Britain: The Home Office Hides the Real Costs of "muslim" asylum

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
14,959
Points
113
Ministers claim they are deporting record numbers of people, but the figures are misleading

The Royal Court of Justice in London, Britain, August 19, 2025

The Royal Court of Justice in London, Britain, August 19, 2025 Credit: Neil Hall / Shutterstock


…Those hoping for a policy of detention and deportation will soon be disappointed. Human rights laws can prevent deportation, and Labour reject automatic deportation for those who cross the Channel. So the migrants will still end up housed in towns and cities across the country.

There are already more than twice as many migrants in private housing, including houses of multiple occupancy, than in hotels. And accommodation like this may suit a government as cynical as this one better than hotels. Individual houses provide less of a focal point for protest than hotels, and the Home Office, working with Serco, has been building up its property portfolio for some time….

By placing more of the migrants in private houses rather than hotels, the government makes it less likely that protests will take place outside those houses. Fewer asylum seekers in one place — as hotels — make their presence less of a draw for protesters.


After the disorder last year, we learnt from press leaks that an internal government paper had said asylum hotels had “stoked community tensions” and were a “critical factor behind the summer riots.” Yet when I used the Freedom of Information Act to request a copy of the paper, the Government said while the information was held, it would not be released because ministers needed a “safe space” to think about policy.

In other words, the Labour government is determined to hide the full dimensions of the migrant crisis from the people whose taxes support all those migrants. That government refuses to release information by claiming ministers need the “freedom” to discuss their policies in private. In other words, they will “work in the dark,” while the British people continue to suffer from a political class that dare not grasp the nettle of migrants entering the UK, but instead, not only lets them in, but allows them to immediately be eligible for a cornucopia of benefits, including housing that is either free or heavily subsidized, free medical care, free education including vocational training, family allowances, and more. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of British people have been waiting for years to be put into the social housing that is now being filled by economic migrants falsely claiming to be asylum seekers.


Labour is even worse than the Conservatives in its failure to adequately address the migrant crisis. It continues to accept illegal migrants who arrive by cross-Channel boats, instead of at once deporting them. It continues to ignore the wishes of the people of Britain, who are incensed with the expense of supporting these migrants, and the denial of “social housing” to the native poor in favor of providing it to migrants. They have started to come out in large numbers to protest in front of hotels housing migrants. And they are now well aware that successive governments have been hiding from them the true extent of the migrant crisis, hoping that they can continue to keep a lid on popular outrage, while putting out misleading numbers about the numbers of migrants being deported, hoping thereby to soothe popular fears. It hasn’t worked; the rage is growing at the betrayal of the British people by those who rule over them and do little or nothing to halt the migrant tide. This fury can only continue, as the effects of that inexorably increasing number of migrants — mostly Muslims — become clear, resulting in a decline in the quality of life, as the large-scale presence of Muslims has created a situation that is far more disruptive, expensive, and physically dangerous, than would be the case without that large-scale presence.


Labour’s demise can’t come fast enough for those alarmed at the demographic changes in Great Britain. Keir Starmer has reached a nadir of popularity, not just because of his government’s failure to adequately address the migrant crisis, but because his government has made a mess in its halting attempts to revive the economy. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch says all the right things about curbing migration, but when the Conservatives were in power, they were only marginally more effective than the Labour government that followed. Perhaps the voters will give their support to the Reform Party, now rising so steeply in the polls, that has made curbing illegal migration central to its policy proposals.
 
Back
Top