• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Should I start stockpiling Eggs, Rice and Toilet Paper etc etc this weekend?

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
1620975562774.png
 

waitifcuk

Alfrescian
Loyal
don’t listen to rumors, listen to Straits Times, got editorial integrity one- they report the whole truth and nothing else but the truth, somemore very objective one...

K L N

He should stock up on a few gallons of LauKwayBu tonic soup.
The end of the world is cummings.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
The situation seems to be getting worse every passing day. There are so many unlinked cases now. Will there be a lockdown soon?

I better start stockpiling s9me supplies this weekend.

Do you think I am overreacting? Or should I trust the PAP Ministers?
Lol while u are ‘thinking’, people already panic buy and bought everything liao!

60517329-AD00-40AA-B099-A4E27AD93268.jpeg
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Simply stock up on MREs and you'll not have to be so kan cheong. I have cartons of them in my doomsday bunker aka my HDB storeroom. So I am good!

XMRE-1300xt-banner.jpg
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
C B or C C B ... we are all dead meat
how long can we cuntinue to be locked down like prisoners
not our fault
yet we have to suffer in such a manner
what the hell is going on ?????????? knnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
go and raid the supermarkets
store as much as you want
you eat what is your share
after that join the corpes in the ganges
you cannot eat more than your karma has determined
stock also no use
cry also no use
panic also no use
time to go ...just go...join the corpes in the ganges
 

capamerica

Alfrescian
Loyal
The PAP can issue as many lockdown announcements as they want but it is not going to make a scrap of difference to the eventual outcome.

Covid will continue to spread once the lockdown is lifted just as it has in every single country that has over reacted to what is a relatively minor virus.

Wrong. Again. Lets see that makes it 0 for 217 tries. All fail.

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/yes-lockdowns-do-help-slow-the-spread-of-covid-19

Yes, Lockdowns Do Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19​


Male_Closed_Shop_1296x728-header-1296x729.jpg
Share on PinterestWhile they may not be 100 percent effective, lockdowns have helped us in the fight against COVID-19. brightstars/Getty Images
  • Countries around the world turned to lockdowns to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
  • While lockdowns may not be 100 percent effective, studies show that they do help greatly reduce the transmission of the coronavirus.
  • However, studies also show that those who are able to participate in lockdowns benefit more from them than those who have to work in high-risk environments.
While countries around the world turn to lockdowns to help stop the spread of COVID-19, some people question the method’s effectiveness and even forgo the facts to spread misinformation.
For instance, a New York Post article misrepresented data from a UCSF study, in which the senior author of the paper Dr. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, professor and chair of the department of epidemiology and biostatistics at UCSF, stated, “The early shutdown worked for California. Mortality rates that were rising early in the pandemic dropped substantially in a timeframe that coincides with the shutdown. But, importantly, not all Californians seemed to benefit.”
Bibbins-Domingo goes on to discuss that nearly 20,000 more Californians died in the first 6 months of the pandemic than would have been expected to die in a typical year, with a disproportionate number of those deaths occurring among older adults, Black or Latino residents, or those who had not completed high school.
The study shows that those who are able to participate in lockdowns benefit more from them than those who have to work in high-risk environments.
However, the New York Post article misinterprets this information to mean lockdowns do not work.
They do.
Dr. Bruce E. Hirsch, attending physician and assistant professor in the infectious disease division of Northwell Health in New York, says while lockdowns will never be 100 percent effective in eliminating the risk of exposure to COVID-19 because people have to grocery shop and care for people in need, that doesn’t mean they are pointless.
“The critics can point out the limitations to lockdowns and say, ‘See the lockdown isn’t perfect and the vaccine isn’t 100 percent effective.’ While they are correct, they are missing what’s important, which is that public health measures all reinforce each other and help reduce the risk of exposure to COVID-19 by a lot,” Hirsch told Healthline.

Lockdowns buy scientists time​

Lockdowns have been used for centuries as a way to slow the spread of disease, all the way back to the 14th centuryTrusted Source, as a response to the Black Death plague that spread across Europe.
Dr. Scott Braunstein, medical director of Sollis Health in Los Angeles, explains that lockdowns are a temporary measure that are used to slow the spread of disease and help buy time for scientists to track the spread, learn more about the disease, and develop treatments.
“Lockdowns become imperative when our medical system is at risk of becoming overwhelmed, to prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality, as a result of lack of medical resources,” Braunstein told Healthline.
During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, this was the goal of lockdowns, which was referred to as “flattening the curve.”
“Lockdowns at that time were successful in preventing millions more cases of COVID-19, and saving thousands of lives,” said Braunstein.



HEALTHLINE RESOURCE
TRANSFORM: Health Equity
We believe in health equity—the equal opportunity for everyone to live their healthiest life. Join us in transforming health outcomes through the power of storytelling.
GO NOW

The virus thrives on proximity​

More than 552,000 people in the United States have died from COVID-19, and about 1,000 people per day continue to lose their lives from the disease caused by the coronavirus.
“We owe it to ourselves to be as aggressive as we can to contain this virus,” said Hirsch.
Because the coronavirus spreads both by droplets and aerosol, you can contract it when you breathe air into your respiratory passages that has the virus in it.
“We know that the ways to prevent SARS-CoV-2 from being transmitted from one person to the other is to not get exposed. The idea of avoiding the virus in the environment includes distance, and it’s not just 3 feet or 6 feet. We know aerosol travels much further, so social distance as a strategy is helpful, but so are other measures, such as wearing masks and ventilation,” Hirsch said.
The longer amount of time you’re in an environment where the virus is, increases your chances of being exposed.
“So if you have a mask on that is 50 percent effective and are in an environment for 15 minutes, your chances of exposure [greatly] increases if you are in that same environment for an hour,” Hirsch added.

ADVERTISING


Why lockdowns work in some areas and not others​

Braunstein said that lockdowns were initially effective in slowing the spread of COVID-19 in many parts of the United States when the general public was in support of them and abided by them.
“However, the U.S. did not take advantage of this window to develop widespread and aggressive testing and contact tracing protocols that could have had more long-term benefit,” he said.
Braunstein also pointed out that this is in contrast to countries like Israel and Australia where there have been under 1,000 deaths from COVID-19 so far.
Those countries also continue to use targeted lockdowns to suppress local spikes of cases. They have robust systems of testing and tracing, and more widespread buy-in from their citizens too.
He added that the virus mutated quickly from its first outbreak in Wuhan, China, to the time it got to Europe.
Hirsch explained that if a virus has adapted to be more transmissible, then measures that might have been adequate for an earlier outbreak are no longer adequate.
“A lot of the people in the public health field are remarking on the fact that we are seeing more and more [of the U.K. strain] in the U.S., and the mitigation methods — wearing masks, social distancing — will have to be made more rigorous, if we’re going to have a chance of being able to contain a virus that is better adapted to be transmitted from person to person,” he said.
In addition, Braunstein added, that many other countries enacted national policies in terms of COVID-19 response, while the United States mainly left the decision to the discretion of each state.
In fact, some critics of lockdowns will compare cities or states in the United States where there were stricter quarantine measures to those that were more relaxed, and use this as evidence that the stricter measures were ineffective, Braunstein pointed out.
“There are many factors that are at play, and it is difficult to know what would have been the outcome in stricter states, had they not enacted those measures,” he said.
For instance, he said that in a state like California, where they have among the lowest number of hospital and ICU beds per capita, they were able to avoid completely overwhelming the medical system.
“Those of us on the front lines know exactly how close we were to the system failing, which would have led to a devastating outcome of thousands of unnecessary deaths,” he said.
Lack of national policy and politicization of the COVID-19 response are the main reasons lockdowns varied from state to state, according to Braunstein.
“Economic pressures led many governors to relax restrictions earlier than was advisable. People in certain parts of the country felt that acts such as wearing masks and social distancing were a symbol of political party, and willfully disregarded any precautions as a way to show loyalty to a party or leader,” he said.


Yes, there’s still room for improvement of lockdowns​

While Hirsch and Braunstein believe lockdowns help curtail the spread of COVID-19, they both note that lockdowns also result in negative financial, psychological, and other health-related ramifications.
Braunstein hopes that going forward, the United States follows the lead of countries like Australia that use targeted, limited lockdowns (as short as 3 days), in areas where spikes occur, in order to prevent widespread disease.
Hirsch hopes society finds more creative and better ways to live with the virus that don’t require isolation.
“I’d be interested to see application of techniques that healthcare workers use in the hospitals more widespread throughout society, so we can be safe and interact with each other and be active and have our children and those coping with mental stress be supported during this time,” he said.
 

capamerica

Alfrescian
Loyal
The spread can be minimised during a lockdown but sooner or later the lockdown has to end and the infection will then ramp upwards again.

It's like a siege where the fugitive has barricaded himself behind locked doors. However sooner or later he has to emerge or he'll starve to death.

Same goes with lockdowns. The virus has all the time in the world to wait things out and start infecting once society emerges.

Another stupid, worthless opinion that has no merit

Your ranking might fall further. 318,000 is terrible.
 
Top