- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 2,521
- Points
- 0
I suppose you meant mid-size state university in <i>America</i>?
Looks like you have a pretty high opinion of NUS. I'm not sure which ones you consider mid-size. But state universities in America are spectacular. If you judge by intellectual output, Berkeley for example is in the league of HYMPS. Schools like Michigan-Ann Arbor, Minnesota-Twin Cities, Wisconsin-Madison, UCLA, UCSD, UIUC, UT Austin, etc, all have their fair share of Nobel prize winners:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation
These universities are large state universities, with student population > 30,000
Mid-Size universities are those with moderate operating budgets below $500 million. One example is Cal Poly and they are usually good at educating undergraduate students just like NUS.
There is no way a Sinkie from NUS can win a nobel prize.
1) NUS has a very weak chemistry, physics and biological sciences base. Go look at the profiles of the professors online and you will know what I mean. With this weak base, they lose out on developing the best materials and processes.
2) NUS is more of an engineering school. Remember, scientists win nobel prizes and rarely engineers unless they initiate a brand new technology. One example of an noble prize engineer is that Hong Kong prof who did his work on fiber optical cables.
3) Now you know why PAP has to micromanage and start their own biopolis. NUS is quite hopeless when it comes to the latest things. It is more like an teaching university that is wasting your tax money.



