• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Corruption in SCDF and CNB

ssrrvv11

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is still an unbelievable dumb thing for these two scholars to do. I am not convinced at all. Yes, they might have done all these but there must be something more than that.

Getting CPIB to investigate "serious personal misconduct"? CPIB becomes some pet private investigator for PAP? My toes are laughing.

Goh Meng Seng

gms,

u think no one laugh at u when u throw your weight (massive i must add) behind tan kin lian is it :biggrin:

that btw is also an unbelievably dumb thing to do.
 
Last edited:

hurley

Alfrescian
Loyal
what are some of the top American multinational firms in IT?
HP?
Dell?

anyone from SCDF or work there before? what PC brands were u all using?

The Straits Times reported that both men admitted they had improper relationships with a woman reportedly working for a top American multinational firm, but the CPIB has declined to comment or confirm this. Other senior SCDF officers and employees in private sector IT firms have also been helping in the investigations.
 

hurley

Alfrescian
Loyal
everybody love to see anyone related to the pappies to fall. GMS, the UFO man, even more so :biggrin:

gms,

u think no one laugh at u when u throw your weight (massive i must add) behind tan kin lian is it :biggrin:

that btw is also an unbelievably dumb thing to do.
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
I always believe, if a smart intelligent person wants to be corrupt, he will not be like a stupid thief only go for petty theft. Risk-return analysis will show that it is not worth while after all.

Thus if these two top scholars are really corrupt, there must something bigger than having "serious personal misconduct".

Goh Meng Seng
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It is still an unbelievable dumb thing for these two scholars to do. I am not convinced at all. Yes, they might have done all these but there must be something more than that.

Getting CPIB to investigate "serious personal misconduct"? CPIB becomes some pet private investigator for PAP? My toes are laughing.

My toes are dumbstruck by your comment. First and foremost, CPIB works for the government of the country, not PAP as a party. PAP just happens to be the party in government. If you can, win elections and take over government and CPIB is under your command. You can even disband it if you want. Then, what's wrong with investigating and taking action against misconduct and/or corruption? Public servant misconduct and/or corruption is offence against the state, not any party in particular. Any party or entity can lodge a report CPIB. Last but not least, the SCDF commissioner and CNA director are both not PAP members.

Whether they're dumb or not are their problems. Whether there're anything more to it are the investigating officers' problems. If you want to insinuate, even in the name of assisting investigation, you should also be able to substantiate. Let's begin by, let's tell us, what do you think is more to it?
 
Last edited:

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
what are some of the top American multinational firms in IT?
HP?
Dell?

anyone from SCDF or work there before? what PC brands were u all using?

Top American IT MNC providing services and IT solutions: my hunch tells me it is HP. Dell is no way considered 'top' these days.
 

wikiphile

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
I always believe, if a smart intelligent person wants to be corrupt, he will not be like a stupid thief only go for petty theft. Risk-return analysis will show that it is not worth while after all.

Thus if these two top scholars are really corrupt, there must something bigger than having "serious personal misconduct".

Goh Meng Seng

So King of Insects aka Raja Serangga aka Captain (NS) Obvious, if you know something that we do not know, please share it. If you don't know something we all know, please zip it.
 

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
I guess the standards of the SPF must be that damn low when someone like you who came from there to make such assertions!

Maybe you should try to go to CPIB and complain about some top civil servants having "personal misconduct" and ask them to investigate. Let's see whether they will be bothered at all or not!

It is NOT CPIB's job to investigate on "personal misconduct" or any extra-marital affairs. There are special agency which should be involved in such character checks of super scale civil servants. When you want to open a file in CPIB, you should have at least evidence of serious breach of public trust or corruptions. You don't go in there and complain about "personal misconduct" of senior civil servants.

Any wives who want to carry out extra-marital affairs should engage private investigators, not CPIB.

Goh Meng Seng



My toes are dumbstruck by your comment. First and foremost, CPIB works for the government of the country, not PAP as a party. PAP just happens to be the party in government. If you can, win elections and take over government and CPIB is under your command. You can even disband it if you want. Then, what's wrong with investigating and taking action against misconduct and/or corruption? Public servant misconduct and/or corruption is offence against the state, not any party in particular. Any party or entity can lodge a report CPIB. Last but not least, the SCDF commissioner and CNA director are both not PAP members.

Whether they're dumb or not are their problems. Whether there're anything more to it are the investigating officers' problems. If you want to insinuate, even in the name of assisting investigation, you should also be able to substantiate. Let's begin by, let's tell us, what do you think is more to it?
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I guess the standards of the SPF must be that damn low when someone like you who came from there to make such assertions!

Maybe you should try to go to CPIB and complain about some top civil servants having "personal misconduct" and ask them to investigate. Let's see whether they will be bothered at all or not!

It is NOT CPIB's job to investigate on "personal misconduct" or any extra-marital affairs. There are special agency which should be involved in such character checks of super scale civil servants. When you want to open a file in CPIB, you should have at least evidence of serious breach of public trust or corruptions. You don't go in there and complain about "personal misconduct" of senior civil servants.

Any wives who want to carry out extra-marital affairs should engage private investigators, not CPIB.

I don't go to CPIB to lodge a report just to prove a report can be lodged there by anyone. I'll lodge a report when I think it's necessary and there's ground for it. Corruption is not about cash alone, it can also be favor in kind unduly solicited or receieved in official capacity.
 

aurvandil

Alfrescian
Loyal
As I said earlier, I doubt it involves our own GLC's as they would not touch them with a 10 foot pole for CPIB can also go after them.

http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120126-323957.html

Bro Scrobal and TRE have suggested otherwise. The SCDF case involves purchase of a product from a San Diego IT company listed on Nasdaq. A Singapore GLC is said to have done the SI. The info in AsiaOne does not seem correct as the San Deigo IT company does not have any deals of size with CNB. The GLC however does. I suspect our msn is trying to hide the GLC involvement at this point in time. How they can do this when it goes to Court is beyond me ...
 
Last edited:

Goh Meng Seng

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
And the point is this, if these two super intelligent scholars are to be corrupt, would they just stop at having sexual favors as bribes?

MHA is just brushing these two aside by saying "personal misconduct". If that is so, why CPIB is involved in investigation?

Goh Meng Seng

I don't go to CPIB to lodge a report just to prove a report can be lodged there by anyone. I'll lodge a report when I think it's necessary and there's ground for it. Corruption is not about cash alone, it can also be favor in kind unduly solicited or receieved in official capacity.
 

ssrrvv11

Alfrescian
Loyal
And the point is this, if these two super intelligent scholars are to be corrupt, would they just stop at having sexual favors as bribes?

MHA is just brushing these two aside by saying "personal misconduct". If that is so, why CPIB is involved in investigation?

Goh Meng Seng

gms,

if u know anything pls share now.

you dont later after the facts are published everywhere then you come in and do your 马后炮 routine like you already knew it before everyone else.
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
And the point is this, if these two super intelligent scholars are to be corrupt, would they just stop at having sexual favors as bribes?

MHA is just brushing these two aside by saying "personal misconduct". If that is so, why CPIB is involved in investigation?

You've answered your own question, perhaps without realizing it. Sexual favor on official capacity is corrupt practice too and under the purview of CPIB. If there's further evidence that cash is also involved, they'll add it to the charge. You're just politicizing a corruption case when no politics is involved, just plain corrupt practice which can happen in any country under any government, even if Singapore is governed by WP or NSP. You're just crediting PAP with vote-winning impartiality by linking the accused persons to PAP, even when they're really apolitical, just corrupt.
 
Last edited:

cass888

Alfrescian
Loyal
You should get sued out of your pants, publicly using your name and all.

Doesn't matter, you can't win elections anyway. Even if you join a PAP ticket on a GRC you may be the cause of them losing the election. You're such a dumb fuck.

Thus if these two top scholars are really corrupt, there must something bigger than having "serious personal misconduct".

Goh Meng Seng
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
And the point is this, if these two super intelligent scholars are to be corrupt, would they just stop at having sexual favors as bribes?

MHA is just brushing these two aside by saying "personal misconduct". If that is so, why CPIB is involved in investigation?

Goh Meng Seng
dun agree with super intelligent la.....scholars means academic brillant only.....from the way they got trap by pussy i think sexual EQ total fail.
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
And the point is this, if these two super intelligent scholars are to be corrupt, would they just stop at having sexual favors as bribes?

MHA is just brushing these two aside by saying "personal misconduct". If that is so, why CPIB is involved in investigation?

Sexual favor in offcial capacity is corrupt practice under the purview of CPIB. If there's evidence of cash transacted, more charges will be preferred. Super intelligent scholars or super uneducated idiots are corrupt? Both are not surprising to me. Is it to you? Must super intelligent scholars always side with PAP? You should know best in NSP. There're some there who managed to displace you without being corrupt. Once scholarship is mentioned, it means PAP people has already become a fallacy. It has nothing to do with politics. By linking them to politics, you're just upplaying your legal ignorance and favorable image of PAP impartiality.
 
Last edited:
Top