Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
PG IS PANG GANG, Plead g.....?
PG IS PANG GANG, Plead g.....?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct”
- Thread starter xingguy
- Start date
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
You mean the entire court got more than 1 Bayi? I thought the same Bayi is the prosecutor, defendant's lawyer, judge, court security officer, night watchman and cleaner? btw. Singapore no jury lei...
You mean the entire court got more than 1 Bayi? I thought the same Bayi is the prosecutor, defendant's lawyer, judge, court security officer, night watchman and cleaner? btw. Singapore no jury lei...
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
Have to disagree. One cannot take one part and refuses another. Settlement has to be total and complete. If not, no portion should prejudice the other.
For example, a man promises to marry a woman but he needs to circumcise and she asks him for a ring.
He went ahead to circumcise and bought her a 5 carat ring. She said the ring size bought is a derisory to her and expects a bigger one.
He cannot afford a bigger one and she says he has broken his promise to marry her. However, he still wants to marry her, but according to
the original terms issued.
So, in gist, there is no deal. It's like the two twain never met. So, there is no admission on any level. In fact, since he has circumcised, he has shown his intention to marry her and hence keep the promise, but as long as she does not accept the 5 carat ring, she has actually caused him undue suffering for the circumcision because she never made it clear beforehand she will not accept a 5 carat ring and considered it derisory.
This is the issue here. Can the man blame the woman for his circumcision?
Have to disagree. One cannot take one part and refuses another. Settlement has to be total and complete. If not, no portion should prejudice the other.
For example, a man promises to marry a woman but he needs to circumcise and she asks him for a ring.
He went ahead to circumcise and bought her a 5 carat ring. She said the ring size bought is a derisory to her and expects a bigger one.
He cannot afford a bigger one and she says he has broken his promise to marry her. However, he still wants to marry her, but according to
the original terms issued.
So, in gist, there is no deal. It's like the two twain never met. So, there is no admission on any level. In fact, since he has circumcised, he has shown his intention to marry her and hence keep the promise, but as long as she does not accept the 5 carat ring, she has actually caused him undue suffering for the circumcision because she never made it clear beforehand she will not accept a 5 carat ring and considered it derisory.
This is the issue here. Can the man blame the woman for his circumcision?
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
If that is the case, we should have 100% peoples voting for PAP... Since our Prime Minister always ask us to vote for PAP during election... I can see about 40% not listening... So how big a PM can be???
If that is the case, we should have 100% peoples voting for PAP... Since our Prime Minister always ask us to vote for PAP during election... I can see about 40% not listening... So how big a PM can be???
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
Plead Guilty....
Plead Guilty....
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
ISD fucked his arse many times. Thats why he wants them to do it to everyone else.
ISD fucked his arse many times. Thats why he wants them to do it to everyone else.
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
This is what will happen when Sinkieland has a truly independent Law Society
Not one whose Council members are made up of goons appointed by Gahbrament
Porlumpars abound in this world and former AG Elsie is a prime example
She did not prosecute Sing Tao chairwoman and Haw Par descendent for fraud
Reason is to do so would cause a lot of Sing Tao employees to lose their job
Wow, a crap reason that will make Sinkieland’s Melon and Chong look good
Yuen is now singing a tune different from what he had sung in a different role
But fear not for an independent press and Law Society will remind him and all
Sinkieland’s a paradise where FamiLEE reigns supreme and blind faith prevails
This is what will happen when Sinkieland has a truly independent Law Society
Not one whose Council members are made up of goons appointed by Gahbrament
Porlumpars abound in this world and former AG Elsie is a prime example
She did not prosecute Sing Tao chairwoman and Haw Par descendent for fraud
Reason is to do so would cause a lot of Sing Tao employees to lose their job
Wow, a crap reason that will make Sinkieland’s Melon and Chong look good
Yuen is now singing a tune different from what he had sung in a different role
But fear not for an independent press and Law Society will remind him and all
Sinkieland’s a paradise where FamiLEE reigns supreme and blind faith prevails
Last edited:
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
For commentary, please see the preceding post.
Hong Kong barristers hit out at Beijing’s white paper, vow to protect judicial independence
Bar Association criticises the placing of judges in same category as top officials as 'erroneous' and pledges to defend judicial independence
Barristers have come out in strong defence of Hong Kong's judicial independence, a day after the central government published an unprecedented white paper outlining Beijing's "comprehensive jurisdiction" over the city.
The Bar Association said it was "erroneous" for Beijing to place local judges in the same category as "Hong Kong's administrators", including the chief executive and top officials.
While courts elsewhere might "sing in unison" with the government, that was not the case in Hong Kong, it said.
"Any erroneous public categorisation of judges and judicial officers as 'administrators' or official exhortation for them to carry out any political mission or task" would send out the wrong message to Hongkongers and the international community, it said.
In the white paper, issued by the State Council on Tuesday, Beijing suggests judges "have on their shoulders the responsibility of correctly understanding and implementing the Basic Law".
It also says administrators - including, for Beijing, judges - have a "basic political requirement" to love the country.
The Bar Association took exception to the paper categorising judges as administrators and officially ordering them to fulfil political roles.
That sent out a message that Hong Kong courts were not independent, it said.
Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung disagreed with the association.
He said last night: "People need not be overly sensitive or read too much into certain wordings. I hope people will read the entire white paper in a positive attitude and not from the view of a conspiracy theory."
The association also cited its own remarks, made in 2008 when it was chaired by Yuen, which read: "The judiciary in Hong Kong has always been, and under the Basic Law it shall remain, separate and independent from the executive and the legislature".
But Yuen said the comment was not relevant in this case as the judiciary was part of the political structure, not the governance team. Elsie Leung Oi-sie, deputy director of the Basic Law Committee, said the judiciary was part of the city's political structure under the Basic Law.
"There is no conflict between judges performing their duties independently, without fear and favour, and safeguarding national interests as Hong Kong residents," said Leung, a former justice secretary.
The Basic Law states Hong Kong courts shall exercise judicial power independently and free from any interference, she noted.
Former association chairman Ronny Tong Ka-wah, now a Civic Party lawmaker, felt the white paper had misunderstood the city's judicial system.
"There are many foreign judges in Hong Kong," he noted. "To ask them to be patriots means they should be close to government - but then how can Hong Kong keep its rule of law?"
The Law Society, which regulates the city's solicitors, declined to comment immediately.
Vice-president Thomas So Shiu-tsung said he saw no change in Beijing's attitude on the city's judicial independence.
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...ers-deliver-stern-rebuke-beijings-white-paper
For commentary, please see the preceding post.
Hong Kong barristers hit out at Beijing’s white paper, vow to protect judicial independence
Bar Association criticises the placing of judges in same category as top officials as 'erroneous' and pledges to defend judicial independence
Barristers have come out in strong defence of Hong Kong's judicial independence, a day after the central government published an unprecedented white paper outlining Beijing's "comprehensive jurisdiction" over the city.
The Bar Association said it was "erroneous" for Beijing to place local judges in the same category as "Hong Kong's administrators", including the chief executive and top officials.
While courts elsewhere might "sing in unison" with the government, that was not the case in Hong Kong, it said.
"Any erroneous public categorisation of judges and judicial officers as 'administrators' or official exhortation for them to carry out any political mission or task" would send out the wrong message to Hongkongers and the international community, it said.
In the white paper, issued by the State Council on Tuesday, Beijing suggests judges "have on their shoulders the responsibility of correctly understanding and implementing the Basic Law".
It also says administrators - including, for Beijing, judges - have a "basic political requirement" to love the country.
The Bar Association took exception to the paper categorising judges as administrators and officially ordering them to fulfil political roles.
That sent out a message that Hong Kong courts were not independent, it said.
Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung disagreed with the association.
He said last night: "People need not be overly sensitive or read too much into certain wordings. I hope people will read the entire white paper in a positive attitude and not from the view of a conspiracy theory."
The association also cited its own remarks, made in 2008 when it was chaired by Yuen, which read: "The judiciary in Hong Kong has always been, and under the Basic Law it shall remain, separate and independent from the executive and the legislature".
But Yuen said the comment was not relevant in this case as the judiciary was part of the political structure, not the governance team. Elsie Leung Oi-sie, deputy director of the Basic Law Committee, said the judiciary was part of the city's political structure under the Basic Law.
"There is no conflict between judges performing their duties independently, without fear and favour, and safeguarding national interests as Hong Kong residents," said Leung, a former justice secretary.
The Basic Law states Hong Kong courts shall exercise judicial power independently and free from any interference, she noted.
Former association chairman Ronny Tong Ka-wah, now a Civic Party lawmaker, felt the white paper had misunderstood the city's judicial system.
"There are many foreign judges in Hong Kong," he noted. "To ask them to be patriots means they should be close to government - but then how can Hong Kong keep its rule of law?"
The Law Society, which regulates the city's solicitors, declined to comment immediately.
Vice-president Thomas So Shiu-tsung said he saw no change in Beijing's attitude on the city's judicial independence.
http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...ers-deliver-stern-rebuke-beijings-white-paper
Re: Roy Ngerng Fired From Tan Tock Seng Hospital For “Improper Public PUBLIC Conduct
Make up your mind. Are you pro Roy or against him? Or are you a schizo?
Make up your mind. Are you pro Roy or against him? Or are you a schizo?
Similar threads
