To the young, living to age 100 feels like a fantasy, and even reaching retirement seems like many lifetimes away. Yet, to the Beatles generation, When I'm Sixty-Four is no longer just a catchy song but a reality.
While the younger generation is duly preoccupied with whether they will have enough in their Central Provident Fund (CPF) account to buy their first home, the larger picture is that nearly half the population will live to 85, a quarter will live past 90 and almost 4 per cent will be centenarians.
To the potential Golden Ager, the prospect of outliving one's resources is all too real given rising standards of living and healthcare costs.
Furthermore, most of those living past 90 will not be able to depend on their children (if they have any) as they too will be retired.
So what policy changes should we consider to ensure our senior citizens receive better health financing and security post retirement? And how should such extended benefits be paid for?
http://www.todayonline.com/Commenta...025/Covering-our-super-seniors-for-a-lifetime
While the younger generation is duly preoccupied with whether they will have enough in their Central Provident Fund (CPF) account to buy their first home, the larger picture is that nearly half the population will live to 85, a quarter will live past 90 and almost 4 per cent will be centenarians.
To the potential Golden Ager, the prospect of outliving one's resources is all too real given rising standards of living and healthcare costs.
Furthermore, most of those living past 90 will not be able to depend on their children (if they have any) as they too will be retired.
So what policy changes should we consider to ensure our senior citizens receive better health financing and security post retirement? And how should such extended benefits be paid for?
http://www.todayonline.com/Commenta...025/Covering-our-super-seniors-for-a-lifetime