• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

WP Low, Lim, Singh, AHTC & Their Suspiciously Strenuous Objections to the "Big Four" Accountants

…Continuing from Msgs 1, 12, 20, 31, 42, 58 & 60

Two months had passed since 27 November 2015 over the haggling over which accountants to appoint. The wasted time included the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress going so far as to apply to the CoA for “directions” on seven questions it had relating to “how” it should go about “choosing” its accountants. The CoA, rightfully, dismissed the triumvirate’s application on the grounds that this was a “matter of common sense”, and that it was “neither appropriate nor helpful to draw the court into a consideration of these [seven] questions", and the triumvirate should be focussed on appointing "the most suitable and qualified" accountants for the job. The issue of which accountant to appoint, it added, could be “swiftly resolved with common sense and commitment”.

Friday, 05 February 2016 arrived. This was the deadline which the CoA had set for the triumvirate to decide on which accountant (from the Big Four) it had to appoint. Instead of doing so, the triumvirate announced that they had written to the CoA to ask for “more time” to decide on which one of the Big Four they should choose.

Unless one is deaf, dumb and blind, or a WP gongkia and cultist, it is blatantly obvious that the triumvirate’s goal was to obstruct, delay and buy time. That they were prepared to be publicly chided and be seen as incredibly stupid or thoroughly incompetent by asking the CoA for “direction” on “how” to “choose” an accountant indicate that this unwelcomed impression of incredible stupidity and through incompetence was a far better option than that of opening up their books without delay.

Question: So again, the question: What exactly were the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress trying desperately to cover up and hide, and hoping desperately to continue remain hidden and uncovered? Do all their shenanigans have anything to do with corruption or Shameless Low’s business interests vis-à-vis AHTC/AHPETC?

Stay tuned to connect the dots.

To be continued...
 
…Continuing from Msgs 1, 12, 20, 31, 42, 58 & 60

Two months had passed since 27 November 2015 over the haggling over which accountants to appoint. The wasted time included the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress going so far as to apply to the CoA for “directions” on seven questions it had relating to “how” it should go about “choosing” its accountants. The CoA, rightfully, dismissed the triumvirate’s application on the grounds that this was a “matter of common sense”, and that it was “neither appropriate nor helpful to draw the court into a consideration of these [seven] questions", and the triumvirate should be focussed on appointing "the most suitable and qualified" accountants for the job. The issue of which accountant to appoint, it added, could be “swiftly resolved with common sense and commitment”.

Friday, 05 February 2016 arrived. This was the deadline which the CoA had set for the triumvirate to decide on which accountant (from the Big Four) it had to appoint. Instead of doing so, the triumvirate announced that they had written to the CoA to ask for “more time” to decide on which one of the Big Four they should choose.

Unless one is deaf, dumb and blind, or a WP gongkia and cultist, it is blatantly obvious that the triumvirate’s goal was to obstruct, delay and buy time. That they were prepared to be publicly chided and be seen as incredibly stupid or thoroughly incompetent by asking the CoA for “direction” on “how” to “choose” an accountant indicate that this unwelcomed impression of incredible stupidity and through incompetence was a far better option than that of opening up their books without delay.

Question: So again, the question: What exactly were the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress trying desperately to cover up and hide, and hoping desperately to continue remain hidden and uncovered? Do all their shenanigans have anything to do with corruption or Shameless Low’s business interests vis-à-vis AHTC/AHPETC?

Stay tuned to connect the dots.

To be continued...

Wow you now how to spew PAP shit.
 
…Continuing from Msgs 1, 12, 20, 31, 42, 58 & 60

Two months had passed since 27 November 2015 over the haggling over which accountants to appoint. The wasted time included the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress going so far as to apply to the CoA for “directions” on seven questions it had relating to “how” it should go about “choosing” its accountants. The CoA, rightfully, dismissed the triumvirate’s application on the grounds that this was a “matter of common sense”, and that it was “neither appropriate nor helpful to draw the court into a consideration of these [seven] questions", and the triumvirate should be focussed on appointing "the most suitable and qualified" accountants for the job. The issue of which accountant to appoint, it added, could be “swiftly resolved with common sense and commitment”.

Friday, 05 February 2016 arrived. This was the deadline which the CoA had set for the triumvirate to decide on which accountant (from the Big Four) it had to appoint. Instead of doing so, the triumvirate announced that they had written to the CoA to ask for “more time” to decide on which one of the Big Four they should choose.

Unless one is deaf, dumb and blind, or a WP gongkia and cultist, it is blatantly obvious that the triumvirate’s goal was to obstruct, delay and buy time. That they were prepared to be publicly chided and be seen as incredibly stupid or thoroughly incompetent by asking the CoA for “direction” on “how” to “choose” an accountant indicate that this unwelcomed impression of incredible stupidity and through incompetence was a far better option than that of opening up their books without delay.

Question: So again, the question: What exactly were the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress trying desperately to cover up and hide, and hoping desperately to continue remain hidden and uncovered? Do all their shenanigans have anything to do with corruption or Shameless Low’s business interests vis-à-vis AHTC/AHPETC?

Stay tuned to connect the dots.

To be continued...

The WP MPs were stupid ...they allow PAP to dictate the rules of the battle. The WP MPs could have opted for another international auditing firm instead of the big four which are populated by PAP cronies.
 
…Continuing from Msgs 1, 12, 20, 31, 42, 58 & 60

Two months had passed since 27 November 2015 over the haggling over which accountants to appoint. The wasted time included the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress going so far as to apply to the CoA for “directions” on seven questions it had relating to “how” it should go about “choosing” its accountants. The CoA, rightfully, dismissed the triumvirate’s application on the grounds that this was a “matter of common sense”, and that it was “neither appropriate nor helpful to draw the court into a consideration of these [seven] questions", and the triumvirate should be focussed on appointing "the most suitable and qualified" accountants for the job. The issue of which accountant to appoint, it added, could be “swiftly resolved with common sense and commitment”.

Friday, 05 February 2016 arrived. This was the deadline which the CoA had set for the triumvirate to decide on which accountant (from the Big Four) it had to appoint. Instead of doing so, the triumvirate announced that they had written to the CoA to ask for “more time” to decide on which one of the Big Four they should choose.

Unless one is deaf, dumb and blind, or a WP gongkia and cultist, it is blatantly obvious that the triumvirate’s goal was to obstruct, delay and buy time. That they were prepared to be publicly chided and be seen as incredibly stupid or thoroughly incompetent by asking the CoA for “direction” on “how” to “choose” an accountant indicate that this unwelcomed impression of incredible stupidity and through incompetence was a far better option than that of opening up their books without delay.

Question: So again, the question: What exactly were the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress trying desperately to cover up and hide, and hoping desperately to continue remain hidden and uncovered? Do all their shenanigans have anything to do with corruption or Shameless Low’s business interests vis-à-vis AHTC/AHPETC?

Stay tuned to connect the dots.

To be continued...

Isn't it obvious to you that the big four are populated by PAP cronies?
 
…Continuing from Msgs 1, 12, 20, 31, 42, 58, 60 & 61

Almost four weeks after the deadline of 05 February 2016 set by the Court of Appeal (CoA) for the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress to decide on which accountant (from the Big Four) it had to appoint, the triumvirate finally decided, on 01 March 2016, on KPMG.

One whole year had elapsed since the AGO-PwC special audit report on 06 February 2015, and MND’s application to the High Court in March 2015 for an independent accountant to prevent taxpayers-funded grants in the millions that was disbursed to AHPETC/AHTC (AHTC) from being misused or abused.

In announcing the triumvirate’s choice of KPMG, Turbanless Tigress declared on 01 March 2016 that:
"KPMG is the most suitable firm and is capable of performing an independent and objective review."

The other three global professional service networks of Ernst and Young, Deloitte & Touch and PwC, with their total of about 797,130 employees around the globe and their combined annual revenues of about S$163 billion were, in the eyes of the triumvirate, not as capable of “performing an independent and objective review”.

The selection of KPMG by the triumvirate was strange if not suspicious. This was because HDB had already disclosed to the triumvirate about potential conflicts of interest that could arise from them appointing KPMG since its managing partner, Tham Sai Choy, sits on the HDB board. Whilst Tham had recused himself from “deliberations and decision-making” related to AHTC, the triumvirate’s final selection of KPMG was clearly political. Their self-serving selection was for the purpose of planting the idea amongst their starry-eyed gongkias, cultists and segments of the gullible public that KPMG’s inevitable findings and reports about the suspiciously high turnover of staff in the triumvirate’s AHTC Finance Department, the numerous and suspicious shambles in AHTC, including possible criminal conduct, were all politicised.

Without them having to contradict their own public declaration that “KPMG is the most suitable firm and is capable of performing an independent and objective review", they could continue to play victims and have their starry-eyed gongkias, cultists and segments of the gullible public believing and crying out that KPMG’s findings and reports, like the AGO's and other accountant reports on AHTC, were all "politicised", “unfair” and “prejudiced”.

Question: Isn't this why you three decided on KPMG? And the still unanswered question: What exactly were the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress trying desperately to cover up and hide, and hoping desperately to continue remain hidden and uncovered?

To be continued...

When in doubt, follow the money trail. Stay tuned to connect the dots.
 
Last edited:
The main question to ask is....are the residents in AHTC any worse off than those in other PAP TCs?

All PAP TCs are all 100% legit ... including the one in AMK ?
 
The main question to ask is....are the residents in AHTC any worse off than those in other PAP TCs?

Yes, they are worse off. They have been defrauded and duped by the fraudulent practices including the triumvirate's use of suspiciously irregular shortcuts that involved millions of dollars ($60 million) and a whole lot more extremely suspicious conduct and practices including the use of "dummy" vendor codes (and not the name of the businesses/suppliers as required if there is nothing to hide) for "payments" to these "vendors".

Is Low Thia Khiang's personal business hidden under one of these "dummy" codes to conceal his business dealings with AHTC? Stay tuned to find out.

All PAP TCs are all 100% legit ... including the one in AMK ?

No they are not. And that's why such lapses have been uncovered and pointed out by the AGO. Where necessary, there will be criminal charges.
 
Wow you now how to spew PAP shit.

It would be remiss of me to not do my duty for the sake of those gullible, simple-minded HDB folks who got duped, deceived and defrauded by the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress.

Shameless Low and Goh Meng Seng know who I am. If what I say is untrue, Shameless Low and his gang are free to sue me for libel.

More to come. I will try to peg what I say at Kindergarten level so that even gongkias like you will be able to connect the dots.
 
The WP MPs were stupid ...they allow PAP to dictate the rules of the battle. The WP MPs could have opted for another international auditing firm instead of the big four which are populated by PAP cronies.

A comment made by one of the more level-headed forummers, AhMeng in the "Police report made against 5 SCDF NSFs over leaked photos of Bionix accident" thread.

1542940330700.png


This is commonsensical. And commonsense should not be ditched just because it involves the triumvirate or this "opposition" party. If you have done nothing wrong, there is no need to hide. Conversely, if you have to hide, then it simply means you have done something wrong.

The more ferocious the triumvirate's fight to keep things hidden, the more it means that the shit they are trying to hide is enormous and stinks to high heavens.

There is prima facie evidence that a crime/crimes has/have been committed.
 
So what is the verdict? Is the WP ppl guilty and will go to jail?

The PAP could find any dirt on them all this while despite spending millions in audit fees (paid for by the residents eventually). So, it takes the civil route.

WP will lose because it seems the judge kowtows to bayi.

I hope this will be a Pyrrhic victory for the PAP.
 
A comment made by one of the more level-headed forummers, AhMeng in the "Police report made against 5 SCDF NSFs over leaked photos of Bionix accident" thread.

View attachment 49380

This is commonsensical. And commonsense should not be ditched just because it involves the triumvirate or this "opposition" party. If you have done nothing wrong, there is no need to hide. Conversely, if you have to hide, then it simply means you have done something wrong.

The more ferocious the triumvirate's fight to keep things hidden, the more it means that the shit they are trying to hide is enormous and stinks to high heavens.

There is prima facie evidence that a crime/crimes has/have been committed.

If the PAP had the evidence, they would have buried the WP trio long ago. Instead, the PAP took the civil suit route where bayi can dream and construct his version of the 'crime' committed. Except that there is NO crime.
 
It would be remiss of me to not do my duty for the sake of those gullible, simple-minded HDB folks who got duped, deceived and defrauded by the triumvirate of Shameless Low, Lying Lim and Turbanless Tigress.

Shameless Low and Goh Meng Seng know who I am. If what I say is untrue, Shameless Low and his gang are free to sue me for libel.

More to come. I will try to peg what I say at Kindergarten level so that even gongkias like you will be able to connect the dots.

You have failed the gullibles then. The PAP have conned them for decades. Why are residents paying more conservancy fees? Thanks to the PAP dismantling the HDB role in estate management. There was economies of scale but the PAP threw that away for what? So that PAP cronies can make money. The estate management company used by the PAP wards is 70 percent owned by HDB. So, the 30 percent owned by PAP cronies are just making lots of dough using the expertise of the HDB.

Remember the $2 company that bought the estate management software ...another PAP company with NO expertise. The PAP town councils sold the software which was developed with lots of dough for a song. And then the $2 company charge the PAP town councils a good sum plus 'CONSULTANCY FEES'. That fees is extra ...would not have to pay if town councils didn't sell the software to the PAP.

See you have failed in your duties to the people ...you choose to close an eye when the PAP raped the people. But you are quick to cook up your tales of wrongdoing by WP trio.
 
Yes, they are worse off. They have been defrauded and duped by the fraudulent practices including the triumvirate's use of suspiciously irregular shortcuts that involved millions of dollars ($60 million) and a whole lot more extremely suspicious conduct and practices including the use of "dummy" vendor codes (and not the name of the businesses/suppliers as required if there is nothing to hide) for "payments" to these "vendors".

Is Low Thia Khiang's personal business hidden under one of these "dummy" codes to conceal his business dealings with AHTC? Stay tuned to find out.



No they are not. And that's why such lapses have been uncovered and pointed out by the AGO. Where necessary, there will be criminal charges.

Wah, you better than the PAP auditors. They spent so many months going through the books and didn't find this. Why?
 
Back
Top