-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Breaking News!Pastor Kong Hee And Pastors Arrested And Charge!
- Thread starter Talking Donkey
- Start date
:(
Kong Hee, James Phang and Lee Kuan Yew - what do they have in common?
All ex RI?
Maybe you can look for the tick tick tong guy from some lighthouse in the East, they call Tampaines. For contact number please call ISD for reference.
Some feedback from his supporters from Yahoo news:
"I still believe he will come out spotless from all this -- he's a man of God and we believe in him," said teacher Alicia Goh, 29, who attends the church regularly with her husband and two young children.
Many of Kong's supporters also took to Twitter to ask for "prayers" for Kong and the senior church ministry members, with one user "Erictan" saying that he was "praying and fasting" for Kong's "protection".
Both Alicia Goh and Eric Tan need to grow a backbone.
"I still believe he will come out spotless from all this -- he's a man of God and we believe in him," said teacher Alicia Goh, 29, who attends the church regularly with her husband and two young children.
Many of Kong's supporters also took to Twitter to ask for "prayers" for Kong and the senior church ministry members, with one user "Erictan" saying that he was "praying and fasting" for Kong's "protection".
Both Alicia Goh and Eric Tan need to grow a backbone.
M
Mdm Tang
Guest
Subhas Anandan will be there 2mrw at the Sub Court ...
Pii Chon don't listen to these sinkies stay in LOS market much much bigger. Huat Ah!
I always suspected that money was being channeled towards kong hee's horse, No Music house/label would invest in her.
I think this lao-chee-bye, Joyce Leong from Joy Riders cycling club must have learned from Kelong Kong how to fleece their members.
For those interested to know how Kong Hee "am-kang"
http://www.charities.gov.sg/charity/charity/charityCMSFileDownload.do?id=180
Misrepresentation on the Use of the Charity’s Funds
1 In 2002, the Charity’s founders, Kong Hee and Ho Yeow Sun (“Sun Ho”),
embarked on a “Crossover Project” [“the Project”], with the purported intention to use
Sun Ho’s secular music to connect with people and reach out to non-Christians.
2 In 2003, an individual alleged in the media that the Charity was funding Sun
Ho’s music career. This attracted public attention. This individual eventually issued
a public apology and retracted his allegations. During that period, the Charity had
faced media scrutiny over the allegations. Subsequently, the Charity issued press
statements and made several representations to its members to state that they had
not funded Sun Ho’s music career.
3 Despite the representations made by the Charity and unknown to the
Executive Members, the Charity’s funds were used to fund the Project. Over a
period of 3 years (2007 to 2010), at least $23 million was used. However, during this
period of time, the Executive members were not told of the actual purpose of the use
of these funds.
(B) Use of the Charity’s Funds to Fund the Project
4 Between December 2007 and May 2010, the Charity’s funds were used to
finance the Project under the guise of donations to its affiliated church in Kuala
Lumpur, known as the City Harvest Church Kuala Lumpur [“CHCKL”]. The funds
were then transmitted by CHCKL to support the Project in the United States. During
this period, at least $2.1 million was transferred from the Charity to CHCKL to fund
the Project. The Inquiry revealed that Kong Hee, Tan Ye Peng, Kelvin Teo Meng
How, Tan Shao Yuen Sharon and Serina Wee Gek Yin were aware of the true
purpose of the donations to CHCKL.
5 In addition, donations and tithes to the Charity were transferred into a
private fund known as the Multi-Purpose Account [“MPA”], administered by Serina
Wee Gek Yin (the Charity’s ex-Finance Manager and Executive member) and Tan
Su Pheng Jacqueline (former Personal Assistant to Kong Hee, current contract staff
and Executive member of the Charity). Monies in this account were used to fund the
Project. For the period April 2007 to March 2010, the funds were used for purported
expenditures of Kong Hee and Sun Ho, amounting to approximately $600,000 and
$3 million respectively. Selected donors were asked to transfer their contributions
originally meant for the Charity’s “Arise and Build” campaign to the MPA. Some
members ceased or reduced their regular tithes to the Charity after they contributed
funds to the MPA. Apart from this small group of members, the existence of the
MPA was not made known to the Charity’s members. There was even an attempt to
conceal the existence of this Account by closing the joint bank account and dealing
only in cash transactions, which was kept in a safe at the Charity.
6 In or around April 2009, a plan was conceptualised by Tan Ye Peng, Chew
Eng Han, Serina Wee Gek Yin and Tan Shao Yuen Sharon to transfer monies
amounting to $600,000 donated by Wahju Hanafi to the Charity’s Building Fund via a
“refund” of Building Fund donations into the MPA to meet some funding needs of the
Project, which included US$100,000 to finance a media team from Singapore to
publicise and write about Sun Ho’s music career in the United States. Inquiry
revealed that the Charity had drafted letters from Wahju Hanafi and one other person
indicating that their donations to the Charity were intended for specific Pastors and
employees of the Charity as love gifts. It was then arranged for these said Pastors
and employees to receive the “refund” as love gifts and immediately thereafter to
deposit these love gifts into the MPA. The Inquiry further revealed evidence which
strongly suggests that the “refund” letters were backdated, i.e. the letters were dated
close to or on the date of the donations and one of the letters was dated before the
date of the donations.
(C) Schemes to Avoid Disclosure on Related Party Transactions
7 Between 2006 and 2008, Kong Hee’s company sold over $3 million worth
of merchandise to the Charity. The Inquiry also revealed that Kong Hee did not
disclose his interests in these related party transactions in the Charity’s financial
statements. In 2008, Kong Hee “refunded” royalties to the Charity amounting to
approximately $770,000 from the sale of his merchandise to the Charity from 2006 to
2008. The return of these royalties was ostensibly motivated by concerns that the
Charity’s auditors would require Kong Hee’s royalties to be disclosed as related party
transactions. The amount “refunded” by Kong Hee was concealed as “sales
discount” given to the Charity. Subsequently, the purported refunds were
reimbursed to Kong Hee from the MPA and from CHCKL. Kong Hee’s “refund” of
royalties to the Charity was therefore cosmetic and he was instead never “out of
pocket”. The Inquiry revealed that the individuals who were aware of the above
avoidance in disclosure were Kong Hee, Tan Ye Peng, Kelvin Teo Meng How, Tan
Shao Yuen Sharon, Serina Wee Gek Yin and Tan Su Pheng Jacqueline.
(D) Governance and Control Issues
8 Evidence suggested that certain members of the Charity’s Board have
been less than prudent in the discharge of their duties toward the Charity and its
members. For example, the appointment of Investment Manager, Chew Eng Han’s
investment company, was not properly tabled and discussed by the Charity’s Board.
9 The Inquiry further revealed that when Chew Eng Han suffered financial
difficulties, the Charity refunded donations amounting to about $338,000 to him in
two separate tranches, i.e. $240,000 and $98,000. However, in respect of the
$98,000, the Charity’s Board only gave approval for the refund of donations to Chew
Eng Han 9 months after the refunds were made.
10 The poor corporate governance in the Charity contributed, at least in part,
to the fact that the Charity was able to maintain the above-mentioned activities for
the past 3 years.
http://www.charities.gov.sg/charity/charity/charityCMSFileDownload.do?id=180
Misrepresentation on the Use of the Charity’s Funds
1 In 2002, the Charity’s founders, Kong Hee and Ho Yeow Sun (“Sun Ho”),
embarked on a “Crossover Project” [“the Project”], with the purported intention to use
Sun Ho’s secular music to connect with people and reach out to non-Christians.
2 In 2003, an individual alleged in the media that the Charity was funding Sun
Ho’s music career. This attracted public attention. This individual eventually issued
a public apology and retracted his allegations. During that period, the Charity had
faced media scrutiny over the allegations. Subsequently, the Charity issued press
statements and made several representations to its members to state that they had
not funded Sun Ho’s music career.
3 Despite the representations made by the Charity and unknown to the
Executive Members, the Charity’s funds were used to fund the Project. Over a
period of 3 years (2007 to 2010), at least $23 million was used. However, during this
period of time, the Executive members were not told of the actual purpose of the use
of these funds.
(B) Use of the Charity’s Funds to Fund the Project
4 Between December 2007 and May 2010, the Charity’s funds were used to
finance the Project under the guise of donations to its affiliated church in Kuala
Lumpur, known as the City Harvest Church Kuala Lumpur [“CHCKL”]. The funds
were then transmitted by CHCKL to support the Project in the United States. During
this period, at least $2.1 million was transferred from the Charity to CHCKL to fund
the Project. The Inquiry revealed that Kong Hee, Tan Ye Peng, Kelvin Teo Meng
How, Tan Shao Yuen Sharon and Serina Wee Gek Yin were aware of the true
purpose of the donations to CHCKL.
5 In addition, donations and tithes to the Charity were transferred into a
private fund known as the Multi-Purpose Account [“MPA”], administered by Serina
Wee Gek Yin (the Charity’s ex-Finance Manager and Executive member) and Tan
Su Pheng Jacqueline (former Personal Assistant to Kong Hee, current contract staff
and Executive member of the Charity). Monies in this account were used to fund the
Project. For the period April 2007 to March 2010, the funds were used for purported
expenditures of Kong Hee and Sun Ho, amounting to approximately $600,000 and
$3 million respectively. Selected donors were asked to transfer their contributions
originally meant for the Charity’s “Arise and Build” campaign to the MPA. Some
members ceased or reduced their regular tithes to the Charity after they contributed
funds to the MPA. Apart from this small group of members, the existence of the
MPA was not made known to the Charity’s members. There was even an attempt to
conceal the existence of this Account by closing the joint bank account and dealing
only in cash transactions, which was kept in a safe at the Charity.
6 In or around April 2009, a plan was conceptualised by Tan Ye Peng, Chew
Eng Han, Serina Wee Gek Yin and Tan Shao Yuen Sharon to transfer monies
amounting to $600,000 donated by Wahju Hanafi to the Charity’s Building Fund via a
“refund” of Building Fund donations into the MPA to meet some funding needs of the
Project, which included US$100,000 to finance a media team from Singapore to
publicise and write about Sun Ho’s music career in the United States. Inquiry
revealed that the Charity had drafted letters from Wahju Hanafi and one other person
indicating that their donations to the Charity were intended for specific Pastors and
employees of the Charity as love gifts. It was then arranged for these said Pastors
and employees to receive the “refund” as love gifts and immediately thereafter to
deposit these love gifts into the MPA. The Inquiry further revealed evidence which
strongly suggests that the “refund” letters were backdated, i.e. the letters were dated
close to or on the date of the donations and one of the letters was dated before the
date of the donations.
(C) Schemes to Avoid Disclosure on Related Party Transactions
7 Between 2006 and 2008, Kong Hee’s company sold over $3 million worth
of merchandise to the Charity. The Inquiry also revealed that Kong Hee did not
disclose his interests in these related party transactions in the Charity’s financial
statements. In 2008, Kong Hee “refunded” royalties to the Charity amounting to
approximately $770,000 from the sale of his merchandise to the Charity from 2006 to
2008. The return of these royalties was ostensibly motivated by concerns that the
Charity’s auditors would require Kong Hee’s royalties to be disclosed as related party
transactions. The amount “refunded” by Kong Hee was concealed as “sales
discount” given to the Charity. Subsequently, the purported refunds were
reimbursed to Kong Hee from the MPA and from CHCKL. Kong Hee’s “refund” of
royalties to the Charity was therefore cosmetic and he was instead never “out of
pocket”. The Inquiry revealed that the individuals who were aware of the above
avoidance in disclosure were Kong Hee, Tan Ye Peng, Kelvin Teo Meng How, Tan
Shao Yuen Sharon, Serina Wee Gek Yin and Tan Su Pheng Jacqueline.
(D) Governance and Control Issues
8 Evidence suggested that certain members of the Charity’s Board have
been less than prudent in the discharge of their duties toward the Charity and its
members. For example, the appointment of Investment Manager, Chew Eng Han’s
investment company, was not properly tabled and discussed by the Charity’s Board.
9 The Inquiry further revealed that when Chew Eng Han suffered financial
difficulties, the Charity refunded donations amounting to about $338,000 to him in
two separate tranches, i.e. $240,000 and $98,000. However, in respect of the
$98,000, the Charity’s Board only gave approval for the refund of donations to Chew
Eng Han 9 months after the refunds were made.
10 The poor corporate governance in the Charity contributed, at least in part,
to the fact that the Charity was able to maintain the above-mentioned activities for
the past 3 years.
Last edited:
Satan must be behind this, and blinded the people to persecute Mr KongJust like Jesus who was dragged thru the streets and cruxified.:(
Mr Kong has been so successful in spreading the word of god and bring many many faithfuls to gates of heaven, Satan is scared of losing power and therefore works his black magic to bring down one of god's great generals.
I will never believe Mr Kong is gulity
Hallelujah!!!!! Xtians must hold firm and withstand god's many trials to test our faith in him. Hallelujah!!!!!
Standfast children of god for you are his army and fist against the evil Satan.
You mean this one?
We Stand for God
We stand for God and for His glory
The Lord Supreme and God of all.
Against his foes, we raise His standard,
Around His cross, we hear His call.
Strengthen our faith, Redeemer,
Guard us when danger is neigh
To Thee we pledge our lives and service,
Strong in a trust that ne'er shall die.
To Thee we pledge our lives and service
Strong in a trust that ne'er shall die.`
or this one?
As we gather may Your Spirit work within us
As we gather may we glorify Your Name
Knowing well that as our hearts begin to worship
We'll be blessed because we came X2 (Repeat I)
According to reports, when asked for her response to her husband's arrest, Sun Horse pulled a long face.
Boob job spotted. Part of the $24M went into there.
After spending 23m and still not a star? Horseface must really have been shit.
Similar threads
