The Best Way to Deal with GOH MENG SENG

[Perspective]

Like all those creationists who indulge in flying spaghetti monsters

Hey! Sorry I have an issue with that, but this is not the religion section

 

[zhihau]

indulge in flying spaghetti monsters

bro,

you subscribe to Prof Richard Dawkins?

 

[I_Hate_Pappies]

Another 3 infrations received this morning plus 1 positive making a total of 8 negatives.

It just shows there are lots of WP wimps in this forum. My advice to those of you who gag me, please join the school of pussies, if you are unable to accept alternative view, politics is not for you.

You know what happen when Indians count grapes? Keling kia sen pu tol, lu sen lu boh! See! 1 more grape gone!

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

bro,

you subscribe to Prof Richard Dawkins?

Well I am not familiar with his work, although I think his selfish gene and extended phenotype theories can be quite controversial at times. Anyway my view that scientists should not ask about the supernatural, should not invoke the supernatural when they have unexplained theories, and should always bear in mind Occam's Razor. In the religious folder, I stated my view that science and religion belong to totally distinct domains with disjoint and irreconcilable ways of defining, studying and comprehending the universe, and as such each has no business talking about the other at all.