Re: Retail Operations Manager wanted - for S'pore PR holders only, S'porean go fuck o
Change for the better or change for the worse? The opposition parties have amply demonstrated they have no intention to discuss the issues facing the minority. The minority member representation in GRCs is at most an inconvenience to parties like the WP and NSP.
So according to you everyone is a racist.
Look at it this way, the minority Singaporean does not trust the system, yet he has to be discerning as his Singaporean identity is at stake. Leaving it to blind trust and faith that the opposition parties will address their grievances is living in a fool's paradise. There is no evidence that the opposition parties have any indication to address the issues facing the minority. For all we know the minority may just as well be worse off.
Till the majority is willing to engage in participatory politics by actively seeking out and engaging the minority, my sincere advice to the minority is this - do not participate in the electoral process and tell that minority candidate not to stand on a party platform that does not seek to actively address minority issues.
Yes, everyone is a racist in some way. Even if the entire population is of one race, there will always be one segment discriminating against another segment. It just so happens that race is the easiest tool because it is very visible. This is the selfish nature of human beings. The only way to counteract it is to have institutions to keep this in check so that it does not creep into everyday life.
My friend, I am not even clear on the opposition's stand on other key issues, not to mention minority races issue. The only thing that gets in my head is that SDP fights for democracy and freedom of expression.
Since we are on this topic, I am not sure if race-based representation is the best way to go. But taking a leaf from NZ's political system, perhaps one way would be to ensure minority races have the proportionate representation in Parliament. This can be done by having the Malay/Indian voters decide whether they want to vote for Malay/Indian electoral rolls or the general electoral roll (they can only choose one). For the Malay/Indian electoral rolls (I think Eurasian community is too small to justify having a separate electoral roll), the candidates are Malay/Indian (I think even Chinese can stand as candidates if they think they can get enough support) and a certain number get voted into Parliament (they can also represent various parties or stand as independents). If the Malay/Indian voter chooses to vote in the general electoral roll, they vote for the same choice of candidates as the Chinese.
This way, it will ensure that Malays/Indians will always have sufficient representation in Parliament and the Malays/Indians get to choose who they really want to represent them (unlike the current GRC system where it is a take it or leave it kind of thing). It is also wholly possible although unlikely that the minority races become over-represented in Parliament if they garner enough support from the general electoral roll as well (this is more likely to happen than with the GRC system).
As an example, we have 84 constituencies now. These will form the general electoral roll. 15% of 84 is about 13. So let's say we have an additional 13 seats for Malay candidates. These 13 seats will represent various parts of SG (and the Malays living there) and the responsibility of these MPs will be to ensure that the Malays' views get put across in Parliament. Similarly for the Indian electoral roll.
This is just a rough sketch (I don't have time to think through the details now) and I don't think a system like this will be implemented anytime soon as it still needs to be refined and approved by the people. If you have suggestions for a system, let's hear it and maybe some political party may pick it as their platform for the elections.