The nonsensical reply of Tharman to Roy's questions on CPF

[Confuseous]

I have to keep this long passage here before it gets amended or deleted. There are a few contradictory and nonsensical points here in Tharman's reply and I expect political parties to point them out in this important National debate over CPF issue.

Tharman has basically contradicted himself a couple of times in this reply as well as obfuscated the primary issue of how our CPF money is managed and who is supposed to be responsible for our CPF money.

He is basically saying, we have your money, put it somewhere call GIC but everybody should pretend it doesn't exist there!

I shall touched on his nonsensical remarks made above but for the mean time, you can try to spot his follies before I write about it in my next article.

Goh Meng Seng

http://singaporealternatives.blogspot.sg/2014/07/nonsensical-reply-from-tharman-i.html

 

[escher]

Nothing new.
As if you all do not know.

Those MIWs lie and lie, and lie again, and again.

About the only thing they know how to do.
Is to tell lies after lies after lies
while stealing our money hand over fist and laughing all the way to their banks



Hang those PAP maggots cockroaches with piano wires from lamp posts to make them dance before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.
BBQ those PAP maggots cockroaches before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.
Cut a few more arseholes into those PAP maggots cockroaches to let out their shit before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.
Make those PAP maggots cockroaches eat joss sticks and candle wax before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.

 

[dr.wailing]

Please tell Goh Meng Seng that come election day, the electorate is concerned with only whether they can withdraw the whole of their CPF at age 55 or 65, how much interest their CPF deposit is earning, whether their CPF sums can catch up with the inflation rate and cost of living.

If the opposition is able to frame their manifesto in the above manner will the electorate understand the important issues.

We aren't concerned with which minstar says what, which part of their speech contradicts which part and whether the GIC or Temasick is playing with our CPF money.

 

[winnipegjets]

All the blah, blah from millionaire Tharman avoids answering the question: Why should sinkees give up 5X more in returns for a below infaltion 2 percent PAP-government guarantee return?

Who in his sane mind would like to give $850k to the government?

PAP government guarantee is no better than the strength of the US equity market. If the US equity market collapses, the whole world goes down with it, sinkapore included.

Put $10k annually in the CPF for 30 years, you get $450k.
Put same amount in S&P ETF, you get $1.3 million.
That's a WHOPPING $850,000 difference!

The PAP government has ripped you off big time under the CPF scheme. It's a retirement saving scheme that makes you poorer instead of richer.

 

[Leckmichamarsch]

I have to keep this long passage here before it gets amended or deleted. There are a few contradictory and nonsensical points here in Tharman's reply and I expect political parties to point them out in this important National debate over CPF issue.

Tharman has basically contradicted himself a couple of times in this reply as well as obfuscated the primary issue of how our CPF money is managed and who is supposed to be responsible for our CPF money.

He is basically saying, we have your money, put it somewhere call GIC but everybody should pretend it doesn't exist there!

I shall touched on his nonsensical remarks made above but for the mean time, you can try to spot his follies before I write about it in my next article.

Goh Meng Seng

http://singaporealternatives.blogspot.sg/2014/07/nonsensical-reply-from-tharman-i.html

He was paid n instructed to lie////////////////////////