• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Dynastic Succession - Murbarak Gabra

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,975
Points
83
In autocratic regimes, dynastic successions are out of favour. The chink regime, despite loving to steamroll their peasants using tanks driven by gangster PLA baboons, frowned on Dynastic Succession. If history is a good example, when Yuan Shikai tried a similar stunt in 1916, his lackeys and minions balked when they realized chinese peasants are sick of kowtowing emperors. In that respect, the old Peanut, Chiang KS of Taiwan did better than Yuan, he managed to pass power to his son despite a good beating that the commies gave him in 1949.

The Catholic Church, another long lasting polity is aware that dynastic succession will bring much grief. But they need to justify their founder's special credentials, a virgin birth was necessary to placate lesser peasants and no attempted was made on the matter of dynastic succession after Christ passed away.

Hence on planet earth, the most loathsome regimes still practice dynastic succession. One example is North Korea, a surreal republic where the Kims will stop at nothing to ensure their vice grip on power. The Nehs, despite calling themselves the largest democracy on Earth, is nothing but a banana republic that adores political successions. Things turned for the worst when they fool themselves into believing an Italian could morph into a neh?!

Mubarak is simply another clueless tinpot. The Indonesians have proclaimed that dynastic succession dies with the greedy Suharto and Egypt is probably on the same developmental track with Indonesia. The Old Pharaoh, surrounded by bootlickers who stand to gain with status quo probably misled their master that the Egyptians will do the Cina Kowtow. All that came crashing down when his military lackeys decided that dynastic succession is on the sunset in the Middle East.
 
USA also got mah even in recent times---> Bush to Bush, and nearly Clinton to Clinton. ;)

In autocratic regimes, dynastic successions are out of favour. The chink regime, despite loving to steamroll their peasants using tanks driven by gangster PLA baboons, frowned on Dynastic Succession. If history is a good example, when Yuan Shikai tried a similar stunt in 1916, his lackeys and minions balked when they realized chinese peasants are sick of kowtowing emperors. In that respect, the old Peanut, Chiang KS of Taiwan did better than Yuan, he managed to pass power to his son despite a good beating that the commies gave him in 1949.

The Catholic Church, another long lasting polity is aware that dynastic succession will bring much grief. But they need to justify their founder's special credentials, a virgin birth was necessary to placate lesser peasants and no attempted was made on the matter of dynastic succession after Christ passed away.

Hence on planet earth, the most loathsome regimes still practice dynastic succession. One example is North Korea, a surreal republic where the Kims will stop at nothing to ensure their vice grip on power. The Nehs, despite calling themselves the largest democracy on Earth, is nothing but a banana republic that adores political successions. Things turned for the worst when they fool themselves into believing an Italian could morph into a neh?!

Mubarak is simply another clueless tinpot. The Indonesians have proclaimed that dynastic succession dies with the greedy Suharto and Egypt is probably on the same developmental track with Indonesia. The Old Pharaoh, surrounded by bootlickers who stand to gain with status quo probably misled their master that the Egyptians will do the Cina Kowtow. All that came crashing down when his military lackeys decided that dynastic succession is on the sunset in the Middle East.
 
The media's focus on the Egypt shit is all wrong. Fuckers got no clue what is most important in the whole shitty saga. It is not how PAP should now monitor FB and twits more, or how people can get so tulan and start some stupid rebellion.

The most important issue is, will Middle East now go on a fast advance like China did 30 years ago? If this will happen, then USA is really shitting in its pants. Because after ceding power to China and having to recognise China is upcoming superpower, USA may now have to deal with Middle East challanging the current superpower arrangement of giving USA so much shitty bullying power.

The demise of USA as a superpower may come quicker than we thought possible. And this time, it is not because of China. But an upcoming Middle East free of USA control coupled with China. 2 foes at the same time. USA must be shitting in their pants right now.
 
Back
Top