• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Enough! No more money to be given to have more kids

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
5,424
Points
0
The gahment have been pumping more monies, more incentives to get more people to get married and get more kids. I say enough is enough. Who is going to pay for this and why should these group of people get priority?? Are the rest of us supposed to pay more taxes, work longer to pay for these programs??
 
The PaP made a fatal error 30 years ago to get parents to stop at 2. Then they made Sinkies and Singapore to be such a pressure cooker society that people hardly have time to catch their breath much less have kids. Worse they allowed the education infrastructure from childcare to Primary to be either screwed up or pressurizing that's its a constant pain for parents. Now they want to throw money to fix the problem that they created in the first place. Well I am against giving more money to solve this problem. I have done my dues, raised a family with no help from this gahment. If today's kids don't want to get married and have kids, that's their problem! Don't use my taxpayers monies to fix it.
 
The gahment have been pumping more monies, more incentives to get more people to get married and get more kids. I say enough is enough. Who is going to pay for this and why should these group of people get priority?? Are the rest of us supposed to pay more taxes, work longer to pay for these programs??

How much the govt pump in also no use.Sinkees are practical people.Only pap are stupid or act stupid .It's the high costs of living and job insecurity.Stupid pap !!!
 
The gahment have been pumping more monies, more incentives to get more people to get married and get more kids. I say enough is enough. Who is going to pay for this and why should these group of people get priority?? Are the rest of us supposed to pay more taxes, work longer to pay for these programs??

Looking at the behaviour of some of the kids these days, they should consider giving the parents money to have less or no kids.
 
The jokers in here constantly complain about the stop at 2 policy. That policy have been stop for more than 2 decades. The current problem have nothing to do with Stop at 2. Some of you needs to get your brains checked
 
Look at how the National CONversation is positioning this issue. They want the gahment to pay for this and that. It's a bottomless pit. Where r they going to get the monies to fund all this? I am not willing to pay a single dollar more to fund all these stuff!
 
I have a relative who voted with his feet & left with his wife & a child. In Canada he added 6 more members to his family:D

He could never have done it if he had stayed on in Spore. I doubt he would have had the time, energy, money & space :)
 
Some things done already,cannot be undone.

Yeah these kind of social engineering affects generations. Imagine if we didn't stop at 2 then, we would have more adults then, and they would have kids and so on. If our fertility rate drop, we would see the affect maybe years down the road instead of now and we would have more time to fix the problem.
 
I have a relative who voted with his feet & left with his wife & a child. In Canada he added 6 more members to his family:D

He could never have done it if he had stayed on in Spore. I doubt he would have had the time, energy, money & space :)

When they leave, the balls tend to expand together with their horizons.
 
The PaP made a fatal error 30 years ago to get parents to stop at 2.

That was more than thirty years ago and was indeed the right policy back then cos we didn't have enough jobs back then.
We should thank the govt for such good policy.

The low birth rates inspite of our much higher incomes today is a phenom that is palyed out in all developed countries, nothing to do with the govt.
We can never say costs are higher because our real purchasing power are much higher today than it was 30 or 40 years ago.
Even malays who earn much less than Chinese are having more babies so cost is not the issue but mentality of Chinese.
 

That was more than thirty years ago and was indeed the right policy back then cos we didn't have enough jobs back then.
We should thank the govt for such good policy.

The low birth rates inspite of our much higher incomes today is a phenom that is palyed out in all developed countries, nothing to do with the govt.
We can never say costs are higher because our real purchasing power are much higher today than it was 30 or 40 years ago.
Even malays who earn much less than Chinese are having more babies so cost is not the issue but mentality of Chinese.
fuck you! u so smart u wont be posting here liaoz.
 
The gahment have been pumping more monies, more incentives to get more people to get married and get more kids. I say enough is enough. Who is going to pay for this and why should these group of people get priority?? Are the rest of us supposed to pay more taxes, work longer to pay for these programs??

and someone wants longer jail-time for FTs criminals in SGP.

who is going to pay for their food and accomodation?:D
 
Last edited:

That was more than thirty years ago and was indeed the right policy back then cos we didn't have enough jobs back then.
We should thank the govt for such good policy.

The low birth rates inspite of our much higher incomes today is a phenom that is palyed out in all developed countries, nothing to do with the govt.
We can never say costs are higher because our real purchasing power are much higher today than it was 30 or 40 years ago.
Even malays who earn much less than Chinese are having more babies so cost is not the issue but mentality of Chinese.
I have no doubt if PAP has committed genocide to achieve it's population objectives then, u will have come out in support and says it was necc then. Wow, Hitler would have loved u!
 
I have no doubt if PAP has committed genocide to achieve it's population objectives then, u will have come out in support and says it was necc then. Wow, Hitler would have loved u!

Can you shows proofs that PAP commit genocide sir?
 

That was more than thirty years ago and was indeed the right policy back then cos we didn't have enough jobs back then.
We should thank the govt for such good policy.

The low birth rates inspite of our much higher incomes today is a phenom that is palyed out in all developed countries, nothing to do with the govt.
We can never say costs are higher because our real purchasing power are much higher today than it was 30 or 40 years ago.
Even malays who earn much less than Chinese are having more babies so cost is not the issue but mentality of Chinese.


No, it was a short sighted & a biased policy.
The policy targeted at "lesser mortals" without degrees. Families with mothers who had degree were exempted.

You have to wonder who came up with this half-baked policy. Probably the old fart:rolleyes: Any sociologist or economist could have told the PAP that populations will fall once people had jobs. This reality was being observed in other economies.

You have to wonder what they were thinking, back then Spore only had a population of 2+ million. Look at todays population of 5+ million:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Lee Does It On Purpose

The gahment have been pumping more monies, more incentives to get more people to get married and get more kids. I say enough is enough. Who is going to pay for this and why should these group of people get priority?? Are the rest of us supposed to pay more taxes, work longer to pay for these programs??


Lee Snr does it on purpose. He doesn't care about our 'stupid' heritage. It's an INC. Remember this well that capitalists have no allegiance or loyalty to a state; what's that to them ? Money is all they want.

He must be singing John Lenon's Imagine.

Imagine if there's no voters,
I sibey song ...

You may say I'm a dreamer
And I hope there's no one
...
And the world is now mine.
 
Yes Old fart made the call that caused us to be in this state 30 -40 years later. Actually we felt the effect end of 90s but as usual they tried putting scotch tape over the widening fissures and it became the full blown crisis today.
 
Back
Top