• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Complaint to Leongsam -- abuse of infraction power by Alamaking

psy83

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wah what a cheehong ar Ramseth.. Please you obviousy want to score points with "Her", There are so many clones attacking others and trolling members but you turn a blind eye to it..Now you have become very righteous, Up yours la chee hong kia!!!
 

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It was crucial for TFBH to bring in AK's education. It's part of his ad hominem strategy. Just like when i wrote that small comment and he had to blow it totally out of context. Is it important whether AK is or isn't educated? No cos this is just a forum and AK's personal life doesn't affect any single one of us yet he had to do it cos he comes from the same school of thought as screwball in abusing forummers on a personal level.

the out of context was a diversion from the main topic to cause you confusion. a fav screwball trick.

i cite a KVP post
That is just another old and proven PAP trick. It's an effective way of bypassing the responsibility to reason on the same subject matter. If you cannot win on persuasiveness, hit your opponent with something irrelevant and get his ego all worked up. Get your opponent to shift his focus on your irrelevant comment which often has to be personal and malicious in order to be effective. And there you go, you don't have to dwell on the same subject matter where your arguments are thin.

last time when i argued with screw over a certain subject, he would give some ridiculous analogies to prove how stupid i am, i vigorously started to rebuke his analogies, the focus got shifted to those irreverent comments that screw created. back then i never realized why he made those bizarre off topic remarks and went personal toward me. only recently i understand, too late. :o
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
the out of context was a diversion from the main topic to cause you confusion. a fav screwball trick.

i cite a KVP post


last time when i argued with screw over a certain subject, he would give some ridiculous analogies to prove how stupid i am, i vigorously started to rebuke his analogies, the focus got shifted to those irreverent comments that screw created. back then i never realized why he made those bizarre off topic remarks and went personal toward me. only recently i understand, too late. :o


Yet in this case it wasn't screwball that did it but one of his disciples TFBH. In short it goes to show that birds of a feather flock together. It shows why TFBH is such a staunch supporter of screw. He even posts in the same manner.
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
If you shut the fuck up, nobody will say you are dumb or miss you. You cant even count. By an order of ten. LOL!

Hey screwball there's no need to put in your worthless comments. If you want to talk about sucking up how about you sucking up to scroobal like a low down dog. There's nobody in here or even in this world that's a bigger sucker than you. I see you are engaging in ad hominem attacks again bringing in education level and blowing up small mistakes making a big deal out of nothing.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If you shut the fuck up, nobody will say you are dumb or miss you. You cant even count. By an order of ten. LOL!

I must have hit a raw nerve and you are just like screwball. Like i need to shut up but you don't need to? What makes you so special clone?
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
Scroobal however got too personal by dragging in alleged (unconfirmed) details about people's private lives.

Your eyebrows will be raised when you learn that he was put on record to have said "I do not reveal the private details of others" (not exact words). I had asked him in the context that he was making very obvious hints and descriptions about a person that was not me (it goes to show that I DO clarify)

Guess what he said next. "If people choose to write in the same style, not my fault." (not exact words)

Why did I even ask that? Because years ago, he appealed to GMS, CTL and others not to use their real names because that attracted flamebait which in turn risked destroying the forum. Today, he hints to people of identities such that if nemesises were to even speculate those identities, the same thing will happen. Apparently he no longer remembers that this may "bring the forum down" again.

If I suddenly turn to Nick X and said he should not comment on politics because in 1991 he led the biggest party from 3 to 0 seats, who can I be referring to even if I do not mention names.

Tell me if all that above flipfloping is a dealing of a totally honest person.
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
small typo? or small brain?

wow copy my words no wonder you are crowned the king of something so stupid.

maybe I shld have said king of dicks, so I replace the 'u'; or shall i say king of sucks, so i replace the 'd'?? Btw try not to pass off as Scroobal. Yr IQ is no match.

Other than repeating yourself like a broken toy, do you have other linguistic abilities? Don't bother. It is a rhetorical question.
 
Top