• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Save the cyclist! Ban cycling on roads!!

Who says building extra lane? Why do you need all eight lanes on lim chu kang road for vehicles? Six lanes on mandai, four lanes on changi coast. Just need to carve out one lane for cycling will do.

You are just another thick skull sinkie who thinks that after paying road tax, you deserve every inch of road network.

crave out 1 lane?
already crave out 1 lane purely for buses
now you want another lane crave out for your shit alecoa bicycle.
tomm the ferrari will request another lane for their racing
 
Cycle lanes are not the problem - they are the solution.

[video=youtube;XuBdf9jYj7o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuBdf9jYj7o[/video]
 
I bet an obese peasant like you and all your kind cannot afford to take up cycling and hence you and all your kind have become so anti-cycling!

You sad deluded cyclist. Cycling is considered a cheap sport compared to paying the green fees and country club memberships.
 
Cycle lanes are not the problem - they are the solution.

[video=youtube;XuBdf9jYj7o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuBdf9jYj7o[/video]

as long as its not on the main road sharing with main traffic. already got park connectors, just ride your racers on park connectors will do.
 
Cycle lanes are not the problem - they are the solution.

[video=youtube;XuBdf9jYj7o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuBdf9jYj7o[/video]

One thing good about Amsterdam is you can even bring your bicycle inside the train ( I mean those big ah pek bike and not foldable ones ) there's a area inside the train to park your bike . It's really a bicycle country .
 
This is a good thread for debating . There's many rooms for debate .
 
The park connectors are not comprehensive. Forcing cyclists to cycle only there is relegating cycling to a past-time. I think it should be respected as a mode of transport, and should be given the space to do it. And Amsterdam is by no means the only country to provide for cyclists.

DSCF1353.jpg

And no, this is not PRC.

as long as its not on the main road sharing with main traffic. already got park connectors, just ride your racers on park connectors will do.
 
The park connectors are not comprehensive. Forcing cyclists to cycle only there is relegating cycling to a past-time. I think it should be respected as a mode of transport, and should be given the space to do it. And Amsterdam is by no means the only country to provide for cyclists.


And no, this is not PRC.

this pic taken in Taiwan. relegating to past time? isn't it just a past time since long time ago? look at those riders in flashy gears racing cars on the main road, are they not leisure riders or are they racing to earn a living? since the trend for local is riding bicycles on weekends, might as well ride on park connectors! road is congested and dangerous for them.
not many will really ride bicycle to work except ah tiong and bangla in sg, ecounter many ah tiong cycle to work. always ride in safe speed and handle the bike well, i got no prob sharing foot path with them.
if really local population want to cycle to work like what China used to be, i think there will be roads for them. the demand is not there. are u going to ride bicycle to work given local climate and weather?
be realistic, don't oppose because of ego or some idealism that is not realistic.
cycling is STILL a leisure activity in local context, park connectors is good enough for them and for their own safety.
i believe, if our populations wanted to cycle to work. they will be proper road for them.
 
Last edited:
There has been a lot of infrastructure changes across 1st world countries to enourage people in cities to take up cycling as a mode of transport, a sport and to reduce the dependence on fossil fueled vehicles.

You can see the increase in cycling on Singapore roads. Eventually the Govt has to act for safety reasons and to ride the wave.
 
There has been a lot of infrastructure changes across 1st world countries to enourage people in cities to take up cycling as a mode of transport, a sport and to reduce the dependence on fossil fueled vehicles.

You can see the increase in cycling on Singapore roads. Eventually the Govt has to act for safety reasons and to ride the wave.

agree, when there is really a trend or demand. they will be infrastructure for them in place.
 
Yes, there is a rise in leisure cyclists, and they have been taken care of (with park connectors, etc.) But it's those who cycle for transportation who need to be disciplined the most, not least because they are hazards to other road users.

Right now, neither TP or LTA can do anything about them because these agencies know that they have failed in providing adequate infrastructure for them. So, their solution appears to pretend they are not there. I've seen a cyclist riding against the flow of traffic along East Coast Rd in front of an LTA enforcer who purposely looked the other way. I asked the enforcer why he didn't do anything and he said he didn't see.

Once the infrastructure is in place, I would expect TP and LTA to enforce cycling rules with vigour.

And yes, I would consider riding to work when the infrastructure is in place. Summer in Taiwan and Amsterdam can be as hot if not hotter than in Singapore. And of course, it would be unsafe to ride when there is a typhoon or snow.

this pic taken in Taiwan. relegating to past time? isn't it just a past time since long time ago? look at those riders in flashy gears racing cars on the main road, are they not leisure riders or are they racing to earn a living? since the trend for local is riding bicycles on weekends, might as well ride on park connectors! road is congested and dangerous for them.
not many will really ride bicycle to work except ah tiong and bangla in sg, ecounter many ah tiong cycle to work. always ride in safe speed and handle the bike well, i got no prob sharing foot path with them.
if really local population want to cycle to work like what China used to be, i think there will be roads for them. the demand is not there. are u going to ride bicycle to work given local climate and weather?
be realistic, don't oppose because of ego or some idealism that is not realistic.
cycling is STILL a leisure activity in local context, park connectors is good enough for them and for their own safety.
i believe, if our populations wanted to cycle to work. they will be proper road for them.
 
Last edited:
pi_j.jpg



Plus another $23k for Pinarello Dogma with Campag Record gears and Lightweight wheels.

The bike in your picture is equipped with crap shimano dura ace components, not campagnolo record. You must be one of those atas fake cyclists who pretend to know a lot but actually know shit.:oIo:
 
There has been a lot of infrastructure changes across 1st world countries to enourage pople in cities to take up cycling as a mode of transport, a sport and to reduce the dependence on fossil fueled vehicles.

You can see the increase in cycling on Singapore roads. Eventually the Govt has to act for safety reasons and to ride the wave.

That cannot be feasible in a city of millionaires and trust fund kids. Only poor people cycle!

We must accept that in order to pack 7 million on this rock, certain personal liberties have to be sacrificed. The majority of the working class live in high density housing. If a tenth of residents took to cycling as a means of commuting to work, then we have a problem. How do we ease peak hour traffic for cyclists? How many more free parking bicycle stands must we build? All these money have to come from somewhere...

Fortunately we need not worry unduely. The local weather is simply too harsh for all but the most hardcore cyclist to even consider commuting to work in the CBD. Oh, and please do not try to board buses or mrt with your ah pek bicycles. There is barely enough standing space for people and you did not pay extra fares for your equipment!

Perhaps you are asking for a major rethink of the way our roads and pavements are being designed. Personally i would not sacrifice the big trees and little grass strips for a seperate bicycle track. If the GOS decides to cave in to public pressure, please widen the pedestrain pavement by half a metre or so to accomodate both cyclists and pedestrains. That is as far as i am willing to compromise for your personal liberties.
 
Good points bro.

Yes, there is a rise in leisure cyclists, and they have been taken care of (with park connectors, etc.) But it's those who cycle for transportation who need to be disciplined the most, not least because they are hazards to other road users.

Right now, neither TP or LTA can do anything about them because these agencies know that they have failed in providing adequate infrastructure for them. So, their solution appears to pretend they are not there. I've seen a cyclist riding against the flow of traffic along East Coast Rd in front of an LTA enforcer who purposely looked the other way. I asked the enforcer why he didn't do anything and he said he didn't see.

Once the infrastructure is in place, I would expect TP and LTA to enforce cycling rules with vigour.

And yes, I would consider riding to work when the infrastructure is in place. Summer in Taiwan and Amsterdam can be as hot if not hotter than in Singapore. And of course, it would be unsafe to ride when there is a typhoon or snow.
 
Good points bro.

Being a manipulative porlumpar kaypohchee again Scroobal?

He wrote a post with 4 paragraphs, I'm sure he knows they are good points otherwise he wouldn't bother.

So no need you to waste one post to ingratiate yourself and make yourself popular, manipulative kaypohchee Scroobal.
 
Couple of point to address.

1) Circa 1982, the political leaders caught the golf bug and 3 things came out of it. Firstly senior civil servants were encouraged and each Min and Stat had corporate memberships purchased for them. Secondly they managed to go on Golf Club building spree on this "tiny rock" and lastly as it reached fever pitch, the civil service changed its rules allow half day leave ostensibly for the benefit of everyone but the primary driver was that senior people could not be accommodated on weekends and you can cover 18 holes in half a day easily. All this in land scarce Singapore.

2) A lot of the cycles that you see on the road range from $1K to $25K.

3) What I saw in Golf I am now seeing in cycling. We are talking about senior and elites taking up cycling. MNC chiefs, Temasek bigwigs. etc. There is small shop diagonally opposite the Nasi Lemak stall and on a Saturday morning you can see the Elites and their bikes. And I am talking about a group who are in their 50s and 60s. And they all millionaires.

4) I have been to the US and some European cities and can see cycle specific infrastructure coming up. I was in London last Sept and saw the city full of cycles including the blue branded ones with so many docking stations. Even tourists now have taken to cycling around the city using credit cards to rent bikes from self service docks. Was there a few years before that and the change is surprising. As you knob, London traffic is heavy and streets are narrow. Surprised to find alot of cycle tracks alongside roads. Some how they managed to do it. They also have special super bikeways marked blue compared to the regular bike tracks marked green.

Looks like the Dutch are showing the World.



That cannot be feasible in a city of millionaires and trust fund kids. Only poor people cycle!

We must accept that in order to pack 7 million on this rock, certain personal liberties have to be sacrificed. The majority of the working class live in high density housing. If a tenth of residents took to cycling as a means of commuting to work, then we have a problem. How do we ease peak hour traffic for cyclists? How many more free parking bicycle stands must we build? All these money have to come from somewhere...

Fortunately we need not worry unduely. The local weather is simply too harsh for all but the most hardcore cyclist to even consider commuting to work in the CBD. Oh, and please do not try to board buses or mrt with your ah pek bicycles. There is barely enough standing space for people and you did not pay extra fares for your equipment!

Perhaps you are asking for a major rethink of the way our roads and pavements are being designed. Personally i would not sacrifice the big trees and little grass strips for a seperate bicycle track. If the GOS decides to cave in to public pressure, please widen the pedestrain pavement by half a metre or so to accomodate both cyclists and pedestrains. That is as far as i am willing to compromise for your personal liberties.
 
Couple of point to address.

1) Circa 1982, the political leaders caught the golf bug and 3 things came out of it.

2) A lot of the cycles that you see on the road range from $1K to $25K.

3) What I saw in Golf I am now seeing in cycling. We are talking about senior and elites taking up cycling. MNC chiefs, Temasek bigwigs. etc. There is small shop diagonally opposite the Nasi Lemak stall and on a Saturday morning you can see the Elites and their bikes. And I am talking about a group who are in their 50s and 60s. And they all millionaires.

4) I have been to the US and some European cities and can see cycle specific infrastructure coming up.

Couple of points means two points, you gullible blur fuck Scroobal.

And do you mind not boasting and showing off you arrogant bastard, it shows your pathetic upbringing. LOL.
 
Couple of points means two points, you gullible blur fuck Scroobal.

And do you mind not boasting and showing off you arrogant bastard, it shows your pathetic upbringing. LOL.

don't need to be so direct. i can point to several factual errors in shis post, but refrain from doing so due to exhaustion and the napoleon maxim. :D this fella knows no shame. heshe keeps harping, showing off, name dropping as though he's more knowledgeable about the universe than einstein or hawkings. if you notice a fool making a mistake, do not interrupt! :D
 
*********** deleted *********** double post
 
Last edited:
Back
Top