[Straits Times] - Medical Doctor warns Singaporeans (like SBFuncle) from suka suka suing Doctors or they may regret it

[sbfuncle]

@sbfuncle

Research study concludes that AI not only beat doctors at diagnosing complex medical conditions in patients by themselves, but importantly. AI even beat doctors who used AI in reaching their diagnosis, why? Because when these doctors disagreed with the AI's diagnosis, they chose to trust themselves over the AI's diagnosis, and in almost all cases it turned out the AI was right and the doctors were wrong.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/health/chatgpt-ai-doctors-diagnosis.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-ai-diagnosed-accurate-doctors-medicine-study-2025-7#:~:text=45 PM PT-,Microsoft said its medical AI diagnosed cases four times as,about its place in medicine.

Will AI replace doctors?​

Microsoft said in the blog post that AI "represents a complement to doctors and other health professionals."

Microsoft didn't dared to say that AI can complement the patient to beat loctors to puppies.
Or else the medical industry will be in a mess with more people beating loctors to puppies.

 

[True Believer]

Research study concludes that AI not only beat doctors at diagnosing complex medical conditions in patients by themselves, but importantly. AI even beat doctors who used AI in reaching their diagnosis, why? Because when these doctors disagreed with the AI's diagnosis, they chose to trust themselves over the AI's diagnosis, and in almost all cases it turned out the AI was right and the doctors were wrong.

Good doctors point to their years of training and experience which help them make decisions based on intuition, sound reasoning and moral judgment. AI aims not to replace conscious human reasoning, but to enable clinicians to arrive at better decisions.

 

[True Believer]

Microsoft didn't dared to say that AI can complement the patient to beat loctors to puppies. Or else the medical industry will be in a mess with more people beating loctors to puppies.

More and more docs acknowledge that computers give them access to a web-based repository of medical information and insights. They recognise that embracing AI in medicine does not mean relinquishing their responsibility as medical practitioners.

 

[UltimaOnline]

Microsoft didn't dared to say that AI can complement the patient to beat loctors to puppies.
Or else the medical industry will be in a mess with more people beating loctors to puppies.

More and more docs acknowledge that computers give them access to a web-based repository of medical information and insights. They recognise that embracing AI in medicine does not mean relinquishing their responsibility as medical practitioners.

Note : the part about why AI even beat doctors who tried to use AI (ie. because they chose to trust themselves over the AI, perhaps out of ego) may not be fully covered in the articles above, but was included in a Straits Times article a month back, but I can't find it on the internet now. Anyone knows where please share the link in this thread, thanks.