Search results

http://statestimesreview.com/2015/07/18/pap-mp-lam-pin-min-doesnt-know-singapore-flag-should-not-touch-the-ground/ The MP for Sengkang West SMC Lam Pin Min is apparently unaware that the Singapore national flag should not touch the ground as he finds nothing wrong with a photo of a string of...

Shockingly dreadful condition of kids playground in Tampines north smacked right in the backyard of Tampines MP/Town Council Chairman Baey Yam Keng's constituency. Ironically dis kids playground is right in front of the foodcourt where Baey holds his monthly "kopitalk" :rolleyes: Wonder how he...

He should just focus on the party's talking points, and stop shooting himself in the foot. What seems to be clear-cut victory for WP may turn out to be an upset if Png and the party's leaders continue to mishandle their campaign. The margin is very much narrower than initially anticipated...

Had lunch with a group of Hougang residents whom I have known for many years. From their conversation, the ground may not as sweet as in the last GE, but WP are expected to win unless there is a big screw-up from now till polling day. Desmond Choo - after declaring "I am my own man", many are...

As I have said earlier, he should prove his worth by standing for Hougang by-election against WP.

This is a case of someone who is suffering from severe narcissistic personality disorder: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder 1. Tends to exaggerate their own importance, achievements, and talents - "I am as principled as before" 2. Reacts to criticism with...

Is that what he meant by his principles? :rolleyes:

Since Goh Meng Seng claims that WP as a party has lost their moral authority, will he then put his money where his mouth is and stand for Hougang by-election?

You do not know your accuser? Did you not said that you knew him?

There are also accusations that you had a mistress. Did you try suing your accuser? Similar logic.

If any "political analyst" wannabe can make all sorts of wide accusations and smear whoever he wants without having to substantiate for what he said, is that the kind of "democracy" he is epousing?

It is more than that, he called Pritam a plagiarizer, which means Pritam is a cheat. That is a serious charge.

Why are you bringing in YSL case here? The topic is on you accusing Pritam of plagiarism. I am just asking you to substantiate your accusation with a simple question. If you cannot substantiate, then you are smearing him, period.

It will do you more good if you can stop your name callings. I am merely asking you to substantiate you accusation, but so far you remain evasive and deceitful.

I have crossed sword with him in Facebook on "integrity". In the end he resort to name callings and start insinuating that I am a WP member. :D

Presumed means it is a matter of judgement. You just pwned yourself. ;)

Did Pritam expressly state that it is his idea? Yes or No? If you are arguing on implication, then I would counter with discretionary interpretation. If it is a matter of judgement call, then your plagiarism charge is not tenable, and your apology to Pritam is warranted, QED.

In this case, the rights remain with the author. If he permits reproduction of his work and waive the need for attribution, does the charge of plagiarism still stand? If it does, then are we stating that the author's right is limited, and he has no power to waive citation?

However, if I reproduced the work with the author's blessing that no citation is necessary, is that plagiarism? The option has been offered to Pritam and he had opted not to make any citiation. It is perfectly alright for anyone to opine that it is better to do than not, or that his idea is...

double post deleted