• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Dog or Lioness?

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
My choice is NEVER to sacrifice myself to be a slave dog. Never NEVER NEVER!

My Christian beliefs tell me not to exchange my soul for the whole world's riches. Rather keep my dignity and sanity than be living in luxury but a dog with no mind and independence.

Traitors such as you John Tan are a disgrace to the future generations of Singapore... willingly selling yourselves to attain riches at the expense of fellow sinkies.

Pro-Singapore ppl like Dr Chee and JBJ, willingly committed themselves 100% to fight for the betterment of sinkies. Only PAP dogs and thieves pretend to be pro-Singapore when they are actually helping themselves to the wealth of this land.


You are talking nonsense! Look at former minister Ho Peng Kee. After serving many years in the Cabinet, he is now happily retired and it is said that he is now focusing on church work. People like Chee and JBJ are just deluded with illusions of grandiose that they are sacrificing themselves for all sinkies. Most sinkies don't see it that way. They have voted against JBJ and Chee enough times.

Most sinkies also agree that PAP is working for the people. Most of them willingly vote for PAP.

You clearly have very misguided beliefs that are non-Christian. You are not some martyr for sinkies. You are just a shit-stirring troublemaker. Why not apply yourself to really helping your neighbourhood by signing up with the grassroots? You will make a bigger impact than Chee or JBJ ever will.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sorry John Tan, I dun work with grassloots who betray the ppl. These scums of the earth are working for themselves and their masters. Ppl do not see the PA, CC, RC, CCC, MC as independent. They are organs used by the PAP. Obedient dogs working for and beholden to the PAP. They only serve the PAP and not the ppl.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Sorry John Tan, I dun work with grassloots who betray the ppl. These scums of the earth are working for themselves and their masters. Ppl do not see the PA, CC, RC, CCC, MC as independent. They are organs used by the PAP. Obedient dogs working for and beholden to the PAP. They only serve the PAP and not the ppl.

You are clearly one of the minority. Most of the local residents treat their grassroots volunteers with a lot of respect. Many of them appreciate the amount of time and effort put in by the grassroots people in social work.

Even foreigners are keen to sign to be grassroots leaders to help out in their own local enclaves.

20130902_dormitories_st_0.jpg


NGO Migrant Workers' Centre chairman Yeo Guat Kwang distributes work permit card sleeves to workers at Soon Lee Lodge on 2 September 2013. About 1000 sleeves were given out by MWC. The sleeves will have the contact number of MWC which they can call. Mr Yeo announced at a press conference that foreign workers will be appointed grassroots leaders at all 40 purpose built dormitories by the end of the year.
- See more at: http://news.asiaone.com/news/singap...lp-detect-problems-early#sthash.nVr3m19N.dpuf
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
Me a minority? Many sinkies treat the grasslooters with disdain! Many of them view these scums of the earth as working for themselves and their masters.

The locals keep away from these despised grasslooters. RC could attract only foreigners who needed some sort of favors... ppl like Yang Yin. These are blood suckers who volunteered themselves for the community. We do well to keep an eye on these free loaders.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why be a dog... given the best food, superb grooming, big bungalows, etc but with no freedom? Chained every day to the master with no mind of your own? One false bark and you are punished.

Yes you get to eat fine food. Get pats once a while. But nevertheless living a prisoner life like a bird in a cage. Look at Nathan and you know what I mean. Cannot speak out of turn or all the privileges withdrawn. Pitiful fellow.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
God made humans with the ability to think. But these slave dogs prefer not to put on their thinking caps... surrendering themselves as submissive dogs! Getting riches is all they can think of!

Many of these human dogs continue to be charmed by S'pore's dog whisperer LHL.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
Many of these human dogs continue to be charmed by S'pore's dog whisperer LHL.

These dogs are well fed and well paid, living in bungalows. Life for them is good... equaled to having a Swiss Standard of Living. The odinary peasants struggling from hand to mouth isn't their concern. Die die your business they will tell the peasants!
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
These dogs are well fed and well paid, living in bungalows. Life for them is good... equaled to having a Swiss Standard of Living. The odinary peasants struggling from hand to mouth isn't their concern. Die die your business they will tell the peasants!

Must be the minority of you. Most sinkies own their homes. They have good electrical appliances, can afford eat well in the malls and coffeeshops. How else do you think PAP can win 10 consecutive GEs, and is set to win the coming GE too?
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
Must be the minority of you. Most sinkies own their homes. They have good electrical appliances, can afford eat well in the malls and coffeeshops. How else do you think PAP can win 10 consecutive GEs, and is set to win the coming GE too?

All you can say is this? The more you repeat this: "How else do you think PAP can win 10 consecutive GEs, and is set to win the coming GE too?" it shows what an imbecile and unthinking dog you have become!

Have been explained many times for which you have no answer. The dirty tricks the PAP used to win elections after elections are simply the delineation of boundaries before every election, forming of GRC, control of the media, creating fear, giving out goody goodies, upgrading issues, serial numbers on the ballot paper, etc. The unequal playing field is to this day in favor of the PAP!

Now your turn to rebut doggie John Tan.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
Doggie John Tan, since you are unwilling and unable to response, please refrain from posting the same rubbish "How else do you think PAP can win 10 consecutive GEs, and is set to win the coming GE too?"

If you do, I shall always give you the same standard reply, "the delineation of boundaries before every election, forming of GRC, control of the media, creating fear, giving out goody goodies, upgrading issues, serial numbers on the ballot paper, etc."

You dogs have no shame. No integrity. Come out of your cocoon and be independent thinkers! Dun be unthinking slaves to the PAP.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is no dog... Said Zahari
http://www.theantdaily.com/Main/This-is-Said-Zahari-Patriotic-powerful-and-principled

This is Said Zahari: Patriotic, powerful and principled

by Mariam Mokhtar 20 May 2015 10:00 AM

OUTSPOKEN: Today, few Malaysians and Singaporeans know that among them
stands a Malay, who is of great stature.

Said Zahari may have been born a Singaporean, but his actions in defending
the freedom of the press, promoting Malay intellectualism, upholding the
highest principles and showing courage in the course of his duties, have
largely been ignored by historians.

Today, Malays like Said Zahari are rare but when he was younger, there were
many Malays who were not afraid of making a stand, who were courageous in
the line of duty, who steadfastly defended their fellow human beings and who
were not afraid of the truth. Today, very few Malays measure up to the man
whom we call Said Zahari, or simply Pak Said.

So, who is Said Zahari? Let us measure him by what he tried to do, in the
50s and 60s, in Malaya and Singapore.

http://www.theantdaily.com/Documents/Article/28567/This-is-Said-Zahar_novel.jpg

Said Zahari's memoirs, called "Dark Clouds at Dawn," and the Malay version
called "Dalam Ribuan Mimpi Gelisah: Memoir Said Zahari, give an interesting
insight into the man. There are some uncomfortable truths, which will
certainly divide opinion. He was fearless, and possessed an uncompromising
attitude, when it mattered.

As the editor, of Utusan Melayu, Said Zahari led a strike in 1961, to
protest against a takeover of the paper, by the government of the day. The
government demanded that the paper, conform to its policy. Said refused to
back down, when confronted by an Umno man called Ibrahim Fitri, who was sent
to pressure Said Zahari.

By 1961, despite Said Zahari being aware that the board of directors at
Utusan Melayu, was under the control of a few Umno individuals, he was full
of hope. He thought that the role of an independent press was to provide the
rakyat with the confidence to speak openly about contentious issues, and
thus enable both political and economic reforms to take place.

Uppermost in Said Zahari's mind was the original aims of Utusan Melayu,
which were to champion the cause of the people and be an outlet for their
ideas. The paper, founded by Yusuf Ishak in 1939, was the first Malay-owned
newspaper, had three aims in its mission statement, "To serve the religion,
the people and the country." Yusuf Ishak later became the first President of
Singapore.

When Ibrahim Fikri put his four demands to Said Zahari, the latter and the
staff in Utusan Melayu retaliated. They were shocked by the arrogance of
Umno and later led the Malay-driven strike, which lasted for 100 days, to
protect the independence of Utusan Melayu. The strike was apparently broken
when Said Zahari was prevented from entering Malaya, after a visit to the
newspaper's offices in Singapore.

The paper, which we now call Utusan Malaysia, was initially called Utusan
Melayu. If Said Zahari had his way, today's Utusan would, not be the
mouthpiece of Umno Baru and spew government propaganda, including racist and
religious nonsense.

If Said Zahari had not been detained by Lee Kuan Yew, during Operation Cold
Store, for 17 years, but had been allowed to defend press freedom, both
Malaysia and Singapore might have been very different. Not in terms of
skyscrapers and development, but in the morality of governance.

If Said Zahari had not been punished for defending the right of the media,
to write without fear or favour, he would have ensured the independence of
the press and its role in curbing the excesses of governments.

If Said Zahari had not incurred the wrath of both Tunku Abdul Rahman and Lee
Kuan Yew, both Malaysia and Singapore would not be promoting hate and fear,
especially the racist and religious rhetoric of the current Malaysian
government.

http://www.theantdaily.com/Documents/Article/28567/This-is-Said-Zahar_TEXT.jpg

If Said Zahari had not been mercilessly cut-down in the prime of his life,
he would have made useful contributions to Malaysian and Singaporean
politics and helped to shape both nations. We may have had a more
transparent and accountable government. The governments would not have been
able to do as they please, because people like Said Zahari would have been
their greatest critic.

Sadly, very few Malaysians have heard of Said Zahari, the one-time editor of
Utusan Melayu, the first Malay-owned newspaper which fought for independence
from the British. Said Zahari celebrated his 87th birthday on May 18, his
greatest traits are his character, his integrity and the personal sacrifices
he made, throughout his life. These have been largely ignored.

Said Zahari is among the great Malays of his time, and in our time. Through
Utusan Melayu's editorials, the editors incurred the wrath of both foreign
and domestic governments. They were unapologetic, when writing the truth.

When confronted by an Umno man, who demanded the paper apologise for writing
a story which detailed the plight of some Malay farmers, Said Zahari said,
"I am a journalist, not a diplomat. I do not speak the language of
diplomacy."

(Footnote: The third volume of Said Zahari's political memoirs, will be
released soon.)
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
All you can say is this? The more you repeat this: "How else do you think PAP can win 10 consecutive GEs, and is set to win the coming GE too?" it shows what an imbecile and unthinking dog you have become!

Have been explained many times for which you have no answer. The dirty tricks the PAP used to win elections after elections are simply the delineation of boundaries before every election, forming of GRC, control of the media, creating fear, giving out goody goodies, upgrading issues, serial numbers on the ballot paper, etc. The unequal playing field is to this day in favor of the PAP!

Now your turn to rebut doggie John Tan.

PAP won elections simply by improving the lives of the majority. Period.

PAP continued to win elections by pleasing more voters than it pissed off with its various policies. Period.

There are no dirty tricks. GRCs won't keep them in power if enough voters are unhappy with PAP and vote them out. But the hard truth is that Ah Gong was a very astute man. He learnt and applied many basic truths in life to politics after surviving the Jap Occupation and the British colonial rule. As long as Ah Gong took care of the bread-and-butter issues, he would have secured the votes of the majority. Vast majority of voters are a lot more concerned about putting food on the table and improvement to their lives over democracy and freedom of speech.

While Chee and JBJ yap non-stop about these ideals and some people do appreciate, most also realized that Chee and JBJ and other opposition figures have no idea and little interest in bread-and-butter issues. So, these duds only secure the minority of the votes on a regular basis.

Every good government gives out goodies. Only a corrupt government will keep the goodies for itself. There are many resource rich countries that have very poor infrastructure because their government plundered the state resources for personal enrichment.

Ballot slips are serialized to prevent electoral fraud such as stuffing the ballot boxes. If you think your civil service boss or government public service is mistreating you because you voted for opposition, this is your golden opportunity to file a police report and get rid of them, because according to the law, your vote is secret. Even Low Thia Khiang conceded that your vote is secret.

Political playing fields have always been unequal since the beginning of time. Even Ah Gong was once the opposition. The opposition here face an uphill task because PAP focuses on bread-and-butter issues. Many sinkies do travel around the ASEAN region and beyond, and we have seen for ourselves the poverty that exists in many parts of the world because their government is way more concern about being corrupt than about improving the lives of the people.

That's why majority of voters vote for PAP.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
All doggies please answer the questions I have set out below:

1. announcements for election are made weeks(not months) before GE as in truly First World countries
2. GRC skewed the results in favor of PAP
3. the press is not free and independent
4. giving out goodies is an inducement to vote PAP
5. PAP used upgrading as an incentive to get them voting PAP
6. serial numbers on the ballot paper create the fear that votes may not be secret
7. the playing field is not level
8. PAP has control of the Election Dept, police, judiciary, civil service, parleement, media
9. ppl working for the PAP are dogs

If you answered all positively, you are thinking indeed. If not, you are dog gone... your doggie pedigree is truly confirmed!
 
Last edited:

Sir_Fcuk

Lunch Corporal
Loyal
A lioness has multiple lovers and mates whom she chooses. A lioness doesn't obey anyone but enjoys complete freedom.

Would you prefer to be a dog or a lioness?

Which storybook are you reading from?

A Lioness serves as a sex toy for Lions (hence multiple sex partners, but Alpha Lion chiong first) and then has to hunt to feed the cubs AND the Lions lol..... very independent!!
 
Top