• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Temasek, take note...beaming electricity wirelessly

ChanRasjid

Alfrescian
Loyal
"...beaming electricity wirelessly"
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/bus...ctricity-wirelessly-raises-30-million-3118361

Quick Temasek! Quick! Be the first to catch a great opportunity. Don't let Softbank get ahead!

A breakthrough technology to transmit electricity without copper cables. Look at the inventor - young, intelligent, handsome and caucasian from silicon valley. Don't need to do 8 month's due diligence or you'll miss out.

Einstein had no understanding of the rudimentary concepts of mechanics and yet he tried to develop a "new relativistic mechanics" as a replacement to Newtonian mechanics...

"A Gift of God and Isaac Newton"
http://www.emc2fails.com/html/godsgift/godsgift-v2.html

quote:...Einstein (at age 26) in his 1905 paper proposed his special theory of relativity based on his light postulate:
"The speed of light is a universal constant(invariant) independent of the motion of the observer":
But just because Einstein used the term ‘speed’ does not mean it has anything to do with speed as a concept in Newtonian mechanics. We may call an elephant a swan and this new ‘swan’ will still never ever fly. The concept of speed in Newtonian mechanics is not dependent on the type of motion or the thing of which motion we measure the speed. So the speed of light in Newtonian mechanics, as a defined concept, must always be relative or dependent on the motion of the observer - speed is always non-invariant.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid,
"Einstein's E=mc2 Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
As long as the Temasek Familee reptilians are around, such technology, assuming it exists, will never be made public. :cool:
 

ChanRasjid

Alfrescian
Loyal
Using electromagnetic waves to transmit high energy beam is not a new tech.
All electromagnetic waves - radio, microwave, lasers, etc - are just energy in the form of waves in the aether of empty space, but the power transmitted through em waves are usually ok to carry signals only; not to transfer power to end users as with our electric power grids. The grids need conductor cables.

I think it is highly unlikely that we can develop the technology to transmit power wirelessly to replace conductor cables. The publicizing of the startup getting $30 million is another scam out to get dumb investors like Temasek, nothing else!

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid,
"Einstein's E=mc2 Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Einstein had no understanding of the rudimentary concepts of mechanics and yet he tried to develop a "new relativistic mechanics" as a replacement to Newtonian mechanics...

"A Gift of God and Isaac Newton"
http://www.emc2fails.com/html/godsgift/godsgift-v2.html

quote:...Einstein (at age 26) in his 1905 paper proposed his special theory of relativity based on his light postulate:
"The speed of light is a universal constant(invariant) independent of the motion of the observer":
But just because Einstein used the term ‘speed’ does not mean it has anything to do with speed as a concept in Newtonian mechanics. We may call an elephant a swan and this new ‘swan’ will still never ever fly. The concept of speed in Newtonian mechanics is not dependent on the type of motion or the thing of which motion we measure the speed. So the speed of light in Newtonian mechanics, as a defined concept, must always be relative or dependent on the motion of the observer - speed is always non-invariant.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid,
"Einstein's E=mc2 Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com


from what i gather physics is all about models. models as in theoretical models not models made of clay or parading around in some fashion show or some nonsense.

apparently economists and others in financial/linked sectors borrowed the idea with no regard to applicability or validity. result is the use of immense number of absurd models used to model real life situations that bear little to no resemblance to these models.

an analogy might be, when the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, to you.


moreover, another problem is the lack of (mathematical and logical) rigour. there are running jokes, widely recognized jokes about the lack of mathematical logical rigour as used by physicists, and therefore, as used by other fields that are dependent on theories and experimental results obtained from physics such as various engineering disciplines, chemistry, life sciences, interdisciplinary areas like nanotech/materials science etc.


worse yet are apparently unrelated disciplines of social sciences or financial/economic/actuarial sciences (loosely used term) that are even less rigorous in their approach and lift any model out of anywhere they find for no apparently good reason.


i couldn't find any economist who could explain how production of some tangible discrete items like say rice, or soft drinks, or memory chips, or display, could vary continuously and could be modeled using any of the numerous commonly used mathematical functions they use in their modeling.

likewise many of the nonsensical jibber jabber about space-time, 4 dimensions, 11 dimensions and what not have little to do with any "real life" or "valid" or "actual" observation or such but more about theoretical or "paper" calculations, if you like, for those who used highly questionable/non rigorous mathematically unsound illogical "models" to portray reality, nature or physical universe or whatever else you might call it.


to an amateur or novice or young teenager this might all sound too intriguing and how reality is far more complex that their imaginations or everyday experiences, but to someone well versed in some of these techniques, the methods applied and used willy nilly with the least care for rigour applicability or logical or mathematical soundness might make for a laugh or two.


i think mongoloid (i.e. chinese japanese korean vietnamese stinky hongkie taiwanese jiuhu chink etc) brains are less developed.

they told me in a matter of fact manner, that they are more pragmatic, more results oriented, they seek immediate returns. they can't comprehend these "cheem" concepts, too dumb to do so, their brains are not sophisticated enough to interpret difficult concepts, more "abstract" concepts if you like.

there is a good reason that mongoloids have always been copycats, failures, cheap labour countries with no original invention or ideas.

caucasoids are better suited to inventive original new ideas and the geniuses and talented God gifted ones among the caucasoids better able to come up with original ideas that are trend setters that change the course of history, you might argue.


since yanks are a nation of cowboys huddled masses refugees blathering idiots bumpkins and such, they aren't the most sophisticated of caucasoids. they aren't expected to be that either. their heritage tells us how sophisticated they can possibly be. they rely on natural resources like population stolen red indian land and natural resources to do simple, obvious, straightforward things. there's also no sense of morality, right or wrong, any "bottom line" that they'd never cross, no hesitation in lying cheating deceiving spreading senseless nonstop propaganda and what not.

btw caucasoids aren't restricted to only ang moh kias. there are other communities, plenty of them, who are caucasoids but they don't need to be ang moh kia.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
All electromagnetic waves - radio, microwave, lasers, etc - are just energy in the form of waves in the aether of empty space, but the power transmitted through em waves are usually ok to carry signals only; not to transfer power to end users as with our electric power grids. The grids need conductor cables.

I think it is highly unlikely that we can develop the technology to transmit power wirelessly to replace conductor cables. The publicizing of the startup getting $30 million is another scam out to get dumb investors like Temasek, nothing else!

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid,
"Einstein's E=mc2 Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com
if tesla was unsuccessful i doubt anyone would be. waste of money. it’s like someone in canada who proposed heating a house by turning it into a microwave oven. lol!
 

cocobobo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Not sure how useful this will be when you transmit through the air but any useful power will fry everything in the air. So you need to build tunnels which can stand high heat or you melt the soil. Which you probably don't have to if you lay cables.
 
Top