Pitiful answer from Chee

[Alu862]

One of the first to do so was a European student who spoke with a German accent. "Apart from the lack of freedom of speech in Singapore, what do you think about the economy?" he enquired.

Dr Chee talked about the hollowing out of society where a majority of Singaporeans have indicated that they want to emigrate if given the chance and many are packing up. In 2007 alone 14,000 Singaporeans left the country. "That's a real problem for the economy," Dr Chee pointed out. SDP webiste

Is that all that is wrong with the Singapore economy? How about the exchange rate? Business incentives/disincentives? Working standards? Does Chee have such a narrow mind?

 

[BlueCat]

that is why with him leading the SDP,the party is a goner.
he forgets that there are always those FTs to turn to.
in fact,the government will love it,no need to subsides those FTs and they also push up the prices of properties which in turn generates a lot of stamp fees,transfer fee and so on.
their coffer will be richer.

 

[kakowi]

One of the first to do so was a European student who spoke with a German accent. "Apart from the lack of freedom of speech in Singapore, what do you think about the economy?" he enquired.
....

Freedom of speech or its lack is NOT a matter of economics but a matter of politics.

Edited: On second thoughts, to give that student the benefit of the doubt, he probably considered the two as separate issues.

 

[Adidas]

this chap is a loser,wonder how he got all his degrees.

 

[one2unite]

One of the first to do so was a European student who spoke with a German accent. "Apart from the lack of freedom of speech in Singapore, what do you think about the economy?" he enquired.

Dr Chee talked about the hollowing out of society where a majority of Singaporeans have indicated that they want to emigrate if given the chance and many are packing up. In 2007 alone 14,000 Singaporeans left the country. "That's a real problem for the economy," Dr Chee pointed out. SDP webiste

Is that all that is wrong with the Singapore economy? How about the exchange rate? Business incentives/disincentives? Working standards? Does Chee have such a narrow mind?

In other words, the PAP economic policy is not for the benefit of Singaporeans, almost half of whom had expressed their desire to emigrate.
There is no loyalty and patriotism to the country and the corrupt Lee regime knows this. That is why it had to rely heavily on foreign cheap labour from Third World countries to prop up its economy that benefits the MNCs, the GLCs, TLCs, the super rich and the money launderers.

Meanwhile, mass exodus of Singaporeans takes place but it's kept under wraps by a boot-licking propaganda mouthpiece headed by a former deputy prime minister and staffed by ISD goons.

 

[one2unite]

this chap is a loser,wonder how he got all his degrees.

He is way better than the Ass Loong who calls himself prime minister but unable to answer questions without the help of his counsel and the judge during his recent cross-examination by the Chees. What a pathetic sissy figure this guy is who needs a senior minister and a minister mentor to handhold him.

 

[marbles]

you again.

it seems i was right after all.you are a pap apologist,that or you are really out to put sdp and Dr. chee in a bad light.(but for who you do that is anyone's guess.)

you should know by now,Dr. chee did not contribute to SG's worsening problems,instead he is calling out for change.though he may not have a solution for all the problems,so does pap,worse still,pap is adding fuel to the fire.

don't keep putting the oppositions in a bad light,it makes you look really silly.

if you want to criticize Dr. Chee in a "impartial" way,at least do it with supporting facts,like presenting pap's "save the people" policies as well.

let the forummers make the comparison and come up with an opinion.not just simply "pitiful" answer from chee.

 

[Alu862]

Marbles you are also a narrow minded person. If you look at my other posts,they are not pro PAP. My concern is Dr. Chee has no policy to counter the PAP's policies. All he know is protesting wihhc is only one small step.

 

[Alu862]

If you support chee so much, have you donated to his cause? Have you joined his party? Even more, have you protested?

If you accuse me of being pro PAP, take a look at yourself Marbles.

Other political parties are terrible too, but SDP has suffered the worst defeat since Chee came to power

 

[cass888]

you again.

it seems i was right after all.you are a pap apologist,that or you are really out to put sdp and Dr. chee in a bad light.(but for who you do that is anyone's guess.)

you should know by now,Dr. chee did not contribute to SG's worsening problems,instead he is calling out for change.though he may not have a solution for all the problems,so does pap,worse still,pap is adding fuel to the fire.

don't keep putting the oppositions in a bad light,it makes you look really silly.

if you want to criticize Dr. Chee in a "impartial" way,at least do it with supporting facts,like presenting pap's "save the people" policies as well.

let the forummers make the comparison and come up with an opinion.not just simply "pitiful" answer from chee.

In politics, as an opposition party leader, you don't just say "something is wrong". You present an alternative. But the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAIELR chee soon juan will only spew his usual left wing welfare rubbish and tell you to BUY his book (my my ... to know what your position is and therefore whether to vote for you I have to BUY your book?)

 

[cass888]

He is way better than the Ass Loong who calls himself prime minister but unable to answer questions without the help of his counsel and the judge during his recent cross-examination by the Chees. What a pathetic sissy figure this guy is who needs a senior minister and a minister mentor to handhold him.

The MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan also never answers questions, if you check him out. To any question, his standard answer is that he didn't havea fair forum.

Do you see the judge overruling Gopalan Nair like they do the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan or his loony partner Yap Keng Ho or his really loony lawyer M Ravi?

 

[one2unite]

Marbles you are also a narrow minded person. If you look at my other posts,they are not pro PAP. My concern is Dr. Chee has no policy to counter the PAP's policies. All he know is protesting wihhc is only one small step.

What are PAP's policies, except to flood Singapore with foreign cheap labour from Third World countries to prop up its tottering authoritarian rule that serves the needs of MNCs, GLCs, TLCs, the super rich and the money launderers??

How to counter policies when even our former elected president Ong was told to shut up and get lost for asking details on our huge reserves and assets that are secretly handled by LKY, his incompetent, useless sissy son Loong and daughter-in-law Ho Ching??

Even our academics at the NTU were told to retract and apologise for their research paper, revealing the fact that eight out of ten jobs created are going to foreigners!!

The authoritarian Lee regime operates under a cloak of secrecy and concealment. Only when it finally falls which is inevitable, the truth will emerge like an unstoppable torrent.

 

[rodent2005]

Marbles you are also a narrow minded person. If you look at my other posts,they are not pro PAP. My concern is Dr. Chee has no policy to counter the PAP's policies. All he know is protesting wihhc is only one small step.

Please grow up lah, you expect CSJ one person to do the job of all the PAP ministers, PAP MPs, scholars and civil service combined???? How much you paying him, USD 1 trillion per year???

 

[guy2100]

Their research paper can be found on SDP website. Please visit yoursdp.org for any queries.

 

[Alu862]

The SDP has no in depth defence, economic, foreign or domestic policies to win voter cofidence. Neither has any of the oppo parties.

 

[Scolari]

The SDP has no in depth defence, economic, foreign or domestic policies to win voter cofidence. Neither has any of the oppo parties.

Ya, they should come up with more realistic plans to woo voters rather than always debating on the weakness of the PAPayas.

 

[one2unite]

The SDP has no in depth defence, economic, foreign or domestic policies to win voter cofidence. Neither has any of the oppo parties.

For a start:

Can we then have the unemployment figures for Singaporeans from the PAP government?? How many foreigners are there and where, which countries are they from??

How many MNCs, GLCs and TLCs are there?? Why are foreigners sitting on the National Wages Council to decide how much to pay the workers?? How much of our reserves have been transferred to GLCs and TLCs in the last two years??

Since the Constitution has been amended to make it unnecessary to seek the prior approval of the president for transfer of reserves, what is actually the duty of the president who is paid almost $4 mil a year??

Is there any truth in the research paper by NTU academics that eight out of ten jobs created go to foreigners?? Did they not rely on statistics and data from the MoM website for their academic research??

For whose benefit is the economy growing since most of the jobs created are for foreigners??

Information is vital for in-depth study of issues. Without transparency and accountability, there is no way in which to work out an alternative. This is a serious problem in any authoritarian regime that operates under a cloak of secrecy and concealment.

 

[one2unite]

Ya, they should come up with more realistic plans to woo voters rather than always debating on the weakness of the PAPayas.

How to "woo" voters when half of the electorate go without the right to vote in every so-called elections conducted by a dept under the Lee regime to 'fix' the opposition and 'engineer' the results??

Can you name at least one GE that was conducted fairly and freely with a free and pluralistic media for people to make informed judgement??

 

[Alu862]

Do you think the governments of other countries relase so much information to the shadow cabinets? Face it. SDP posts articles on falling Sing dollar but they do not show how they plan to raise the value. SDP posts articles on FT coming it but they do not show what they plan to do.

All THEY KNOW IS TO PROTEST.

For a start:

Can we then have the unemployment figures for Singaporeans from the PAP government?? How many foreigners are there and where, which countries are they from??

How many MNCs, GLCs and TLCs are there?? Why are foreigners sitting on the National Wages Council to decide how much to pay the workers?? How much of our reserves have been transferred to GLCs and TLCs in the last two years??

Since the Constitution has been amended to make it unnecessary to seek the prior approval of the president for transfer of reserves, what is actually the duty of the president who is paid almost $4 mil a year??

Is there any truth in the research paper by NTU academics that eight out of ten jobs created go to foreigners?? Did they not rely on statistics and data from the MoM website for their academic research??

For whose benefit is the economy growing since most of the jobs created are for foreigners??

Information is vital for in-depth study of issues. Without transparency and accountability, there is no way in which to work out an alternative. This is a serious problem in any authoritarian regime that operates under a cloak of secrecy and concealment.

 

[chinkangkor]

Do you think the governments of other countries relase so much information to the shadow cabinets?

Policy intent is in SDP manifesto. During election, PAP, WP, NSP, & SPP all did not list down policies as well, just their manifestoes.

All these policy intent will then be fleshed out by civil servants together with the party which forms the government.

Besides, 1st world countries' citizens mostly have rights to information, an independent media that provides information to the public through investigative journalism, a genuine commitment to transparency and their governments can be held accountable to the people.

We have none of these here.