GMS
When I read the article , its obvious that you playing to the NGO gallery. Why post it hear? Why not write another article to address the political angle of this strike for Singaporeans?
1. Singaporeans coming first, jobs for Singaporeans is not even a policy issue. Its a given. A govt fails if it cannot do that.
2. Labour arbitrage is not a new science. Indians, Bangladeshis, Filipinos, Indonesians, Thais, etc benefit from it and happy for the opportunity.
3. The SMRT wage negotiations were poorly handled from the 2nd quarter of this year. I am sure heads will roll. One had a huge increase while others hardly got anything.
4. Our central issue is the long dependency on cheap labour and maintaining low costs. If they had addressed productivity and up-skilled our local work force sufficiently earlier, the locals would be holding better jobs and a PRC drivers being paid $2k would not raise an eye brow.
5. Fully support minimum wage and anti discriminatory laws as these are basic. Every country in the world that have it also restricts entry of foreigners into their local workspace by a raft of measures. Its not because their civil servants got nothing better to do but to ensure that there is no local work force displacements. In developed world, low qualified new migrants drive taxi while local have engineering jobs. In Singapore ex- engineers, scientists and pmets drive taxis while low qualified migrants are found everywhere else.
In essence we got our fundamentals wrong. We focused on continuing to fuel the same economic set-up for the same result by repeatedly tweaking costs.