What rubbish are you spouting?
First, to friend or foe, CSJ has always been associated with human rights. He does not need to be seen as 'THE Singapore human rights politician'. He's in fact tempering the human rights slant and focussing on bread-and-butter issues so as to reach out to the heartland.
Second, CSJ compete with SL? For that matter, when did SL ever take credit for the 'anti-mandatory death penalty' or street protests? SL advocating civil disobedience? Which planet did you just come from?
Sheesh. The PAP IB must be really desperate. If you want to sow discord, please say something more intelligent and believable.
Thanks for confirming CSJ is obsessed with the stance that he was there first (human rights) and thanks for confirming CSJ is a lab-rat.
The ST deliberately said Hong Lim Park was designated as a place for protests due to a speech by LTK in parliament in 2006. I would imagine CSJ tearing his hair out.
When The Independent deliberately said Gilbert Goh is the father of protests, CSJ brought 30 cadres to appear at Hong Lim belatedly even though he knew the crowd was small. People laughed at the small crowd AND SDP.
When SL advocated allowing street protests, CSJ supported Roy to stage a protest march at Hong Lim. Many Singaporeans slammed the protest and SDP. SDP almost became un-electable. WP was politically-savvy enough to siam even though many members were there.
When PAP implemented anti-mandatory death penalty, the first thing WP did was to invite the turncoat Kirsten Han to a seminar for the same matter. NSP invited the opportunist Rachel Zeng to a similar seminar. LTK was talking animatedly in parliament, welcoming the anti-mandatory death penalty. In an interview, SL said she believes in anti-mandatory death penalty, unlike others who believe in anti-death penalty.
SL protested an "unjust" law on trade fairs is still fresh in our minds.
Too bad, Aung Saan Suu Chi took a photograph with LTK but refused to meet with CSJ. Even the Myanmar Times think CSJ is a flawed politician.