Chitchat Why Sinkie PAP Regime Lost Touch With Peasants Whom They Once Fought For Against Brits

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,975
Points
83
Somewhere out there, Ruler Loong ain't happy, he worked his guts out for peasants but they just embarassed his regime in Procedural General Erection 2020 with another slap .... so he asked his top performers some theoretical questions ...

question1.jpg
 
Peasants' Representative Tin likely to give that standard answer based on her observation of Angry Teochew's groundwork in Hougang and her own back breaking toils .......

first-answer.jpg
 
Last edited:
Undaunted, Ruler Loong rephrases his theoretical question ...

question2.png
 
Last edited:
20 years ago, PAP is an elitist and arrogant party.KNNCCB to PAP !
 
If they have to toe the party line, how are they gonna speak up for the peasants?

answer1.jpg
 
The saying
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. This is what happens the the PAPigs.
 
Should have done what the Hongkies were doing (minus the PRC meddling after 1997).

One group jaga town councils and municipal issues in their districts, one group jaga the legislative (lawmaking), the third group is the executive branch: ministers and one of them the chief executive or PM). Each group has their own individual election.

Both Sinkieland and Hong Kong used to be Brit colonies, the inherited political system should have been quite similar. The difference is that the Brits had a few more decades to refine the system in Hong Kong, while LKY started fixing the oppos in the 1980s and pave the way for his feckless son to ascend the throne. :rolleyes:
 
I warned all of you the Worker's Party is the best opposition party.
 
Somewhere out there, Ruler Loong ain't happy, he worked his guts out for peasants but they just embarassed his regime in Procedural General Erection 2020 with another slap .... so he asked his top performers some theoretical questions ...

View attachment 86413

Easy to understand why she got 71% votes. Nothing to do with her hard work; this is bullshit. Had she been given a tough opponent from WP, she might have home crying. She is one of those elites running in pappies. How could she be for and with the peasants?
 
Imagine at her age and working experience she's a millionaire since joining pappies.
 
Easy to understand why she got 71% votes. Nothing to do with her hard work; this is bullshit. Had she been given a tough opponent from WP, she might have home crying. She is one of those elites running in pappies. How could she be for and with the peasants?
Nicole damn stupid never contest against her. Anyway, Nicole is a goner like GMS.
 
Should have done what the Hongkies were doing (minus the PRC meddling after 1997).

One group jaga town councils and municipal issues in their districts, one group jaga the legislative (lawmaking), the third group is the executive branch: ministers and one of them the chief executive or PM). Each group has their own individual election.

Both Sinkieland and Hong Kong used to be Brit colonies, the inherited political system should have been quite similar. The difference is that the Brits had a few more decades to refine the system in Hong Kong, while LKY started fixing the oppos in the 1980s and pave the way for his feckless son to ascend the throne. :rolleyes:

HK belongs to China; an undeniable facts of life. No matter what other countries can bellow and rant over politics in HK, China will not allow outsiders to decide how HK should be run. 50 years of free rein for HK is just written on paper. The commies always never believe in written paper if their national security is threatened. After all, HK is just outside their front door.

As for SG, it belongs to the locals, and not to any other country. Float or sink, LKY knew what to do. Some people might have hated him for what he had done but then facts are undeniable facts. Without LKY and his team standing up against the extremists next door, SG might have been a part of mudland today. No Pappies, no WP. So, apples and oranges cannot be compared.
 
Nicole damn stupid never contest against her. Anyway, Nicole is a goner like GMS.

Better to let NS stand in EC to try win in GRC against pappies than to stand in SMC. Which is better? Winning 1 seat or winning 4 seats? The pappies knew chances of losing EC GRC very high, so they parachuted Ah Keat from Tampines to block WP from pau chiak EC. If no Ah Keat in EC, this GRC likely gone to WP.

NS never to go away; she will as actor Arnold Robocop said "I'll be back". She will be in Parliament one day, no doubt.
 
Better to let NS stand in EC to try win in GRC against pappies than to stand in SMC. Which is better? Winning 1 seat or winning 4 seats? The pappies knew chances of losing EC GRC very high, so they parachuted Ah Keat from Tampines to block WP from pau chiak EC. If no Ah Keat in EC, this GRC likely gone to WP.

NS never to go away; she will as actor Arnold Robocop said "I'll be back". She will be in Parliament one day, no doubt.

I give Nicole one more chance if not she should just go and live a good life with Bryan. TPL is the one, unfortunately.
 
Back
Top