• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Elgenia Wong Tien Min is very upset with property agents

disconsolate

Stupidman
Loyal
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
18,449
Points
113

Forum: Singapore’s public housing market needs a reality check​

Four years ago, I wrote about public housing affordability as a first-time buyer (A battle between prudence and emotion in buying HDB home, Dec 28, 2021).

Now, at the precipice of my flat’s Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), I am bewildered. A property portal estimates I could make $200,000 in capital gains. Even older flats have appreciated beyond inflation, despite imminent lease decay. A deluge of fliers from property agents urging home owners to upgrade may explain why.

The Government’s efforts to boost housing supply and temper prices are commendable. But beyond supply and demand, exuberant price expectations fuelled by property agents are distorting the market.

In the 1980s, my in-laws purchased a flat in Tampines for $100,000. Over time, they upgraded to private property, with most of their home ownership journey funded by capital appreciation. Today, they live mortgage-free in a condominium in East Coast _ a testament to the outsize capital gains once possible in the housing market.

But Singapore has already transited to a First World nation, and we are unlikely to see an encore performance of the economic conditions that allowed for such windfalls. Yet, property agents continue to pander to our intrinsic desire to profit from public housing.

This is partly systemic. Property agents benefit from higher prices and more transactions. Their incentives are misaligned with sustainable home ownership, yet guard rails remain weak.

Agents now go door-to-door in Build-To-Order (BTO) estates reaching MOP, pitching dreams of windfall profit. They feed the belief that housing prices can only go up, dismissive of ageing demographics, falling birth rates and economic uncertainty. They argue that limited land supply and the Government’s cooling measures guarantee resilience. They peddle a narrative that property is a haven, a wealth generator and a status symbol.


This culture worries me. I have seen peers overextend themselves chasing property dreams. One pooled family savings just to show proof of funds for a larger loan. His mortgage now consumes 60 per cent of household income. Irrational exuberance has trumped financial prudence.

We should stop sensationalising million-dollar HDB transactions and crack down on irresponsible advertising by agents who promise cash-over-valuation deals or encourage buyers to over-leverage. Such measures, alongside the new HDB Resale Flat Listing service, can promote greater transparency, lower middleman costs, and empower Singaporeans to make financially sound housing decisions.

While we cannot undo the commodification of public housing, we can curtail those who stoke unsustainable expectations. We should not wait for the next boom-bust cycle for housing prices to normalise. A soft landing requires decisive action now – before optimism turns into a crisis.

Elgenia Wong Tien Min
 
Most property agents lie to you. Assume you are a seller asking price $1mio for your unit..........

Your agent managed to secure a buyer for $980k, he will come back to you and tell you there is an offer for $950K. Then he will lie to you that the co-broke asks for higher commission to convince buyer to pay more than $950k.

Eg. Anything about 950k will not be 1% commission but maybe 50% commission. 50% commission for the fake "additional" $30K

Then you agree and close at 980K.

Most sellers experienced this. hahahaa
 
Most property agents lie to you. Assume you are a seller asking price $1mio for your unit..........

Your agent managed to secure a buyer for $980k, he will come back to you and tell you there is an offer for $950K. Then he will lie to you that the co-broke asks for higher commission to convince buyer to pay more than $950k.

Eg. Anything about 950k will not be 1% commission but maybe 50% commission. 50% commission for the fake "additional" $30K

Then you agree and close at 980K.

Most sellers experienced this. hahahaa
CEA needs to regulate such commission structure, or else we should shut down CEA.
 
Why can't those ter nao sinkies do their due diligence and calculate themselves?
Is it not difficult at all by gathering all the leequired figures.

1. Estimated selling price by checking the past 3 mths sales price of their neighbours thru hdb portal.

2. Their next flat purchase price also by checking the hdb portal.

3. The hdb or bank loan for next purchase.

4. Your CPF oa bear learn.

5. The agent fees

6. The reno fee.

I did my own estimation before selling and buying and managed to hit a tolerance of +- < > 2k with the final outcome.
Even my profits gained has a accuracy tolerance of +- 2k
 
Why can't those ter nao sinkies do their due diligence and calculate themselves?
Is it not difficult at all by gathering all the leequired figures.

1. Estimated selling price by checking the past 3 mths sales price of their neighbours thru hdb portal.

2. Their next flat purchase price also by checking the hdb portal.

3. The hdb or bank loan for next purchase.

4. Your CPF oa bear learn.

5. The agent fees

6. The reno fee.

I did my own estimation before selling and buying and managed to hit a tolerance of +- < > 2k with the final outcome.
Even my profits gained has a accuracy tolerance of +- 2k
you can do all the research you want, but every seller now wants to be a millionaire. They dont care what your research says
 
Back
Top