[Video] Palestinians had many chances to have their own state alongside Israel, but they lost their chances because they would rather wipe out Israel

[UltimaOnline]

 

[syed putra]

Based on evidence, very difficult for historians to verify 6 million jews died during holocaust.. But its a number that have been repeated countless times and the west accept it as indisputable facts.

On october 7th hamas revolt, same thing. Babies in ovens, women raped. Repeatedly. But no evidence. The jews quickly buried all victims without autopsy to determine cause of death.

Israel gets away lying through their teeth. If the agreement was fair, do you think palestinians would reject it?

 

[syed putra]

the myth about oslo accord failures

+5



The Oslo Accords (1993/1995) failed not because they were simply a failed peace plan, but because they were designed as a flawed, open-ended interim agreement lacking firm final commitments, allowing for the expansion of Israeli settlements, continued occupation, and a widening power imbalance. Far from leading to statehood, they entrenched the status quo and divided the West Bank into fragmented zones.

Al Jazeera +2
Key Myths and Realities of the Oslo Accords:

• Myth: It was a peace treaty.
  • Reality: It was an interim framework meant for a five-year period to create Palestinian self-governance, not a permanent treaty defining a Palestinian state.
• Myth: The goal was a Two-State Solution.
  • Reality: The terms "two-state solution" or "Palestinian state" were not in the original accords, and critics argue Israel never intended to create a viable, sovereign state.
• Myth: Arafat was the sole cause of failure at Camp David.
  • Reality: While Camp David (2000) was a key failure point, analysts blame inherent flaws, such as the failure of the US to be an honest broker, the continued expansion of settlements (which tripled in some areas post-1993), and the exclusion of key Palestinian voices.
• Myth: It was a temporary step to freedom.
  • Reality: The interim period became permanent. It allowed for the creation of a Palestinian Authority (PA) that often functioned as a subcontractor for Israeli security, leading to corruption and weakness, rather than independence.
• Myth: Both sides were equal partners.
  • Reality: The negotiations occurred between a powerful state and a stateless people under occupation, enabling Israel to dictate terms while increasing settlement construction.
    
    
    Al Jazeera +6

The long-term result was not a sovereign Palestine but a fragmented West Bank, a besieged Gaza, and the dismantling of the potential for a two-state solution

 

[UltimaOnline]