Chiang completely trusted his new US Chief of Staff. there were no more supplies issues. the two eventually developed a great working relationship. soon after his arrival in China, Wedemeyer did an extensive check of all Chinese army equipments and reported that not a single US gun or bullet had gone to Chinese armies east of Yunnan ( don't know what that mean ) with the exception of 500 tons belatedly delivered to Kweilin and Liuchow ( given by Wedemeyer ). source was from Chennault.
Wedemeyer was honest/frank and always spoke his mind on the good and bad of Chiang/KMT. he never mentioned anything about Chiang hoarding lend-lease supplies before and after the war.
in 1937, half or less the entire Chinese armies obeyed Nanking orders. China to Japan aircrafts - 1:8? China had a weak or non existent navy. Japan had one of the largest and powerful navy in the world. Japan army equipments standard, i don't really know.
East of Yunnan should be the main front facing the japanese in china proper. Stiwell had been using supplies to equip the KMT corp trapped in India after the fall of burma and also to reequip the 15+ divisions of KMT troops that were transferred from central china aka changsha sector to support the Slim's 14th Army thrust into burma during the dry season of 1944.
there was accussation from the KMT general aka warload holding the line in changsha that lao chiang order him to withdraw in the face of IJA advance as lao chiang dont want to waste troops in a war that about to end. chiang even withhold supplies and reinforcements from him during the I-chigo operation to force him to withdraw.
While KMT on paper have 5m troops but chiang personally control maybe only 40-50%. His best troops were the german trained divisions which chiang withheld from action in the frontline number about 20 divisions. Many of the so-call KMT troops facing the japanese were troops belong to warlords who are allied with KMT. These troops technically dont belong to chiang so equipment not as lavish as chiang personal troops.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German-trained_divisions_in_the_National_Revolutionary_Army
i know KMT had very little heavy equipments and aircrafts compare to the japanese but it the same case as the CCCP "volunteers" in korea where they attack in human wave where only the first wave have firearms and the later wave can pick up from the fallen. Compare to the firepower of the US firepower, japanese so call better technologies suddenly look puny. Why the communist troops can push the US troops from Yalu to the current borders while the KMT lost 40% of China to japan?
while IJA had better aircrafts and heavy artillery than KMT, but chinese copies of the mauser were better rifle than the japanese arisaka. The more numerous 7.92mm Hanyang88 and the newer 8mm Chiang Kaishek rifles have longer range and better stopping power than the 6.5mm arisaka. jap light and heavy MGs are a joke. The KMT was using the Czech version of the bren LMG ZB vr.26. Bren was the best LMG in the world, much better than the US BAR. the british army use the bren till the 80s. HMG were the maxim 08 and the MG34, which were use by the wehmacht in WW2. semi automatic pistol we saw on tv that have red hankie tie to it was the C96 broomhandle, fire a 7.63mm round or if a chinese copy, 0.45ACP same as the tommy gun. Almost all were build in chinese factories, so the supplies should not be a big problem. by 1943, KMT/US airforces no longer allow IJA to bomb at will.
by the way, IJA lost more than a million KIA in the conflict which is almost par with KMT losses. So it not as one sided as one perviced.
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/张自忠
the above was the highest ranking Allied Powers' general to be kill in the war. Taiwan just made a TV drama serial on him.