- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,580
- Points
- 0
speaking of ufc anything to say about alistair overeem after he was found guilty of doping and cannot fight against junior santos.
its true that stamina plays a important role in fighting ..most competition fights last longer than 10 seconds. without having sufficient levels of endurance, you'll turn into a limp-wristed Nancy-boy by the 11-second mark.... after all, your most powerful energy system usually wear out within 10 seconds.
if you havent developed the second energy system that comes into play, you're in a heap of trouble. We have all seen those monstrous muscle-heads walk into UFC or pride fights that end up gasping for air shortly after the first round begins. those dudes rarely end up with their arm raised at the end of the bout because their eyes are still in the back of their head while the winner is announced![]()
still remembers the first time i was choked, i thought i was going to die! panic till dunno how to tap, till the one choking me (yes he is the one choking) TAP WHEN U GIVE UP! TAP ! TAP! then i remember how to tap LOL
Movie extras. Compare Sammo Hung's role and Jackie in Enter the Dragon movie.
Sammo Hung was Bruce Lee's opponent in the first fight scene.
Jackie was the villain's henchman for only a few seconds.
What we show remember Bruce Lee by are the one-to-one fight scenes. The one-to-ten fight scenes are there to work up the appetites of cinema goers for the climatic scene of duel between last 2 fighters standing which is all that matters. It's part and parcel of any movie-making techniques. Jackie Chan's had plenty of that too and in fact one-to-fifty or hundred such fight scenes. But what's missing are the one-to-one memorial fight scenes. The reason is simple, Jackie is no martial art exponent and so is not up to it, he's just an acrobatic feigning some martial art moves.
Bro between the one who changed the world in many ways is Bruce Lee. Thus in terms of making a difference it has to be Bruce Lee by a long while. Here are the things that Bruce Lee led or influenced.
1) Brought Chinese cinema to the fore
2) A Chinese can be formidable opponent off the screen
3) Led to a massive boom in chinese martial arts across the western word from NZ to Canada. Every kid black, white and blue wanted to learn martial arts and their mums were keen.
4) His form of Martial arts jumped a couple of rungs to the top. In unarmed combat, it was the most feared
5) He was never recognised as an entertainer which is funny when it all began with movies but as phenomenal tour de force as an individual and a person who made a difference
6) Chinese were no longer seen as wimps to many in the physical space.
I have no doubt that Jackie Chan is a phenomenal actor, highly entertaining, wonderfully choreographed and executed stunts, attracts a wider audience than Bruce Lee will ever hope.
But bear this in mind, nobody from a 5 year old kid to a 70 year old man or woman will sport a t-shirt with Jackie Chan face on it. No momentos or collectors items will be made of him, nobody will claim him as their role model, their star. We all love ice cream but only a few will know what a Cabernet Savignon is. One is class and one is common.
Frankly there is no comparison between the two where the wider world is concerned. Forget about te 1 inch punch which is bullshit and scientifically improbable, forget about fighting ten men. It about which man changed the world.
i cant help but notice that kung fu practitioners get no respect from mma guys. they're always criticizing kung fu guys for doing forms and having no groundwork and oftentimes, they tend to kick kung fu practitioner ass. my question is, why is this so? with centuries history and hundreds of sifus adding to their arts, wouldn't the hundreds of kung fu styles be able to adapt to the fighting styles of mma guys? or are kung fu guys too limited by mma rules: no groin, eyes, hair?
i cant help but notice that kung fu practitioners get no respect from mma guys. they're always criticizing kung fu guys for doing forms and having no groundwork and oftentimes, they tend to kick kung fu practitioner ass. my question is, why is this so? with centuries history and hundreds of sifus adding to their arts, wouldn't the hundreds of kung fu styles be able to adapt to the fighting styles of mma guys? or are kung fu guys too limited by mma rules: no groin, eyes, hair?
This applies to most martial arts.
what applies to most martial arts ?
i cant help but notice that kung fu practitioners get no respect from mma guys. they're always criticizing kung fu guys for doing forms and having no groundwork and oftentimes, they tend to kick kung fu practitioner ass. my question is, why is this so? with centuries history and hundreds of sifus adding to their arts, wouldn't the hundreds of kung fu styles be able to adapt to the fighting styles of mma guys? or are kung fu guys too limited by mma rules: no groin, eyes, hair?
u have to thanks this to the gracie, honestly improvement in martial arts in the last 20 years all thanks to pride and UFC is far greater than the last 5000 years combined if u were to ask me.
Streetfighting has no rules, only win or lose. The fighters should be prepared to guard their own hair, eyes, groins etc.
Reminds me of the classic closing scene in the movie Unforgiven...
Gene Hackman : You've just shot an unarmed man.
Clint Eastwood : Well, he should have armed himself.
the form and all of that. The only martial art that seems to be effective and widely adopted in mma is muay thai and even then fighters don't train exclusively in 1 martial art. Those trained in muay thai for eg will be trained in bjj for eg.
[video=youtube;ABqD8Odaebw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABqD8Odaebw[/video]