scroobal, stop your filthy habit

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Made worst by the resident forum pest who spreads his petty personal vendetta in any thread that takes his fancy

wow lau ooi..

now got 3 threads talking about use of chinese/dialects..

is it necessary???

 

[char_jig_kar]

Made worst by the resident forum pest who spreads his petty personal vendetta in any thread that takes his fancy

harlo? its not personal vendetta. its a truly outrageous lie fabricated by scroobal. if he could fabricate such lie, what credibility he has then??? the main issue is not language here. the issue here is scroobal fabrication, turning and twisting, his outrageous lie.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Not necessarily true on all occasions Red Devil. At times when the argument reaches an impasse or say circular logic, then what is the point of continuing with more arguments? Best to leave it to the forumers to draw their own conclusions on such occasions.

let uncle teach you the art of persuasiveness,

Rule No.1 : Never say i will let the forummers decide, it translates to "I surrender, someone pls help me"

..

 

[char_jig_kar]

Not necessarily true on all occasions Red Devil. At times when the argument reaches an impasse or say circular logic, then what is the point of continuing with more arguments? Best to leave it to the forumers to draw their own conclusions on such occasions.

please show me any circular logic in my arguments.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Hello not you lah You are not as irritating as the resident forum pest whio crashes any thread that takes his fancy to spread his petty personal vendetta and invariably attracts the motley gang of nicks who strike back at him totally spoiling the thread for everyone else.

But then again when it comes to the mandarin language it appears that you take things too seriously and lack objectivity.

harlo? its not personal vendetta. its a truly outrageous lie fabricated by scroobal. .

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Again not you lah, just a general comment to the Red Devil

please show me any circular logic in my arguments.

 

[char_jig_kar]

Hello not you lah You are not as irritating as the resident forum pest whio crashes any thread that takes his fancy to spread his petty personal vendetta and invariably attracts the motley gang of nicks who strike back at him totally spoiling the thread for everyone else.

But then again when it comes to the mandarin language it appears that you take things too seriously and lack objectivity.

lacking objectivity as in disagree with PAP's overemphasis on english language in their policies, even though its against the rule of proportionality to the fact that 97% here are Asian and 75% are Chinese??

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

I have long since learnt my lesson not to engage you on such topics

lacking objectivity as in disagree with PAP's overemphasis on english language in their policies, even though its against the rule of proportionality to the fact that 97% here are Asian and 75% are Chinese??

 

[char_jig_kar]

I have long since learnt my lesson not to engage you on such topics

because its not me lacking of objectivity. its the country has been brainwashed by Lee Kuan Yew and PAP when comes to english language policies.

 

[lnchwmn_rules]

Not necessarily true on all occasions Red Devil. At times when the argument reaches an impasse or say circular logic, then what is the point of continuing with more arguments? Best to leave it to the forumers to draw their own conclusions on such occasions.

of course,when did uncle say you should continue and continue even when it reaches an impasse?

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

I rest my case

because its not me lacking of objectivity. .

 

[lnchwmn_rules]

please show me any circular logic in my arguments.

haizzz....xia suay xia suay ....let ppl say until like dat

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

So your earlier statement was confined to your dialogue with the TS?

of course,when did uncle say you should continue and continue even when it reaches an impasse?

 

[char_jig_kar]

haizzz....xia suay xia suay ....let ppl say until like dat

porfirio had said the circular argument he mentioned was not directed at me.

 

[lnchwmn_rules]

:p

porfirio had said the circular argument he mentioned was not directed at me.

when did i say the circular argument mentioned was directed at you?

 

[lnchwmn_rules]

So your earlier statement was confined to your dialogue with the TS?

errrhhh....pls read my earlier statement and tell me where does it say we should continue and continue even tho there is an impasse.

Rule No.1 : Never say i will let the forummers decide, it translates to "I surrender, someone pls help me"

 

[Frankiestine]

Very good point. It appears that born and bred pink i/c ethnic minorities are encountering the real effects of such a badly implemented policy on a daily basis while conducting their normal activities of living

But the scums greatly miscalculated on the local chinese receptiveness to these new arrivals...never did they expect them too to reject these pariah prcs.....

 

[SIFU]

But the scums greatly miscalculated on the local chinese receptiveness to these new arrivals...never did they expect them too to reject these pariah prcs.....

nobody with common sense will welcome prcs...

KNN, our government is the only 1 without common sense

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

So does this apply to a situation of impasse?

Rule No.1 : Never say i will let the forummers decide, it translates to "I surrender, someone pls help me"

 

[lnchwmn4]

of course not, how can there be an impasse when one party is saying "i surrender, someone pls help me."? .......like dat oso i must tell you issit?