Sharon Ann Gabriel:
May
19, 2014 at 7:03 pm Sharon Ann
Gabriel(Quote)
Singaporeans will know how to put two and two together. A sledgehammer has
been used to kill criticism. By doing so, the winner has won a battle only to
lose the war. The PAP is bringing back its reign of terror. The use of the
social media by bloggers and netizens is coming under threat. The PAP message is
clear to all its critics: Better watch your butt.
李家有个龙呆子:
May
19, 2014 at 7:07 pm 李家有个龙呆子(Quote)
He’s supposed to resign for allowing sg to “belong to all living here”, but
now he’s suing an ordinary citizen instead?!
WTF! Who was the smart alec who wants us to respect him? This kind of LEEder
deserves our respect meh? Better wake up! Wake up, sg!
Roy, let us know how we – your fellow ordinary citizens can help in any way,
we’ll do our part for you.
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating:
+18 (from 18 votes)
Con People Fund ( CPF ):
May
19, 2014 at 7:20 pm Con People
Fund ( CPF )(Quote)
Ah yo yo.
A PM want to sue a blogger fir comment comparison.
If such a great man i will just ignore many comments as freedom of speech as
graceful societies.
So i wonder if PAP call Sporean untrue facts can we sue the PAP MPs?
A big bully is what i can read as.
Vote To Change Con People Fund ( CPF)
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating:
+1 (from 1 vote)
geylangkid:
May
19, 2014 at 7:21 pm geylangkid(Quote)
The maid is taking the employer to court because the maid said the employer
asked her if she saw his money on the table.
The maid said by asking her this question, he is accusing her of stealing and
being a thief and destroyed her integrity as a maid.
The employer who pays her salary has no right in his own home.
This maybe the Servant Leadership explained in a certain stupid political
video!
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating:
0 (from 0 votes)
Dollars & Sense:
May
19, 2014 at 7:32 pm Dollars
& Sense(Quote)
Simple argument why the PM is WRONG to take this action:
A recipient of a service or product should be able to complain, speculate or
criticise if the service or product she or he receives is perceived as
malfunctioning or inadequate, and with no explanation or details being provided
by the service provider. If a customer is being sued everytime she or he makes
noise about the level of service or product he receives which does not meet
satisfaction, and is not given explanation, then businesses can be substandard
and will still thrive. In fact, businesses can cheat people in broad daylight
and silence people by suing (because they got power and money).
Here, we are not talking business, we are talking Prime Minister, a
Government for the people. It is very, very, very disturbing that the PM takes
this course of action instead of providing an explanation with the mainstream
media on the ready to publish any story the PM can come up with.
If a travel agency makes customers contribute compulsorily and does not pay
back anything or force customers to use it in ultra expensive travels, and Mr
Ngerng writes a similar article about it, the PM is saying the travel agency
should just sue Mr Ngerng, no need even to offer any explanation to convince
customers. The Govt forcing people to contribut their money is no difference, it
owes an explanation to the people.
Most crucially, If the complain, speculation or criticism is not shared by
many others, then the service provider or in this case, the PM has no cause for
concern at all and does not need to take this drastic course of action. There is
nothing to fear or worry even if the article goes viral if 99% of other
‘customers’ do not share the same experience or feel the same way.
Can’t believe 60% do not stop for one moment to think what is right and what
works for the good of the country, they just blindly side with the PM (maybe
simply because he is the PM, he is a Lee, he is a graduate from…., he is son
of…. and so whatever he does is right).
VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating:
0 (from 0 votes)