- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 2,783
- Points
- 0
I believe Goh's bias has long been an established fact so there's nothing new or something to be surprised about. I would rather be arguing facts. To me, Poh's actions are worse than Yaw's actions where any organisation is concerned. Yaw's actions related to a personal matter that people could not accept out of public figures. Poh's actions were a direct rebellion to the party and given the circumstances, the party would of course take action. Yaw is like a son who refuses to talk to his mother and Poh is like a son who disowns his mother. We don't need a high IQ to tell which is worse. If Poh was sacked as a lecturer by his employer for what he did to WP, then of course it would be weird. But he is rebelling against WP, so WP expels him.
The reason why Yaw faced a punishment as harsh as Poh despite committing a lesser political offence was because Yaw was a sitting MP and should have more accountability and rightfully so. This is why we don't hear about Angela Oon being expelled despite not denying the accusation like Yaw, because she isn't a MP. All these are logical to me.
The reason why Yaw faced a punishment as harsh as Poh despite committing a lesser political offence was because Yaw was a sitting MP and should have more accountability and rightfully so. This is why we don't hear about Angela Oon being expelled despite not denying the accusation like Yaw, because she isn't a MP. All these are logical to me.