18:10
Gillian Koh: "... takes time to establish falsehood..."
Shanmugam: "...Well, because you're not a lawyer, you're at a disadvantage. There are ways of dealing with that. Leave that to us... we'll get the experts to work on it..."
Shanmugam says he (also other lawyers) knows about a way to easily distinguish truth from falsehood. Can someone reveal what is the secret way that Shanmugam is hinting at. I really am curious to know.
"Is Mr's Clinton selling arms to ISIS?" This is a Yes/No question. Shanmugam say "No"
There were articles circulating that the reason Muamar Gaddafi was taken down was because he moved away from accepting the USD for oil export and ask for gold. How can we determine it was clear "online deliberate falsehood" and should have been taken down.
China: "Historically, for thousands of years, Diaoyu islands had been part of China"
Japan: "Historically, for thousands of years - before our ancestors landed on Japan - Senkaku islands had been part of Japan. Heaven favors the Divine race of the Divine Land"
Ask Shanmugam to declare what is true and what false so that the problem get a "clearcut" solution. This could help to avoid a WWWIII.
"There are reports saying the SG government is increasing GST to 9% because Temasek Holdings is losing money bigtime."
Shanmugam: "This is deliberate online falsehood. I want only a Yes/No comment. Yes or No?"
I am sad that I am not as smart as lawyers.:( I have to accept my fate.
Gillian Koh: "... takes time to establish falsehood..."
Shanmugam: "...Well, because you're not a lawyer, you're at a disadvantage. There are ways of dealing with that. Leave that to us... we'll get the experts to work on it..."
Shanmugam says he (also other lawyers) knows about a way to easily distinguish truth from falsehood. Can someone reveal what is the secret way that Shanmugam is hinting at. I really am curious to know.
"Is Mr's Clinton selling arms to ISIS?" This is a Yes/No question. Shanmugam say "No"
There were articles circulating that the reason Muamar Gaddafi was taken down was because he moved away from accepting the USD for oil export and ask for gold. How can we determine it was clear "online deliberate falsehood" and should have been taken down.
China: "Historically, for thousands of years, Diaoyu islands had been part of China"
Japan: "Historically, for thousands of years - before our ancestors landed on Japan - Senkaku islands had been part of Japan. Heaven favors the Divine race of the Divine Land"
Ask Shanmugam to declare what is true and what false so that the problem get a "clearcut" solution. This could help to avoid a WWWIII.
"There are reports saying the SG government is increasing GST to 9% because Temasek Holdings is losing money bigtime."
Shanmugam: "This is deliberate online falsehood. I want only a Yes/No comment. Yes or No?"
I am sad that I am not as smart as lawyers.:( I have to accept my fate.