• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Plea to Windsor

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Jah has some serious issues going on, He seem to have obtain some very unhealthy false impressions, He constantly thinks that the 25% minority population is picking on the chinese and being racist towards them,(Talk about hypocrisy) He is constantly bashing the Indian population which only stands at a mere 9% or At least 7% locally born and is infact calling the 75% chinese population to band together and unite against the Indians, Take note that you are asking 75% population to go against 9% of the population. luckily for us, this guy is not LHL son cos baton might be pass to him and ethic cleansing might occur. This jah fart is an extremely disgusting fellow who needs people to back him up, I have seen cowards like him hundreds of time in real life, They are pussies when they are alone but will turn into the King of the Jungle when in the presence of friends who he rely on protecting his scrawny ass. Jah is that sort of person..He cant handle issues on his own so he needs backup..He is a pussy fart who wears a women panties outside.


You really need to cook up shit like this loser. I'm fighting against the unfair stereotypes and unfair treatments and unreasonable demands of ppl like you here. Of course you needed to add in the ad hominem attacks if not your arguments would simply fall flat. Talk about needing frens to back you up you're the one that needs it. Look at how you suck up to screwball cos he's apparently on your side but he's just using you. Stalking me like a forum troll day in and day out you cowardly loser. Editing your posts back and forth and not only that making up stories and shit. Then again i suppose this might be the only place where you can feel like a big man, you are unable to ever defeat me at all hence resort to personal attacks.
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
I tot you always advised us to ignore the screw? Why didn't you do it here?

It is you who has the problem with him but not me. I can deal with any problem myself and do not need to create a thread solely just to complain about it.

When I have a problem, I deal with it in a manly and unsinkified way. Btw manly = having balls. Something that a sinkie male will find it hard to comprehend.
 
Last edited:

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I like Sideswipe. He is a history buff, with special interest in Taiwan/ROC history and current affairs, interest in political systems and election statistics, likes football but seldom watches BPL these days, a little tiko pek over Jap chiobus but seems to have grown out of that, hahaha.

This is how the feud between u 2 started. He was discussing about political systems, u corrected him for some mistakes he made, he was not happy and started to argue, u got fed up and started scrooing him.
I asked u not to be too harsh on this young man, u also scrooed me for interfering in a subject I knew little about (which was true). Later Sideswipe admitted that u were probably right, but he was just too stubborn and insistent on his views.

However, the same type of dispute between u2 happened again and he started to become one of your part-time trolls. :o


You shouldn't have to explain anything at all. The mere reason why these nicks are mentioned by screwball is simply cos they are the ones that constantly flame him. Sideswipe flames screwball mercilessly and i can clearly understand why cos screwball is exactly as he describes. What's the purpose of even starting this thread and mentioning these particular nicks? It has nothing to do with the forum rules cos none of us have flaunted the rules so why would any of us get banned or infracted. Screwball should have started the thread stating he has a personal vendetta against all of us instead of coming up with BS like that.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
You shouldn't have to explain anything at all. The mere reason why these nicks are mentioned by screwball is simply cos they are the ones that constantly flame him. Sideswipe flames screwball mercilessly and i can clearly understand why cos screwball is exactly as he describes. What's the purpose of even starting this thread and mentioning these particular nicks? It has nothing to do with the forum rules cos none of us have flaunted the rules so why would any of us get banned or infracted. Screwball should have started the thread stating he has a personal vendetta against all of us instead of coming up with BS like that.

Pls forgive my evil twin Scroobal. I hope that you find in your heart a tinge of sympathy for the man. Scroobal is just a no guts bullshitter who enjoys belittling the folks in the forum. That is an indication of insecurity. His safety blanket.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Could I make a personal plea not to infract or ban the following longstanding Forummers;
Jah Rastafar
Tonychat
Sideswipe

Here are the reasons

These forummers have not breached any of the forum's rules like spamming or issuing infractions to newbies etc but the main and only reason why i brought up their nicks is cos they constantly flame me especially jah and sideswipe and that's of course not tolerated after all i am the forum's brains and life and only i have the moral authority to flame and pass judgment over others. Please take note that i'm actually a coward and don't dare to fight my own personal battles therefore i'm actually bringing up your nick and actually treating you like an idiot by advising you whom or whom not to infract when you should be aware of how to do that and like a low down slimy snake disguising my own personal vendetta against these forummers with inane stupid reasonings. After all you're totally capable of judging for yourself when to give infractions and bans and none of these forummers have actually breached the rules but i just have to state again for the record that it's just personal between me and them but me being the low down snake that i am just doesn't want to admit it hence i need to hide behind you as you know both you and me are pretty chummy and on good terms and of course let's not forget that i used to be this forum's mod and that means something around here.


Yup edited. This is the only reason why this thread here has been started.
 

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Yup edited. This is the only reason why this thread here has been started.

I'm not the target. like what JW5 said, I only do this part time. imo you are the only fish. you clearly annoy Screwball, he talked a lot about you. he can't defeat you. :biggrin:
Tonychat maybe and I were just included to make up the numbers, to make it less obvious it's an agenda against you. Windsor was a pawn for Screw to start the thread.

I'm only guessing here. unlike dickhead Screwball, I can't read peoples' minds and don't make conclusions without any proof.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I'm not the target. like what JW5 said, I only do this part time. imo you are the only fish. you clearly annoy Screwball, he talked a lot about you. he can't defeat you. :biggrin:
Tonychat maybe and I were just included to make up the numbers, to make it less obvious it's an agenda against you. Windsor was a pawn for Screw to start the thread.

I'm only guessing here. unlike dickhead Screwball, I can't read peoples' minds and don't make conclusions without any proof.

Aiyoh that bugger not happy with me then just say it out loud lah. Anyway he doesn't even chat to me at all I didn't know i got him so hurt.


He seems to remember you flaming him even though it's part time. He must have been so hurt since he's so sensitive. :biggrin:
 

Alamaking

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Aiyoh that bugger not happy with me then just say it out loud lah. Anyway he doesn't even chat to me at all I didn't know i got him so hurt.


He seems to remember you flaming him even though it's part time. He must have been so hurt since he's so sensitive. :biggrin:
Kanina, this kind of topic can go to 2 pages.... wtf... is wrong with this forum.....
 

HedgeTrader

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sroobal, I always respect you for your inside infos. But have to agree with Alamaking this is stupid thread. Who to infract or ban is up to those who can infract and ban. Who can infract and ban is up to Leongsam. This much I learn so far in this forum. Suddenly got super lawyer to fight for people. Whats that super lawyer name? Subas Anadas? Or Scroobal LOL
 
Last edited:

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I share your sentiments too but sadly as a Mod has to be impartial and therefore I cannot accede to your request.

pls moderate the courtyard cafe [moderated] and leave this original courtyard cafe alone. don't use your moderator status to justify your reasons to infract any forummers in this section because this section is supposed to be unmoderated.
 

Cruxx

Alfrescian
Loyal
you're still too nice to him. :wink:

I scolded him chao chee bye and lots more. :biggrin::biggrin:

Poor screwball. He thought he could escape from the harsh reality and come online to gain respect. All he got instead were cheebyes and ball-licking dogs. :biggrin:
 

Alamaking

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Can scroobals, sroobal or any other balls please claim that you guys are not my clones? thank you ahh!! :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
 

Khun Ying Pojaman

Alfrescian
Loyal
The mere reason why these nicks are mentioned by screwball is simply cos they are the ones that constantly flame him.

The inclusion of Tonychat in the list was the most important. You and Sideswipe were his targets, but not Tonychat. Didn't you notice that Tonychat was placed right in between the real targets, and was given "more coverage" than the real targets? It's a malicious juxtaposition to discredit and ridicule the real targets via an old slimy method known as "character by association".
 
Top