Your experience with Erawan Four-Faced Buddha ?

[Alamaking]

Drifter vs religious people

Hahaha..

 

[Khun Ying Pojaman]

you dont need to be a qualified scientist to know santa clus is fake ..you dont have to be a scientists to know harry potter is just a story book character .

You're missing the point deliberately to save your skin.

The point is people who are professionally qualified in science don't not use science to discredit the supernatural. In your analogy, the qualified scientist isn't saying Santa Claus is fake; quite the contrary, the great scientist in Sir Isaac Newton believed in the existence of the Supernatural in the course of his pursuit of science.

Of course, it's not Sir Isaac Newton's aim to make you look stupid. It's just that Sir Isaac didn't expect you to plagiarize his knowledge to discredit his faith.

Likewise, Stephen Hawking will not go as far as saying that God does not exist. He merely says that you don't need God to explain the universe.

It's perfectly fine that you're an atheist. But don't quote a source (science) that is contrary to your arguments.

You should stick to making paper lanterns. Science may make you sound high class, but your arguments prove you're better off as a craftsman.

 

[Khun Ying Pojaman]

Another great scientist who seems to disagree with drifter:

It may seem logical, in retrospect, that a combination of awe and rebellion made Einstein exceptional as a scientist. But what is less well known is that those two traits also combined to shape his spiritual journey and determine the nature of his faith. The rebellion part comes in at the beginning of his life: he rejected at first his parents' secularism and later the concepts of religious ritual and of a personal God who intercedes in the daily workings of the world. But the awe part comes in his 50s when he settled into a deism based on what he called the "spirit manifest in the laws of the universe" and a sincere belief in a "God who reveals Himself in the harmony of all that exists."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1607298,00.html#ixzz1X4yQrJbI

The next time before you conveniently borrow the word "science" to discredit the Supernatural, get to know some of the great scientists. They're so knowledgeable, yet so humble. I don't know how well-versed you're in the field of science, but you certainly portray yourself as if you know more than Einstein and Newton in the area of science vs God.

 

[Cruxx]

Newton didn't use the scientific method to validate his beliefs. He didn't observe god. He didn't observe god creating the natural world or dictating its laws of physics. Just because he's a scientist doesn't mean he's scientific about everything in his life. Just because he was right on some things (laws of motion) doesn't mean he's right on everything else (religion). Even Einstein was wrong on some things e.g constant speed of light.

 

[drifter]

Another great scientist who seems to disagree with drifter:

It may seem logical, in retrospect, that a combination of awe and rebellion made Einstein exceptional as a scientist. But what is less well known is that those two traits also combined to shape his spiritual journey and determine the nature of his faith. The rebellion part comes in at the beginning of his life: he rejected at first his parents' secularism and later the concepts of religious ritual and of a personal God who intercedes in the daily workings of the world. But the awe part comes in his 50s when he settled into a deism based on what he called the "spirit manifest in the laws of the universe" and a sincere belief in a "God who reveals Himself in the harmony of all that exists."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1607298,00.html#ixzz1X4yQrJbI

The next time before you conveniently borrow the word "science" to discredit the Supernatural, get to know some of the great scientists. They're so knowledgeable, yet so humble. I don't know how well-versed you're in the field of science, but you certainly portray yourself as if you know more than Einstein and Newton in the area of science vs God.

for your infor ..theres number of scientists also a blind faith followers ...

 

[drifter]

Newton didn't use the scientific method to validate his beliefs. He didn't observe god. He didn't observe god creating the natural world or dictating its laws of physics. Just because he's a scientist doesn't mean he's scientific about everything in his life. Just because he was right on some things (laws of motion) doesn't mean he's right on everything else (religion). Even Einstein was wrong on some things e.g constant speed of light.

you cant talk sense with delusion ppl ....they are brain fuck ...the funny thing is they also love to debunk other religions other then theirs ...

 

[drifter]

You're missing the point deliberately to save your skin.

The point is people who are professionally qualified in science don't not use science to discredit the supernatural. In your analogy, the qualified scientist isn't saying Santa Claus is fake; quite the contrary, the great scientist in Sir Isaac Newton believed in the existence of the Supernatural in the course of his pursuit of science.

Of course, it's not Sir Isaac Newton's aim to make you look stupid. It's just that Sir Isaac didn't expect you to plagiarize his knowledge to discredit his faith.

Likewise, Stephen Hawking will not go as far as saying that God does not exist. He merely says that you don't need God to explain the universe.

It's perfectly fine that you're an atheist. But don't quote a source (science) that is contrary to your arguments.

You should stick to making paper lanterns. Science may make you sound high class, but your arguments prove you're better off as a craftsman.

you should pray to your invisibleman that i dont appear in this thread ..."Stephen Hawking will not go as far as saying that God does not exist. He merely says that you don't need God to explain the universe " . hes just being nice not to insult his friends for being stupid ...read between the lines ...

 

[Cruxx]

you cant talk sense with delusion ppl ....they are brain fuck ...the funny thing is they also love to debunk other religions other then theirs ...

"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F Roberts

 

[krafty]

i may go bangkok to tatoo buddha chantings on my arm, the other day just spoke to daughter of johnny two thumb, and figure out that buddha chanting best suit me.

http://www.johnnytwothumb.com/

incase you dun know who johnny two thumb is, he is a legendary tatooist well known even to places like honolulu 10 to 15 years ago. you ask any senior sailor in hawaii who he is, they will know!

 

[mollusk]

i may go bangkok to tatoo buddha chantings on my arm, the other day just spoke to daughter of johnny two thumb, and figure out that buddha chanting best suit me.

http://www.johnnytwothumb.com/

incase you dun know who johnny two thumb is, he is a legendary tatooist well known even to places like honolulu 10 to 15 years ago. you ask any senior sailor in hawaii who he is, they will know!

why waste money.Its the thought that count..

 

[middaydog]

why waste money.Its the thought that count..

I'd rather count money

 

[po2wq]

why waste money.Its the thought that count..

I'd rather count money

so u rather waste ur tots on counting moni ... :o

 

[Forvendet]

i may go bangkok to tatoo buddha chantings on my arm, the other day just spoke to daughter of johnny two thumb, and figure out that buddha chanting best suit me.

You're real screwed in your mind to tattoo religious chantings. ISD shouldn't be looking for you. IMH should.