• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Offer, Acceptance and Consideration

Was SC the slipper man whose PRC wife stabbed his brother dead for having an affair?

No..Slipper man was Tan Lead Shake. Slipper man, Harbans Singn are all likely pap agents to discredit Opposition
 
Last edited:
To be a politician in sinapor, one must have the same high standard as the pappies or they will expose you to utter disgrace for slightest indiscretion. Why SC not standing in coming GE? The pappies will shred him like sugar cane pulps.

The 1st generation PAP leaders had high standard and morals. Cant say the same for the present pap leaders though. I see a lot of greed and dirt in them
 
I hope that SC and ST will slip into political oblivion after this GE.

They are worse than PAP. Big traitors who undermine and sabo loyal oppositions who fight for SG and Singaporeans

They ''beat die no run type.'' Will be around for awhile. Stevie can masuk NGO. Poor Sebas hard to find a niche for him.
 
They ''beat die no run type.'' Will be around for awhile. Stevie can masuk NGO. Poor Sebas hard to find a niche for him.

They probably don't want to go into oblivion voluntarily. They hawk the notorious limelight and probably some good cash
 
They ''beat die no run type.'' Will be around for awhile. Stevie can masuk NGO. Poor Sebas hard to find a niche for him.

The questions I asked are:

1. Does NSP really think that WP will give way to NSP at Macpherson SMC now after NSP has said earlier that it will give way to WP?
2 Is NSP really looking at challenging PAP and WP at Macpherson?
3. Is the real aim of NSP to deny WP a victory at Macpherson?

I think the real NSP reason is to deny WP a victory
 
I think the real NSP reason is to deny WP a victory



It seems more and more the case that NSP's existence is to give the illusion of electoral contest but without posing an actual danger to the PAP.

On a historical note, NSP was formed in the wake of the 1987 "Marxist" detentions (Ops Spectrum), at a time when the climate of political fear in SG was very high. Either they are truly brave souls who wanted to make a stand, or they were organized by some hidden forces to make sure opposition in SG does not go completely under.

Now it seems the latter explanation is more likely.

NSP looks and behaves more and more like a mole party.
 
It seems more and more the case that NSP's existence is to give the illusion of electoral contest but without posing an actual danger to the PAP.

On a historical note, NSP was formed in the wake of the 1987 "Marxist" detentions (Ops Spectrum), at a time when the climate of political fear in SG was very high. Either they are truly brave souls who wanted to make a stand, or they were organized by some hidden forces to make sure opposition in SG does not go completely under.

Now it seems the latter explanation is more likely.

NSP looks and behaves more and more like a mole party.

Agree.....
 

Attachments

  • steeve chia.jpg
    steeve chia.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 237
Sylvia's "thank you" is a sufficient consideration. A consideration need not be monetary nor material. Ask any legal eagle

Yes, I asked some top legal eagles. A thank you is a response to a gift. A thank you is not a bargain. NSP didn't bargain for a thank you from Sylvia in return for giving up Macpherson. If anything, a thank you proves the acceptor receives the offer as a gift.

A consideration must be something of value in the eyes of law, not love or affection, let alone words expressing gratitude.
 
It seems more and more the case that NSP's existence is to give the illusion of electoral contest but without posing an actual danger to the PAP.

On a historical note, NSP was formed in the wake of the 1987 "Marxist" detentions (Ops Spectrum), at a time when the climate of political fear in SG was very high. Either they are truly brave souls who wanted to make a stand, or they were organized by some hidden forces to make sure opposition in SG does not go completely under.

Now it seems the latter explanation is more likely.

NSP looks and behaves more and more like a mole party.
I think the functions of the doggie parties has evolved over the years. Traditionally, it was to discredit opposition by having clowns like Harban singh and to split opposition votes. Back then many pap wards were returned unopposed and they still garnered overall about 70% of votes cast.

Of late, doggie parties were made to contest in wards that would otherwise had been a walkover. They are worried that the overall % of votes for pap would be less than 50%, which would be embarrassing. Without those doggie parties, pap can actually be returned with 2/3 majority but with less than 50% of the votes cast supporting them. This will happen if there are many wards enjoying walkover and their winning margins are very low while margins of losses are high.

To prevent such a result, doggie parties are put in to contest at constituencies that will otherwise be uncontested. The winning % of these wards obviously will be high with doggies making a fool of themselves to irritate the voting public and would help to push up the overall %.
 
It seems more and more the case that NSP's existence is to give the illusion of electoral contest but without posing an actual danger to the PAP.

On a historical note, NSP was formed in the wake of the 1987 "Marxist" detentions (Ops Spectrum), at a time when the climate of political fear in SG was very high. Either they are truly brave souls who wanted to make a stand, or they were organized by some hidden forces to make sure opposition in SG does not go completely under.

Now it seems the latter explanation is more likely.

NSP looks and behaves more and more like a mole party.

Also, pay attention to those who have been around for a long time. They hardly stay loyal to one party. More significantly, who were those around JBJ when he was charged in court. You will find some of them were also around when Chiam was ousted at a time SDP was rising up. No coincidence, I assure you.
 
sc is agent extraordinaire, sacrificing cushy comfort in cocksucker cadre circle to go undercover and literally under covers to conduct coital corkscrews with the countless cacophony of cuckoos. mai siao siao. ruling regime is having the last laugh. pap is da best! :D
 
There are always people who can be bought by the PAP. With billions at their disposal, the PAP can spend a billion and won't sweat abit. After all, no one knows how much GIC and Temasek have.
 
There are always people who can be bought by the PAP. With billions at their disposal, the PAP can spend a billion and won't sweat abit. After all, no one knows how much GIC and Temasek have.

some can never be bought. they have their convictions and loyalty to the hilt so much so that they will sacrifice lives and limbs for a just cause. for example, i had to reluctantly leave paradise to settle in the bay area hellhole for the sake of cuntry, honor and loyalty. someone has to do the thankless and despicable job. ;)
 
watch out this asshole
steve chia the sex maniac
 

Attachments

  • steeve chia.jpg
    steeve chia.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 133
Back
Top