- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 13,369
- Points
- 83
Wait till you take the peak hour train in Tokyo!!
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoTPs_NgW2w?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoTPs_NgW2w?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>


<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoTPs_NgW2w?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XoTPs_NgW2w?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>






Then you can further show that the PAp is doing a bad job, by taking the world' top 3 density of population cities and work out their average length of rail per SQkm to clearly compare the train coverage. FORMULA: The total length of rail in city divided by the total area of city. That is sure enough to show famiLEE LEEgime doing a poor job to give coverage of train service in red dot. The area & rail length data can be obtained from maps.google.com