Exactly! The Nicaraguan did his sums and decided that $65 per hour is a fair wage. The American has higher overheads living in the USA so he won't work for less than $150 per hour.
Extend the argument to drivers from various parts of our globalised world and it's pretty obvious that different deals will be struck with different parts of the world. I see nothing wrong with paying different rates to different nationalities.
sure, pay a chinaman china-level wages and make him live in london. your iq is going down the drain. there's a glaring hole in your logic.
The irony is that Workers Party seems to be disinterested in labour issues like this one, least about protecting workers' right regardless of race, sex or nationality.
If you really want to help, then fight for our poor NS boys cos they were forced to do NS at slave pay! Fucking morons fighting for foreigners instead of own citizens.
I have a slightly different take. I think the ultimate aim is to create an environment that sinkies get first priority in jobs. Hence in whatever job given to FW, a very heavy levy must be imposed such that it is expensive to hire any FW. Only with this measure will employers seriously look for sinkies first, and also implement productivity improvements.I disagree violently vehemently and categorically with a nationality-blind labour and immigratiion policy. Anyone advocating such nonsense that foreign workers must be treated fairly should be condemned as anti-Singaporean. If that is the case then why Singaporeans first?
Singaporeans shld be paid and treated best, Malaysians second, PRCs and others third, and India Indians last. Any political party or politician that champions human rights on this case shows that they know nothing about the last GE issues that brought down a GRC. That is why GMS did not win and LTK did.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KWY5_wExmVA/ULTnN9a1ULI/AAAAAAAAAi0/pCBOBgVaiFw/s1600/SMRT+Strike.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="232" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KWY5_wExmVA/ULTnN9a1ULI/AAAAAAAAAi0/pCBOBgVaiFw/s320/SMRT+Strike.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Photo: TOC</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I was waiting for the various opposition parties like SDP, WP and NSP to issue statements with regards to this SMRT saga but after 48 hours of this incident, none of them have issued any press statement.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
That's why tampines voters chose MBT over him in spite of national hatred for MBT. The voters have eyes and not stupid. They will vote for a dog over MBT, and yet some people still can loseHello, how to issue statement when the matter is still under investigation?
A good politician doesn't jump the gun.
Kaptan Goh Meng Seng,
why don't you win a seat in parliament first then you can talk for all you want.
no lodging was provided to msian drivers plus msians may have to shuttle between spore and jb on their trusty cub kia while ah tiong lodging was provided and transport provided to ferry them to and fro from dorm to bus terminals. so the couple hundred different is justify.
no lodging was provided to msian drivers plus msians may have to shuttle between spore and jb on their trusty cub kia while ah tiong lodging was provided and transport provided to ferry them to and fro from dorm to bus terminals. so the couple hundred different is justify.
You do have a point there. The boys are grossly underpaid.
What matters most is, PAP is challenged!
I agree that there should be no discrimination. The sinkie and Malaysian wage should be reduced immediately.
oi, this is copyright material which i said in post #20
what i know is that the PRCs have accomodation provided, not so sure about the malaysians. but the exploitation of bus drivers has been around eversince smrt took over TIBS. my melayu friend who was a bus driver in the 80's to 90's told me that in TIBs, he still have OT with basic. after smrt took over, they abolish OT. see how the previous CEO,(i am sorry to say but i really find her very stupid!) she really screw up smrt in a big manner, from trains to buses and taxis(the screw up is still in progress...)
I disagree violently vehemently and categorically with a nationality-blind labour and immigratiion policy. Anyone advocating such nonsense that foreign workers must be treated fairly should be condemned as anti-Singaporean. If that is the case then why Singaporeans first?
Singaporeans shld be paid and treated best, Malaysians second, PRCs and others third, and India Indians last. Any political party or politician that champions human rights on this case shows that they know nothing about the last GE issues that brought down a GRC. That is why GMS did not win and LTK did.
You are blind in your emotional ranting about nationalism without real understanding of the economics behind the numbers and the implications of your mindless rhetoric.
You will end up making more Singaporeans losing their jobs with such mindset, instead of protecting Singaporeans from being replaced by foreigners. I am sad that such show of xenophobia has come from people like you.
All bus drivers will enjoy free transport from their work place if they live on Singapore. The eg given by the Malaysian is totally flawed. Singaporean drivers also enjoy free company transport. The Malaysian chose to stay in JB thus they have ride their own bikes.
Just a simple proposal to these Malaysians, would they accept the low pay like the PRC if theu y are given the same terms and accommodation?
I dont think anyone of them will take up that offer
Goh Meng Seng