. I have known this for a long time, but let someone else write it for me. The best part of you could have originated from insect DNA and those who feel so superior about themselves could come more from homo erectus defective DNA. Hey, the cockroach can survive a nuclear holocaust. Pure human genes cannot.

http://www.popsci.com/science/artic...ntal-dna-swapping-between-insects-and-mammals

I am not bothered by superstitious people, but only by people wearing the "scientist" label who apparently don't know what their discipline is or how to protect its integrity. The number of so-called "scientists" who have invoked the supernatural and then proceeded to write New York Times bestsellers whenever they lost the ability to grapple with the fast-paced development in quantum mechanics, microbiology, astrophysics, or particle physics, is rather sad.

The same goes for economists. There is one 2nd upper NUS econs grad here who does not understand even the basics but who goes around polluting the forum. He's spent a decade in politics, and thinks the term "insects" should be used to describe his former comrades. I wonder if he's a vertebrate as he not does appear to have any backbone whatsoever. Like all those creationists who indulge in flying spaghetti monsters http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=...jrAfgrfzSDA&ved=0CBoQBSgA&q=spaghetti&spell=1he will not hesitate to drag any discussion down with circular logic, lopsided analysis and personal emotional bias.

As I've said, the kindest term for him is "asinine fatuity".

 

[Bigfuck]

I am not bothered by superstitious people, but only by people wearing the "scientist" label who apparently don't know what their discipline is or how to protect its integrity. The number of so-called "scientists" who have invoked the supernatural and then proceeded to write New York Times bestsellers whenever they lost the ability to grapple with the fast-paced development in quantum mechanics, microbiology, astrophysics, or particle physics, is rather sad.

The same goes for economists. There is one 2nd upper NUS econs grad here who does not understand even the basics but who goes around polluting the forum. He's spent a decade in politics, and thinks the term "insects" should be used to describe his former comrades. I wonder if he's a vertebrate as he not does appear to have any backbone whatsoever. Like all those creationists who indulge in flying spaghetti monsters http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=...jrAfgrfzSDA&ved=0CBoQBSgA&q=spaghetti&spell=1he will not hesitate to drag any discussion down with circular logic, lopsided analysis and personal emotional bias.

As I've said, the kindest term for him is "asinine fatuity".

Relax bro> Let no insect be harmed in the process of this flaming. No bee means no pollination for some plants. I respect the importance of insects