She said the lender is doing its best “to support our clients to tide over short-term challenges, while ensuring that the bank’s prudent credit principles are not compromised”.
She added that UOB “adheres to strict credit standards and principles in full compliance with regulatory requirements”.
In November, UOB was among lenders that reached an 11th-hour agreement to extend the maturity date of a US$110 million (S$141.8 million) loan backed by a life science park in Shanghai. The property is controlled by Gaw Capital Partners, a private equity firm that UOB has financed many deals for.
During the recent deal negotiations, UOB and a few banks were prepared to grant a three-year extension that the borrower requested, but there was pushback from other lenders, according to people familiar with the matter.
In the end, the banks agreed to give the Gaw-managed fund an additional 18 months to repay the loan, whose principal was reduced slightly, with another 18-month extension if certain conditions are met, Bloomberg News reported.
In May, UOB was among lenders that amended and extended a loan backing two Hong Kong office towers called Cityplaza Three and Four that are also owned by a Gaw Capital fund.
UOB more recently led the refinancing of a US$940 million loan for cash-strapped Hong Kong builder Parkview Group following months of negotiations, people familiar with the matter said. The debt is tied to a Beijing shopping mall called Parkview Green, which has not been generating sufficient rental income to cover the loan’s interest payments, Bloomberg News previously reported.
The UOB spokeswoman said the bank cannot comment on individual deals due to client confidentiality. She added that “in general, loans for refinancing are often complex”.
There have been some defaults. In March, a consortium including Schroders Capital and an Asia fund managed by British investment firm Chelsfield failed to repay a HK$1.5 billion loan collateralised by an underground shopping mall called Worfu in Hong Kong’s North Point district when the debt matured.
UOB, which had a majority share of the loan, waited a month before sending a letter to the borrowers demanding repayment, according to people familiar with the matter. The banks appointed receivers for the asset in August.
Within UOB, there have been tensions over the outlook for the regions’ properties. Some credit officers have wanted business teams to examine struggling borrowers’ real cash flow and push for solutions, according to people familiar with the matter. Other staff have preferred to work out loan extensions in the hope that the market will recover, the people said.
Family ties
Singapore’s billionaire Wee family, who controls UOB, built much of their early fortune in property. They have long regarded real estate as a safe and reliable asset class, according to people familiar with the matter.
After China’s property downturn took hold, UOB chief executive officer Wee Ee Cheong said on a 2022 earnings call that the bank’s exposure to Chinese developers was manageable and not something he was overly concerned about. That year, UOB took over a loan to troubled Shanghai-based developer Shimao Group from other banks.
By 2024, UOB’s leadership spoke about challenges, accelerating provisions “on a few chunky accounts” they had previously hoped to restructure.
In September 2025, UOB extended the maturity of a HK$10 billion loan financing a Hong Kong luxury residential development called Beacon Peak that Shimao developed. It had earlier sought to offload the debt to private credit investors, Bloomberg News reported.
UOB’s expected losses from income-producing real estate loan exposures are the highest among Singapore’s big three banks, said Ms Rena Kwok, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst. She added that the provisions taken in the recent third quarter will help “to cushion potential credit losses, given pockets of stress in its book”.