SMRT Strike - The National Interest Perspective

[Goh Meng Seng]

<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KWY5_wExmVA/ULTnN9a1ULI/AAAAAAAAAi0/pCBOBgVaiFw/s1600/SMRT+Strike.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="232" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KWY5_wExmVA/ULTnN9a1ULI/AAAAAAAAAi0/pCBOBgVaiFw/s320/SMRT+Strike.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Photo: TOC</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I was waiting for the various opposition parties like SDP, WP and NSP to issue statements with regards to this SMRT saga but after 48 hours of this incident, none of them have issued any press statement.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The irony is that Workers Party seems to be disinterested in labour issues like this one, least about protecting workers' right regardless of race, sex or nationality. National Solidarity Party is no longer interested to stand in solidarity with the workers' right to point out the flaws of the inadequate labour law we have in Singapore. Most surprisingly of all, the most vocal Singapore Democratic Party which has fought so hard on human rights and democratic issues has been unusually silent when human rights of the drivers were violated when they were forced to have medical check up against their will.&nbsp; </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Most likely, they thought that this is all about foreign workers and have nothing to do with Singaporeans. Furthermore, it is obvious that the PRC drivers were right in claiming unfair and discriminating wage treatment but partisan politicians fear that by acknowledging this simple fact, they may agitate their supporters. This is especially so when anti-FT policy and xenophobia is running all time high in Singapore.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Thus, it is "politically savvy" to stay away from this hot potato! It is quite disappointing indeed. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
We Singaporeans do not like strikes or industrial actions, especially those that could cause great inconvenience to us. This applies to a strike in the public transport system like the one we have in SMRT. There are rules and laws to be followed. Many Singaporeans have expressed their anger on why these PRC drivers who went on strike didn't get locked up and charged in court. Apparently, the PAP government is reacting to this pressure now.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
While we want preserve our rule of law and our good image as a "stable country with harmonious industrial relationship" in order to attract foreign investors, we must also understand the bigger picture and the implications behind this industrial relationship hiccup.&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-P5SjJoEVhS4/ULTumaC-ARI/AAAAAAAAAjE/ovelyp8paUE/s1600/Discriminating+Wages.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="134" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-P5SjJoEVhS4/ULTumaC-ARI/AAAAAAAAAjE/ovelyp8paUE/s320/Discriminating+Wages.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Now, take a good look at the above data sheet derived from SMRT on the wages it set for its drivers. What's wrong with it?<br />
<br />
It classifies wages according to Nationality. The simple fact that SMRT has classified wages according to Nationality is in itself a discriminating act. It is totally unacceptable.<br />
<br />
I have talked about the lack of Anti-discrimination Employment law in Singapore since many years ago. Places like Hong Kong has set up Equal Opportunity Commission to look into complains of discriminating employment practices. In spite of having Anti-discriminating concept written in Singapore's Constitution (Article 12), there is nothing written in our Employment Act that uphold this spirit of Constitution at all. It just stays as a "Highfalutin" idea.<br />
<br />
This SMRT strike has put Singapore in a very bad spotlight internationally. It exposes Singapore as a place that condones discrimination in employment. It is in our National interest to right this wrong and opposition parties should be pushing for anti-discrimination employment law! We do not want to be seen as a place that condones modern slavery, do we?<br />
<br />
Some Singaporeans may cry foul and argue that why should we treat foreigners equally in employment in Singapore? Why should we give them equal or fair wages?<br />
<br />
It is in the interests of our workers to uphold equal and fair wages for foreign workers. PAP and businesses have claimed that they only turn to employing foreign workers because they can't find local Singaporeans to take up the jobs. But is this true?<br />
<br />
When you allow businesses to use lower wages to employ foreign workers, just like the case in SMRT, inevitably you will be encouraging them to displace local Singaporeans as much as the FT quota allows! The reason for them to employ foreign workers have changed; it is not due to the difficulties in finding Singaporeans to employ but rather, they are substituting the more expensive Singaporeans to reduce cost!<br />
<br />
If we have anti-discrimination law that dictates that everybody will have to be paid on equal terms, then the cost of employment of foreign workers will be higher than employing Singaporeans when government levies are taken into account. This will discourage companies from employing foreign workers indiscriminately just to replace Singaporeans for the sake of cost cutting. Companies will only turn to foreign workers when it is totally necessary because it would incur higher cost. This will align us to the concept of letting companies to employ foreigners if only if they cannot find Singaporeans to do the job.<br />
<br />
Thus, insisting equal wage terms for foreign workers will in fact protect Singaporeans from being displaced. This will cut down our over reliance on foreign workers which could become a vital factor in unstablizing our social structure.<br />
<br />
So far, both SMRT and PAP government have mismanaged the SMRT Strike quite badly. Apparently they don't understand the PRC's culture well enough. Strikes in China are very common nowadays and they should not be ignorant about that. Unlike Singaporeans, they will fight for their rights when there is a perception of unfairness. Furthermore, PRCs are very Nationalistic in nature. <br />
<br />
Well, from the observation of how the PRCs reacted to the DiaoYu Dao dispute, you will see that they will go all out on Nationalistic sentiments. The new Chinese leadership has tried very hard not to be seen as weaklings when it comes to sovereignty issue. Japan is a large country and it may be forgiven for not able to resolve the matter easily.<br />
<br />
However, if the PRCs are to be seen as being discriminated and bullied by a little red dot like Singapore, the new Chinese leadership will face even greater pressure and obstacles in establishing&nbsp; its legitimacy. How would it react?<br />
<br />
If the PAP government is to use its usual hard ball political methodology to deal with the PRC drivers in SMRT who went into strike, it would be seen as a "persecution " over discriminating practices. Even if the Chinese leadership does not want to do anything about it, what do you think the common citizens in China would do or react? When Nationality is involved in discrimination, it will no longer be our "internal issue".<br />
<br />
It is not in our National interests to endanger the lives of thousands of Singaporeans who are working and doing business in China over some disgraceful discriminating acts of a GLC like SMRT. I have no problem in making sacrifices to defend our land and sovereignty but it would be very silly for us to make sacrifices for the disgraceful discriminating acts of a company which exploited the FT policy for its own benefits.<br />
<br />
Some may argue that these PRC drivers should go according to their contracts but when a contract defies good nature practices, breaches natural justice and fairness, it should be viewed as invalid.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, SMRT has forced these PRC drivers to be medically examined even though they may have provided Medical Certificates to apply for medical leaves. Such act is unacceptable and has created unnecessary doubts on the professionalism of those doctors who have issued the medical certificates in the first place! Such move has further damaged Singapore's international image and has unnecessarily put our medical doctors on international trial.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
SMRT and the authorities should back track, resolve the issue with proper tact. The only way the government could resolve this issue is to handle it FAIRLY and JUSTLY.&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
For a start, the government should denounce SMRT's disgraceful discriminating practices and order it to right the wrongs. It could even take a step further to declare that it will look into enacting anti-discrimination laws to protect the rights of workers. It should also review its FT policy as well. On the other hand, it could issue a formal warning or reprimand to the PRC drivers and set up a union or mechanism for them to utilize in future similar event.&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Even if the government chose to charge these PRC drivers in court, the negative impact would be significantly reduced because the SMRT has been dealt with for its discriminating practices. Charging these PRC drivers without addressing the perceived wrongs of discrimination by SMRT would put Singapore in a very bad light internationally and may even ignite anti-Singapore sentiments in China which could put our citizens at risk there.&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
SMRT and the PAP government are only concerned about the damages this strike would do to them as in compromising their authority. They should look at the bigger picture on the international impact of this strike. It has far more implications on the good image and reputation of Singapore as a modern country internationally.&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
We should not be viewed as country that condones unfair and discriminating practices of exploiting nature. We should not let this saga damages our medical doctors' international standing as well. We have suffered enough as a Nation from the various mishandling of this strike and we should demand PAP government to right the very wrong, the root of the whole problem by enacting Anti-Discrimination laws in our employment act.&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Goh Meng Seng</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>

 

[zhihau]

agree on the point that foreign workers of different nationalities should be placed on the wage scale. have to be fair by giving them equal benefits.

 

[TracyTan866]

agree on the point that foreign workers of different nationalities should be placed on the wage scale. have to be fair by giving them equal benefits.

agree.....businesses should not exploit their workers. exploitation is a myopic management style

 

[Leongsam]

I agree that there should be no discrimination. The sinkie and Malaysian wage should be reduced immediately.

 

[eatshitndie]

agree on the point that foreign workers of different nationalities should be placed on the wage scale. have to be fair by giving them equal benefits.

and this principle should also apply to maids, domestic servants, domestic helpers, nannies, car washers, window washers, babysitters, etc.

 

[Devil Within]

Why not go one step further and have EVERYONE getting same pay! You fucking communist pigs! I see so many dumb fucks here don't understand about free market principles. If not happy, can resign, nobody forces them to work here.

If you really want to help, then fight for our poor NS boys cos they were forced to do NS at slave pay! Fucking morons fighting for foreigners instead of own citizens.

 

[TracyTan866]

and this principle should also apply to maids, domestic servants, domestic helpers, nannies, car washers, window washers, babysitters, etc.

agree...pay everyone their job worth in SG, regardless where they are from.

 

[Getloud]

agree.....businesses should not exploit their workers. exploitation is a myopic management style

From business point of view, all fixed cost are high in SG, e.g. Rental, COE, raw material, etc.
Except for employee's salary, which businessman can exploit, to lower their cost and maximise profit.
But if rental and cost of transport can be lowered, those bosses with a heart may move some extra cash to their employee's bonus.

 

[TracyTan866]

From business point of view, all fixed cost are high in SG, e.g. Rental, COE, raw material, etc.
Except for employee's salary, which businessman can exploit, to lower their cost and maximise profit.
But if rental and cost of transport can be lowered, those bosses with a heart may move some extra cash to their employee's bonus.

the pap's unwise policies have made SG not competitive. costs is not wages alone.

the pap must go down to the root cause of non competitiveness rather than just harping on wages

 

[kingrant]

I disagree violently vehemently and categorically with a nationality-blind labour and immigratiion policy. Anyone advocating such nonsense that foreign workers must be treated fairly should be condemned as anti-Singaporean. If that is the case then why Singaporeans first?

Singaporeans shld be paid and treated best, Malaysians second, PRCs and others third, and India Indians last. Any political party or politician that champions human rights on this case shows that they know nothing about the last GE issues that brought down a GRC. That is why GMS did not win and LTK did.

 

[eatshitndie]

agree...pay everyone their job worth in SG, regardless where they are from.

i was being sarcastic with my eyeroll.

 

[ahkow]

I disagree violently vehemently and categorically with a nationality-blind labour and immigratiion policy. Anyone advocating such nonsense that foreign workers must be treated fairly should be condemned as anti-Singaporean. If that is the case then why Singaporeans first?

Singaporeans shld be paid and treated best, Malaysians second, PRCs and others third, and India Indians last. Any political party or politician that champions human rights on this case shows that they know nothing about the last GE issues that brought down a GRC. That is why GMS did not win and LTK did.

GMS is living in HK and his wife is now a civil servant in HK. So he feel compel to kowtow to the PRC a bit more, I guess.

 

[kingrant]

Malaysian and Singaporeans have been very close and there are people on families and relations on both sides. We were one until politicians screwed us up and politics came along, merger and Malaysia and then Separation. Malaysians - whether Chinese, Malays or Indians - are closer to our habits, norms, culture, values and customs than PRCs and the other recent arrivals from Myanmar, Pinoyland, India etc. Why I said M'sians shld still be treated slightly differently is that they only shuttle here to work and enjoy lower COL back home. PRCs are hired thru the failed PAP immigration policy because they are hungry enough to accept even lower wages to come over to work. If they do not like the wage difference, by all means, they are free to go back. After all, China is improving now and opportunities now abound. They dont have to stay here and create trouble and hope to beguile naive politicians into supporting their cause and action, which is illegal.

 

[Leongsam]

i was being sarcastic with my eyeroll.

When this forum went down last year and I couldn't figure out what was wrong, I posted the job of repairing the database on elance.com.

I got 4 responses within 24 hours. Two were from India so based on racial stereotyping, I struck them off the shortlist immediately. It was down to 2. One was based in the USA. He quoted $150 per hour. The other was based in Nicaragua. He quoted $65 per hour.

Did I exploit the Nicaraguan?

 

[kingrant]

The more reason he shld shut the fuck up because he has lost touch with the sentiments here by staying in HK.
He shld ask HKies what they think about the recent locust swarms.

GMS is living in HK and his wife is now a civil servant in HK. So he feel compel to kowtow to the PRC a bit more, I guess.

 

[eatshitndie]

Did I exploit the Nicaraguan?

it's not when it's the best bid based on global demand and supply.

 

[Leongsam]

it's not when it's the best bid based on global demand and supply.

Exactly! The Nicaraguan did his sums and decided that $65 per hour is a fair wage. The American has higher overheads living in the USA so he won't work for less than $150 per hour.

Extend the argument to drivers from various parts of our globalised world and it's pretty obvious that different deals will be struck with different parts of the world. I see nothing wrong with paying different rates to different nationalities.

 

[kingrant]

In post #4, you said there shld be no wage difference between Singaporeans and malaysians ??

Exactly! The Nicaraguan did his sums and decided that $65 per hour is a fair wage. The American has higher overheads living in the USA so he won't work for less than $150 per hour.

Extend the argument to drivers from various parts of our globalised world and it's pretty obvious that different deals will be struck with different parts of the world. I see nothing wrong with paying different rates to different nationalities.

 

[eatshitndie]

Exactly! The Nicaraguan did his sums and decided that $65 per hour is a fair wage. The American has higher overheads living in the USA so he won't work for less than $150 per hour.

Extend the argument to drivers from various parts of our globalised world and it's pretty obvious that different deals will be struck with different parts of the world. I see nothing wrong with paying different rates to different nationalities.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2012-07/06/content_15555503.htm

Beijing tops the list of employees' salary with an average monthly pay of 4,672 yuan ($730) among the 23 provinces and cities that recently published the statistics, chinanews.com reported Friday.

Shanghai follows with an average monthly salary of 4,331 yuan and Gansu province is at the bottom of the list with a monthly average wage of 2,742 yuan, according to statistics published by local authorities.

The average annual salary of urban non-private employees reached 42,452 yuan in 2011, 14.3 percent more than the average salary of 37,147 yuan in 2010. The actual growth rate is 8.5 percent if inflation is deducted, according to National Bureau of Statistics.

 

[krafty]

what i know is that the PRCs have accomodation provided, not so sure about the malaysians. but the exploitation of bus drivers has been around eversince smrt took over TIBS. my melayu friend who was a bus driver in the 80's to 90's told me that in TIBs, he still have OT with basic. after smrt took over, they abolish OT. see how the previous CEO,(i am sorry to say but i really find her very stupid!) she really screw up smrt in a big manner, from trains to buses and taxis(the screw up is still in progress...:p)