• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The HDB 99-lease time bomb

SG women and foreigners have the best of both worlds: equal rights, but not equal responsibilities.
Women always prioritised security over responsibilities. That's they're also largely contributed to the PAP in power. And able to have a tardy feminist org like AWARE to exist.
 
Women always prioritised security over responsibilities. That's they're also largely contributed to the PAP in power. And able to have a tardy feminist org like AWARE to exist.
The Aware sexuality education training manual stated that: “Homosexuality is perfectly normal. Just like heterosexuality, it is simply the way you are. Homosexuals also form meaningful relationships, and face the same emotional issues that heterosexuals do.” It was this statement that raised the ire of the new leaders of Aware – president Josie Lau, honorary treasurer Maureen Ong, honorary secretary Jenica Chua and committee member Lois Ng. At their press conference in April 2009, Ms Ong, a mother of 3, said it was the sexuality education programme that made her worry about what Aware was teaching children. “I’m concerned. I’m a parent. It’s shocking,” she said. It spurred her to join Aware, and be part of its takeover in March 2009. Kudos to her and the others who took positive action.
 
Sinkie will become like hk housing need to stay at one room roof top.
 

Forum: Singapore’s public housing market needs a reality check​


UPDATED May 07, 2025, 05:00 AM


Four years ago, I wrote about public housing affordability as a first-time buyer (A battle between prudence and emotion in buying HDB home, Dec 28, 2021).

Now, at the precipice of my flat’s Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), I am bewildered. A property portal estimates I could make $200,000 in capital gains. Even older flats have appreciated beyond inflation, despite imminent lease decay. A deluge of fliers from property agents urging home owners to upgrade may explain why.

The Government’s efforts to boost housing supply and temper prices are commendable. But beyond supply and demand, exuberant price expectations fuelled by property agents are distorting the market.

In the 1980s, my in-laws purchased a flat in Tampines for $100,000. Over time, they upgraded to private property, with most of their home ownership journey funded by capital appreciation. Today, they live mortgage-free in a condominium in East Coast _ a testament to the outsize capital gains once possible in the housing market.

But Singapore has already transited to a First World nation, and we are unlikely to see an encore performance of the economic conditions that allowed for such windfalls. Yet, property agents continue to pander to our intrinsic desire to profit from public housing.

This is partly systemic. Property agents benefit from higher prices and more transactions. Their incentives are misaligned with sustainable home ownership, yet guard rails remain weak.

Agents now go door-to-door in Build-To-Order (BTO) estates reaching MOP, pitching dreams of windfall profit. They feed the belief that housing prices can only go up, dismissive of ageing demographics, falling birth rates and economic uncertainty. They argue that limited land supply and the Government’s cooling measures guarantee resilience. They peddle a narrative that property is a haven, a wealth generator and a status symbol.


This culture worries me. I have seen peers overextend themselves chasing property dreams. One pooled family savings just to show proof of funds for a larger loan. His mortgage now consumes 60 per cent of household income. Irrational exuberance has trumped financial prudence.

We should stop sensationalising million-dollar HDB transactions and crack down on irresponsible advertising by agents who promise cash-over-valuation deals or encourage buyers to over-leverage. Such measures, alongside the new HDB Resale Flat Listing service, can promote greater transparency, lower middleman costs, and empower Singaporeans to make financially sound housing decisions.

While we cannot undo the commodification of public housing, we can curtail those who stoke unsustainable expectations. We should not wait for the next boom-bust cycle for housing prices to normalise. A soft landing requires decisive action now – before optimism turns into a crisis.

Elgenia Wong Tien Min

Forum: Singapore’s public housing market needs a reality check​

UPDATED May 07, 2025, 05:00 AM

Four years ago, I wrote about public housing affordability as a first-time buyer (A battle between prudence and emotion in buying HDB home, Dec 28, 2021).
Now, at the precipice of my flat’s Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), I am bewildered. A property portal estimates I could make $200,000 in capital gains. Even older flats have appreciated beyond inflation, despite imminent lease decay. A deluge of fliers from property agents urging home owners to upgrade may explain why.
The Government’s efforts to boost housing supply and temper prices are commendable. But beyond supply and demand, exuberant price expectations fuelled by property agents are distorting the market.
In the 1980s, my in-laws purchased a flat in Tampines for $100,000. Over time, they upgraded to private property, with most of their home ownership journey funded by capital appreciation. Today, they live mortgage-free in a condominium in East Coast _ a testament to the outsize capital gains once possible in the housing market.
But Singapore has already transited to a First World nation, and we are unlikely to see an encore performance of the economic conditions that allowed for such windfalls. Yet, property agents continue to pander to our intrinsic desire to profit from public housing.
This is partly systemic. Property agents benefit from higher prices and more transactions. Their incentives are misaligned with sustainable home ownership, yet guard rails remain weak.
Agents now go door-to-door in Build-To-Order (BTO) estates reaching MOP, pitching dreams of windfall profit. They feed the belief that housing prices can only go up, dismissive of ageing demographics, falling birth rates and economic uncertainty. They argue that limited land supply and the Government’s cooling measures guarantee resilience. They peddle a narrative that property is a haven, a wealth generator and a status symbol.
This culture worries me. I have seen peers overextend themselves chasing property dreams. One pooled family savings just to show proof of funds for a larger loan. His mortgage now consumes 60 per cent of household income. Irrational exuberance has trumped financial prudence.
We should stop sensationalising million-dollar HDB transactions and crack down on irresponsible advertising by agents who promise cash-over-valuation deals or encourage buyers to over-leverage. Such measures, alongside the new HDB Resale Flat Listing service, can promote greater transparency, lower middleman costs, and empower Singaporeans to make financially sound housing decisions.
While we cannot undo the commodification of public housing, we can curtail those who stoke unsustainable expectations. We should not wait for the next boom-bust cycle for housing prices to normalise. A soft landing requires decisive action now – before optimism turns into a crisis.
Elgenia Wong Tien Min
 
The Aware sexuality education training manual stated that: “Homosexuality is perfectly normal. Just like heterosexuality, it is simply the way you are. Homosexuals also form meaningful relationships, and face the same emotional issues that heterosexuals do.” It was this statement that raised the ire of the new leaders of Aware – president Josie Lau, honorary treasurer Maureen Ong, honorary secretary Jenica Chua and committee member Lois Ng. At their press conference in April 2009, Ms Ong, a mother of 3, said it was the sexuality education programme that made her worry about what Aware was teaching children. “I’m concerned. I’m a parent. It’s shocking,” she said. It spurred her to join Aware, and be part of its takeover in March 2009. Kudos to her and the others who took positive action.
Homosexuals is a growth and existential threat
 
Now you hear 2-room BTO reselling at $400K and 3-room HDB across the board reaching $600K or above. The higher the happier for PAPPY voters, especially boomers.
 
Homosexuals is a growth and existential threat
The growing gay-rights movement in S'pore seeks to normalise the homosexual lifestyle here. First, they refer to their annual event as Pink Dot, which is a play on the nickname of our country - the Little Red Dot; it appears that their intention mirrors that of the militant gay movement in the U.S., which seeks to raise a generation of homosexuals. Second, they infiltrate the Comprehensive Sex Education programme in our schools by making insidious calls to our children to regard homosexual practices as normal. Third, they lobby for the right to publicise the gay lifestyle and impose it on others in the name of diversity and tolerance in our society.
 
Back
Top