Let's agree to vote strategically

[GoldenDragon]

TFBH - what about GMS?

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

TFBH - what about GMS?

Hahahah GMS. I didn't even consider him. Pretty much irrelevant

 

[winnipegjets]

The top five opposition parties - minus WP - should form a coalition. Then the Opposition Coalition (OC) should work out a pact with WP not to split anti-PAP votes. Together they will takeover the government of Singapore!

 

[zeebjii]

[video=youtube;jgZeyZ7R-9I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgZeyZ7R-9I[/video]

I stopped watching after 2 minutes. Can't stand drones talking. Feels like nails against chalkboard. He's like a clone of Lui Tuck Yew. WP should sign him up, and other "English-speaking" members like Gerald Giam for public speaking courses.

http://www.dalecarnegie.com.sg/

 

[MaximiLian]

Thought earlier you say wp is ze most likely to beat the incumbents?

So why not just contest 2 more seats?

Because WP is best placed to contribute to the PAPzis losing the 2/3 majority even if, at this time they do not have the resources to contest sufficient seats to do so by themselves.

And I am happy that WP seeks to field candidates of quality, and not to just make up the quantity.

 

[winnipegjets]

If the top 5 opposition parties - minus WP - can't forge a coalition, that itself is a statement that these opposition parties are pretty darn useless.

The top 5 parties should be able to put their egos aside and work together to defeat the PAP. If they can do that, sinkees will support them.

Given the mediocre track record of the PAP over the last few years, it is not difficult to toss them out. Strong messaging is the key.

Can the top 5 opposition parties show us that they are ready to take over?

 

[HTOLAS]

Are you saying WP will not contribute to the PAPzis losing their 2/3 majority? Do you think there's another party better placed to do so? Which is it?

Thought earlier you say wp is ze most likely to beat the incumbents?

So why not just contest 2 more seats?

 

[MaximiLian]

I m saying since u said wp is ze most likely to beat the pappy "anywhere" so why not contest 30 seats to deny them 2/3 majority that you so wished for.

Are you saying WP will not contribute to the PAPzis losing their 2/3 majority? Do you think there's another party better placed to do so? Which is it?

 

[STUCK_HERE]

lol. After 20 years, fucked upside down, then this.

 

[HTOLAS]

Are you saying WP is not the most likely opposition partyu to win in a MCF anywhere they run? If not, who is?

Why they're not fielding another 2, you may want to ask them.

I m saying since u said wp is ze most likely to beat the pappy "anywhere" so why not contest 30 seats to deny them 2/3 majority that you so wished for.