Now this is very clear example of an attempt to whitewash history to remove the ugly warts of PAP and present only the nice face of PAP.
The only straw you are clutching at is this "... lky has no means to defend against the British so how can he get away with UDI????"
Truly part of the PAP IB. Futile to address blurfucks.
The only straw you are clutching at is this "... lky has no means to defend against the British so how can he get away with UDI????"
Truly part of the PAP IB. Futile to address blurfucks.
hahaha.....have to disagree because the references u quoted are equally suspect....meaning they see the event at face value...
also common sense and simple logic will tell u that u that as a colony, u can only declare UDI if u have the means to oppose the master....
in 1963, lky has no means to defend against the British so how can he get away with UDI????
pse provide the link where papee mentioned without comment...i would to see the context of how it was mentioned.
Last edited: