who has the absolute power and command over our armed forces? Isnt it our President?
our President is a lackey and relative of LKY. no difference lah.
who has the absolute power and command over our armed forces? Isnt it our President?
I present a quote from LKY himself:
“He took over, and he said: 'If I have to shoot 200,000 students to save China from another 100 years of disorder, so be it.'"
- Recalling how former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping dealt with the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests”
And this is what LKY thinks of elections:
“I ignore polling as a method of government. I think that shows a certain weakness of mind - an inability to chart a course whichever way the wind blows, whichever way the media encourages the people to go, you follow. If you can't force or are unwilling to force your people to follow you, with or without threats, you are not a leader.”
All of the above quotes are found in his books, The Singapore Story and From Third World To First.
I think he has made his stand clear. So let's stop speculating. Anyone who is claiming that the PAP will lose power in 2016 (or at any other time in the future) is being unrealistic.
i read with disbelief your assertion that your beloved PAP will never lose power. History has shown that regimes come and go. there will come a point in time when the populace will no longer put up with the oppression and a spark of revolt will be ignited.
Do you trust the men driving these equipment to fire upon command knowingly that they might be firing at their own brother, sister, father or son? If you look at China during the Tianaman incident the units that were sent in were not from that region but from far away that is why it took them sometime before they started rolling in the tanks and 2 unknown to most of the outside world there was another major unit standing by just incase the unit sent in decided to change colors.
I would stay behind to perform the unpleasant but necessary task of eliminating elements of the population who are trying to destabilise my country.
it is impossible for the whole sSAF to be mobilised unless it was announced several months before or even years. Second, the navy would play a minimal role unless they are bombarding coastal GRCs. RSAF? You cant take off a plane in Singapore without alerting Malaysia or Indonesia and violating their airspace.
Left the army. To crush a rebellion or the winners you need a good number of IFVs and leopard 2 tanks . Most are in Australia and that takes time to bring a good number back. Then you need to arm them- will you have sufficient pro lky followers to arm the tanks? How about troops? How many will be willing to kill own Singaporeans?
Whatever it takes.Will you have the keep to the armskote? What if you will have to kill you best friend or even family member?
Whatever it takes.
Whatever it takes.
I present a quote from LKY himself:
“He took over, and he said: 'If I have to shoot 200,000 students to save China from another 100 years of disorder, so be it.'"
- Recalling how former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping dealt with the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests”
And this is what LKY thinks of elections:
“I ignore polling as a method of government. I think that shows a certain weakness of mind - an inability to chart a course whichever way the wind blows, whichever way the media encourages the people to go, you follow. If you can't force or are unwilling to force your people to follow you, with or without threats, you are not a leader.”
All of the above quotes are found in his books, The Singapore Story and From Third World To First.
I think he has made his stand clear. So let's stop speculating. Anyone who is claiming that the PAP will lose power in 2016 (or at any other time in the future) is being unrealistic.
you are indeed cold hearted. I wouldn't want to be part of your family.
hahaha....obviously you are another scare monger or a retard....I think he has made his stand clear. So let's stop speculating. Anyone who is claiming that the PAP will lose power in 2016 (or at any other time in the future) is being unrealistic.
hahaha....obviously you are another scare monger or a retard....
first u quoted out of context and now u try to dig a deeper hole..
what is your motive here??
trying to scare pple into continuing voting for papee or for opps leaders to chicken out from taking part in GEs??
why don't you repeat the old grandmother story that voting slips are marked and those who voted for opps will be identified and persecuted!!!
u are another idiotic empty vessel.
I am not a scare mongerer, nor am I pro-LKY or pro-PAP. I am merely stating facts. Those who claim that the PAP can be overthrown are being unrealistic. Those who suggest that there could be a popular uprising (like the Arab Spring) to overthrow the PAP are being even more unrealistic.
(1) In the first place, what you need to understand is that this isn't about the PAP. It is not the PAP that has a stranglehold on power. It is an inner circle of private interest groups. Do you think the owners of Far East Organisation, Hong Leong Finance, OCBC etc are not within this inner circle that truly calls the shots? do you think that the PAP can simply make decisions without consulting these powerful families? At the same time, do you think that peripheral PAP leaders (who are not entrenched in this inner circle of oligarchs) have any real power? Guys like Lui Tuck Yew, Chan Chun Sing etc are clearly not part of this oligarch's circle. Who do you think has the real power? Why do you think the likes of LKY, LHL and so on always turn up to their 80th birthday celebrations? It was a known fact that LKY was and still is a very close personal friend of businessman Sudono Salim (also known as Liem Sioe Liang) who spends a lot of his time in Singapore and has substantial investments here.
Similarly, in other countries, who do you think has more power? The policy makers (including cabinet members) or elite business families like the Rothschilds??
(2) Given that the "elites" are so powerful, do you think they would happily accept a government that does not safeguard their interests? Why do you think the PAP, despite knowing that things must change, are working overtime to deliver just enough change to pacify the people while trying as far as possible to maintain the status quo?? If say the WP came into power, do you think they can stay in power by totally ignoring these elites and even going against them? Thaksin was popularly elected by the Thais, and he was a very powerful politician and businessman himself. But he offended the elite families, and look what happened?
In the USA, it does not matter whether the Democrats or Republicans are running the country -- they are still beholden to these interest groups in one way or another!! The likes of Halliburton, General Electric, AT&T etc will always be looked after no matter who is in power.
(3) What I am really saying is that those who think that true change in Singapore is coming are just setting themselves up for a huge disappointment. To put it simply, I have given up on Singapore, and I think the only logical course of action is to migrate overseas to a more egalitarian/meritocratic society like Australia or one of the Scandinavian countries.
There is the bigger conspiracy and the smaller one. We can't get rid of the bigger one without global revolutions of middle class hunting down the rich. But the latter one, we can do it rather easily with the emergence of people's power.
You seem to think that if the PAP is voted out, everything will change overnight.
Two points here:
(1) People don't seem to appreciate just how difficult it will be to vote out the PAP -- at the moment people think that the task is 50% complete, but in my view it is more like 5%. Moreover, voting them out does not mean that they will be out of power. There are many things they can do carry on in power.
(2) People also don't seem to appreciate that voting the PAP out is not going to change things substantially. OK, so the WP comes in and runs the government -- and then what? You think the wealthy landlords will suddenly lower rents and allow small businesses to thrive? You think GLCs will suddenly be divested and we will have competition in various industries? You think the culture of wayang and 'cover ups' in all organisations large and small will change, and we will suddenly have a culture of graciousness, responsibility and ownership? Well, think again..