-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Vote Tony Tan
- Thread starter Forvendet
- Start date
M
Masamune Date
Guest
The nomination form should also include this clause :
Failure to comply with the above will result in you having no state funeral.
Last edited by a moderator:
That shows your brain is in your ass. Be careful not to shit it out or you wil become brainless. Let's see how many Singaporeans have that kind of trait in this coming president election. Already 60% sinkies loved to be screwed again, not sure about this cuming election.
Last edited:
Hi Forvendet,
Tony Tan is not my idea of a nice man
Tony Tan is not my idea of a nice man
NS is a good concept as it involves defense of the nation. That is, it was a good concept by GKS. Today it is a bad concept as it involves defense of foreign singaporeans who reap the benefits of being a singaporean without any of its liabilities.
So, is TT a current member of the PAP?
Bro, I left you alone more or less after you changed your nick from Kakowi.
You always had poor power of arguing your case or viewpoint and your logic defies every principle in physics including gravity. You have very poor or little in the way of foundation to build a case let alone an argument.
You are a pious christian and ardent PAP follower. Overtime your pattern is clear - if PAP or your church takes a direction, you follow that to a fault. Then you try and justify it by by various arguments which obviously is difficult to stack up and on some occasions it does so by fluke. In technicals terms you are more into reverse engineering.
Not that PAP is stupid or poor at coming to a decision. The way you argue it, even the PAP will cringe. At least read extensively and figure out why they do certain things. It driven by agenda in the main.
Look at the TS. He is in a similar boat - does not have the ability to handle simultaneous equations - unable to handle two thought processes together. He started with TKL now he is with TT and both times unable to explain why. I told him about his power of comprehension before. Isn't it a surprise that you joined in. It not a case of the one eyed in the kingdom of the bllind. Its two blind men.
You always had poor power of arguing your case or viewpoint and your logic defies every principle in physics including gravity. You have very poor or little in the way of foundation to build a case let alone an argument.
You are a pious christian and ardent PAP follower. Overtime your pattern is clear - if PAP or your church takes a direction, you follow that to a fault. Then you try and justify it by by various arguments which obviously is difficult to stack up and on some occasions it does so by fluke. In technicals terms you are more into reverse engineering.
Not that PAP is stupid or poor at coming to a decision. The way you argue it, even the PAP will cringe. At least read extensively and figure out why they do certain things. It driven by agenda in the main.
Look at the TS. He is in a similar boat - does not have the ability to handle simultaneous equations - unable to handle two thought processes together. He started with TKL now he is with TT and both times unable to explain why. I told him about his power of comprehension before. Isn't it a surprise that you joined in. It not a case of the one eyed in the kingdom of the bllind. Its two blind men.
Bro, this thread is a smokescreen lah.
If I was 91% sure yesterday, I'm 92% sure today.....................
There's a word to describe this, it's called "overcompensation".
Of course not, he announced his resignation and disassociation from PAP.
He's quite a nice man whilst I worked with him at OCBC.
He's not the chosen one, just the last man left standing feasible.
As you know, my personal criteria is that the President must be independent of the PAP and preferably independent of the oppositions. Thus if what you said is true, I say that Tony Tan is the best choice for President.
I am also discounting the possibility that it is just a wayang.
Worked with TT at OCBC.
Hmmmmmm..........................
TT left OCBC in 1979, 32 years ago.
Let's say you were 25 when you "worked with him in OCBC", that would make you 57 years old today.
Do try for your first child, it's never too late.
The issue is not the nickname, the content of the posts, who u support or what u like.
The problem is with the deception.
Last edited:
Bro, TT resigned DPM and returned to OCBC in the 1990s. In the 2000s then did he returned to DPM for a second stint. However, it's true that he remained MP all the while, whether in cabinet or as backbencher until GE 2006, when KBW took over his Sembawang seat.
Last edited:
At 57 years then wife is how old? May need young woman if you marry wife about same age
Dunno, this one he never say.
Unlike the "fact" that he's an eurasian businessman, married with no children, lives with MIL whom he loves like a mother, lives in Bishan-TP, goes on holiday with his in-laws, no siblings etc.
Must differentiate from the chinese translator and financial advisor, divorced, lives alone in Jalan Besar, mother lives with his sister, goes on holiday alone or with buddies, favourite destination Thailand.
More info can be obtained from his buddy leetahbar.
Similar threads
