• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Record 10,000 turnout at Pink Dot

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/record-10-000-turnout-pink-dot-155047382.html

Record 10,000 turnout at Pink Dot
<cite id="yui_3_3_0_1_1308415665192163" class="byline vcard">By Jeanette Tan | SingaporeScene – <abbr title="2011-06-18T15:50:47Z">55 minutes ago</abbr></cite>




Pink-Dot-2010-vs-2011.jpg
Over 10,000 participants packed Hong Lim Park, more than twice the size of last year's crowd. (Photo by Pink …


A record crowd of over 10,000 turned out for Pink Dot at Hong Lim Park on Saturday evening --more than twice last year's size.

This year's Pink Dot attendance set a new record for the largest public gathering ever seen at the Speakers' Corner since it opened 11 years ago.

The event, whose aim is to raise awareness and understanding of the need to love and be loved, regardless of one's sexual orientation, was being held for the third consecutive year.

Participants were asked to come dressed in pink, to form a large circular 'dot' to show support for inclusiveness, diversity and the freedom to love, in line with its theme for this year.

Organisers had demarcated an observation area at the front of the stage for non-Singaporean or PR attendees, but the size of the dot -- the highlight of the event -- eventually filled the entire area of the park.

Event organisers were stunned, overwhelmed and humbled by the record crowd.
Pink Dot spokesperson Rebecca Ling, 27, told Yahoo! Singapore immediately after the formed Dot dispersed that she was stunned by the response.

"It wasn't a pink dot, it's a pink park!" she joked.

Co-spokesperson and legal counsel Paerin Choa, 35, added, "To have this many people celebrating this event with us is a truly humbling experience, and we are greatly touched by this show of solidarity and support from Singaporeans."


performers.jpg
Clockwise from top left: Dim Sum Dollies, Rima S, Voguelicious and Jill Marie Thomas. (Yahoo! photo/Jeanette T …


Spotted among the crowd were several local celebrities and public figures.
Apart from this year's event ambassadors, the Dim Sum Dollies -- who performed during an hour-long concert along with One Minute of Glory winner Jill Marie Thomas, all-male dance group Voguelicious, Rima S and Broadway Beng Sebastian Tan -- numerous local actors also brought friends and families to stand in the dot.


lim-kay-siu-neo-swee-lin-dad.jpg
From left to right: actress Neo Swee Lin's father, Neo Swee Lin and Lim Kay Siu. (Yahoo! photo/Jeanette Ta …


Actors Lim Kay Siu, 55, and Neo Swee Lin, 47, have been part of the Pink Dot every year since it started two years ago.

"We have always supported the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) community," Lim told Yahoo! Singapore. "So many of my friends are part of it that I'm pretty much part of it too," said Lim.

The actor said he and Neo were there to celebrate and push the issue of greater acceptance, which he said is important as the LGBT community still faces much inequality in Singapore.

"It's time for change," he added.


ben-xiao.jpg
Actor Ben Xiao poses with his show-dog, Elliot. He was at the Pink Dot with his mother. (Yahoo! photo/Jeanette …


29-year-old local actor and director of SAVASkool Ben Xiao brought his mother and show-dog Elliot to the event.

He said he was there to show support for the students in his school, which provides enrichment classes in the arts, science and sports.

"As a teacher, I see students getting bullied and stressed out--and often this makes them feel like they're doing something wrong for being different," he said.

"There is a part for everyone to play in this, and I will support the people who have the energy and passion (to further this cause)," he added.


vincent-and-friends.jpg
The SDP's Vincent Wijeysingha at Pink Dot with two friends. (Yahoo! photo/Jeanette Tan)


Singapore Democratic Party candidate Vincent Wijeysingha was also spotted, and he told Yahoo! Singapore he was there in his personal capacity with friends.


orchids.jpg
Ivan Heng and Glen Goei in all their pink floral glory. (Yahoo! photo/Jeanette Tan)


By far, the best-dressed attendees at the event were theatre thespian Ivan Heng and director Glen Goei, of Emily of Emerald Hill fame, who turned up as bright pink orchids.

"We always dress as national icons," said Heng proudly. "We are the Orchid Revolution," he added.

Apart from the stars, many foreigners were at the event in spite of restrictions preventing them from being part of the Dot.

Graphic designer Olivier, 39, a Frenchman, flew into Singapore with his friend Takuma, also 39, specially for the Pink Dot.

"It doesn't matter that we're not allowed to be part of the dot," said Olivier, who lives and works in Japan with Takuma. "We're here, we're showing our support and participating, and that's what counts."


pink-dot-merch.jpg
Pink Dot merchandise include umbrellas, fans, pom poms and the Dot plushie. (Yahoo! photo/Jeanette Tan)


Various merchandise at the event was given out for free, as were food and drink.
Pink Dot umbrellas, dot-shaped fans, pom poms and badges were distributed among participants and attendees, and budding food and beverage businesses such as soon-to-open Wok and Barrel gave away 500 chocolate cupcakes with pink frosted icing.

The massive turnout of supporters has since triggered serious consideration on the part of organisers to start looking for a new venue for next year's Pink Dot.

"We may need to look at moving this to somewhere like the Marina Barrage next year if the attendance continues to grow like this," said Ling.

Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.
 

flkyflky

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?...ith-LeeTahBar-and-ivebert&p=756472#post756472

It isn't anything positive for a better Singapore at all.

It is going towards a wrong direction, indulged by liberty which had been abused.

The reproductive purpose of human sexuality is what these people had undermined and compromised. That means they are undermining the fundamental basis of human existence. They are confused by over-civilisation and got lost with their own defective and malfunctioning reproductive functions.

The liberals are leading them on, and doing a disservice to the man kind.:mad:

This is a bad show of leadership and demonstrated blindness.

Where is limit of liberty? Where is sanity?

Human can be so defective and malfunction in every aspect including their sexuality, they can insist that they are genetically abnormal and demand to have rights to have sex with animals or machines instead of human. It is not their LIBERTY to fuck snakes dogs horses etc? Should these be RESPECTED? INDULGED? PROMOTED?

:*::eek::mad:
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?...ith-LeeTahBar-and-ivebert&p=756472#post756472

It isn't anything positive for a better Singapore at all.

It is going towards a wrong direction, indulged by liberty which had been abused.

The reproductive purpose of human sexuality is what these people had undermined and compromised. That means they are undermining the fundamental basis of human existence. They are confused by over-civilisation and got lost with their own defective and malfunctioning reproductive functions.

The liberals are leading them on, and doing a disservice to the man kind.:mad:

This is a bad show of leadership and demonstrated blindness.

Where is limit of liberty? Where is sanity?

Human can be so defective and malfunction in every aspect including their sexuality, they can insist that they are genetically abnormal and demand to have rights to have sex with animals or machines instead of human. It is not their LIBERTY to fuck snakes dogs horses etc? Should these be RESPECTED? INDULGED? PROMOTED?

:*::eek::mad:
What is so bad? We may get X-men! Men with horsedicks and women with 6 breasts who eat you after sex :smile:
 
Last edited:

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
What is so bad? We may get X-men! Men with horsedicks and women with 6 breasts who eat you after sex :smile:

Why would u want 6 breasts?
Do you have 4 hands and 2 tongues?
3 would be more than sufficient. :biggrin:
 

flkyflky

Alfrescian
Loyal
There is this silly genetic excuse that the Homos are trying to sell.

It is very bad for their own family members and relatives, they have no idea. The young people will start to think that they have homo genes since their family member have gays / lesbian, and they then tend to develop that way.

The genetic rubbish is a poison that must not be tolerated. It have to be quashed that genetic aspect of abnormality should not become a recognition nor license nor honour to insist abnormal sexual practices. The reproductive malfunction is something that needs CORRECTION. Even if some genetic factors can contribute to the relevant people become more prone to this abnormality it does not give them an honourable license to refuse correction and promote themselves as well as their defective reproduction function among straight and normal humans.

We can tolerate and not discriminate them provided that they promise their own effort to accept correction, to adjust toward normality, and to CONTRIBUTE to general society. In terms of equality it is really arbitrary and self-deception.

There are unfortunate people that are born blind for example, you can study that there are some genetic reasons, but that warrants no valid excuse for e.g. blinds to promote blindness among healthy vision people. It is their abnormality and defective biological function, we try to correct their defective vision as much as we can and accommodate them, but they must still make effort to contribute instead of influencing normal vision people to join them and sell rubbish like They Have Genetic License And Thus RIGHTS To Be Blind.

The comparison is fair. Similarly there are people with gene that subject themselves more prone to mental illness than others, that does not license them to go around shooting down people in the healthy society, citing their genetic defects as PRIVILEGE.

Gays and Lesbians are claiming an unjustified PRIVILEGE from our society, via e.g. this Pink event, to violate social rules and moral standard, and expect us to indulge their abnormal and sickening conducts. They are refusing correction and refusing to restrain their own conducts, citing some rubbish genetic excuses. There is no room for genetic reason to bend social normality compromising the straight people. You can not expect straight people to always bend rules to pamper you :mad: while you go further and further into your own sexual abnormality.

As far as equality concern, there is only a logical providence of equality, but the physical differences must not be forgotten nor neglected. A blind person have no vision, a legless person can not run, this is not equal and impossible to pretend all the away, or logical providence of equality must not go too far until it confuse ourselves and especially our children.

A healthy child must not be misled that he / she can go and break his / her healthy legs to become crippled, thinking that the society would give their DISABILITY some PRIVILEGES. This is Abuse, this is Insane, this is Sick.

If genetic defects are deemed un-correctable, then self-restrains must be applied. If defective individuals think that they are privileged, then may be Elimination Measures like Hitler's Genocide may be the only valid remedy to Genetic Cleansing, and should we consider to support that?
 

flkyflky

Alfrescian
Loyal
I hope people's senses come back to their brains instead of ass-holes. The senses in the ass-holes must not distract brains until souls are also lost.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bro, can I make couple of comments here.

I am sure the science behind this has got many decades to go before we find something conclusive or near conclusive. Personally I have come across a single class that had an effeminate chap and in their midst of their puberty. By the end of the year, 6 or 7 chaps sitting around him turned effeminate and began cross dressing including a school footballer. They got caught by anti-vice in Holiday Inn in the company of airline crew. So the odds does it indicate that a fair bit of influence does play a part. One the other hand, those who are left handed, very creative and this is very much the physiology of the brain, tend to go towards the alternative side. People like Ivan Heng, Alfian Saat and many like them are not only exceptionally bright and are exceptionally creative. They bring colour to this world, write some wonderful literature, explore the human mind and make the world a nicer place.

But more importantly, they are not criminals, bad or negative components of society. They are no different to you and me. Frankly I rather shoot half the PAP MPs who are leeches and lowlife. But these chaps do experience the wrath of society and therefore are more cluely about oppression and have begun to fight back both for their own agenda and the wider agenda of society.

I think sensible people get upset with them when they go overboard and paint themselves as perpetual victims with rampant paranoia and then hijack the wider agenda of society or worse still start to surreptitiously place their interest over more important issues. My sense it is a small minority while others are perfectly good citizens. Just cut them some slack. It takes all sorts to make the world go around.




There is this silly genetic excuse that the Homos are trying to sell.

It is very bad for their own family members and relatives, they have no idea. The young people will start to think that they have homo genes since their family member have gays / lesbian, and they then tend to develop that way.
?
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Gays seem to be only category of freaks that are proud of their defective genes.:eek:

And before anyone starts telling me that they aren't defective.. just different, may I remind everyone what would happen to their gene pool if all the gays in the world were sent to some remote island and left there to fend for themselves. They'd be extinct in a single generation. That's how defective they are.:rolleyes:
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
U must mean orifices bro! :biggrin:
Well, u can always rotate or u can be like Maximilian Chua-Heng. :biggrin:

Sorry, typo mistakes, orifices yes!. Two B's & can only rotate two at a time...not a rolodex you know...ha ha ha:biggrin:
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
One the other hand, those who are left handed, very creative and this is very much the physiology of the brain, tend to go towards the alternative side. People like Ivan Heng, Alfian Saat and many like them are not only exceptionally bright and are exceptionally creative. They bring colour to this world, write some wonderful literature, explore the human mind and make the world a nicer place.

Thanks for the explanation. Helps me understand our PM.
 

flkyflky

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bro, can I make couple of comments here.

I am sure the science behind this has got many decades to go before we find something conclusive or near conclusive. Personally I have come across a single class that had an effeminate chap and in their midst of their puberty. By the end of the year, 6 or 7 chaps sitting around him turned effeminate and began cross dressing including a school footballer. They got caught by anti-vice in Holiday Inn in the company of airline crew. So the odds does it indicate that a fair bit of influence does play a part. One the other hand, those who are left handed, very creative and this is very much the physiology of the brain, tend to go towards the alternative side. People like Ivan Heng, Alfian Saat and many like them are not only exceptionally bright and are exceptionally creative. They bring colour to this world, write some wonderful literature, explore the human mind and make the world a nicer place.

But more importantly, they are not criminals, bad or negative components of society. They are no different to you and me. Frankly I rather shoot half the PAP MPs who are leeches and lowlife. But these chaps do experience the wrath of society and therefore are more cluely about oppression and have begun to fight back both for their own agenda and the wider agenda of society.

I think sensible people get upset with them when they go overboard and paint themselves as perpetual victims with rampant paranoia and then hijack the wider agenda of society or worse still start to surreptitiously place their interest over more important issues. My sense it is a small minority while others are perfectly good citizens. Just cut them some slack. It takes all sorts to make the world go around.

I have friends in that area also, my army bunkmate is one. Shim will go seduce soldier to fuck own backside in orgy until report sick for asshole torn - literally and I saw medical record in docket when I was attached to S1 while shim ROD. The medical center drew diagram of ripped ass-hole inside the medical docket.:*:

I even got discriminated because of shim, the SAF call them 302. Sharing the same bunk the other soldiers will tease me to be same 302 Ah Kua also. Sick or not?

Because this 302 seduced straight soldiers, the straight soldiers got converted to homosexual or bi-sexual after this experience. They are talking in the camp how this 302 suck and fuck, and compared to their GFs. Don't count the HIV spreading in SAF yet. If SAF discipline could effectively restrict this, I think those seduced soldiers will remain straight.

This bunkmate, has nephews. They have grown up today to know that they have a 302 uncle. How does the concept of genetic homo affect the sexuality of these young men? They know that they have similar genes with their 302 uncle. Will then then tend to fuck with their backside instead of dick?

:rolleyes::eek:

Indulgence and pampering would not help to correct sexuality disorder. A accepting society will facilitate their abnormality to run amok. They will develop only further. They will want to be married and make test tube babies. Adopt orphans etc etc. They want to abolish 377A. Then they will want bible and koran amend to suit their sexuality. There is no end as long as the society and nation kept giving in and treat them with softest touch. It is about ABUSE of PRIVILEGE & TOLERANCE.

There is this wheel chair guy in Tampines, demanding people to push him around in the Town center, some softhearted young students got abused / obliged / taken advantage off, to go way out of their own way to push him to super market etc. When all they tried kindly was to push his wheel chair across a busy pedestrian crossing. He will take advantage asked to be push 500m 1km I had seen.:mad: That is the problem!

Another frequent thing I saw in Tempine MRT area, is the blinds use a dirty tactic to sell their peanuts packages etc at high price. They will sit down in middle of road divider of a pedestrian crossing! Pretending confused! Then when you helped him up, he ask you to buy $5 packet of peanut that 7-11 sells @$3! Many softhearted people got taken advantage of. I saw that many times, and I called police to arrest them. I think they are syndicate from Malaysia!

:mad::mad:

We can not let our softness be taken for a ride by every Tom Dick Harry or Bapok! Know the limits. Think further and look further.
 
Last edited:

IR123

Alfrescian
Loyal
Looks like their agenda to further gay rights are gathering momentum

So far, they are spearheaded by Dr Vincent in politics;

their PR efforts in Pink Dot promoting it as 'tolerance' when it is 'gay movement';

the gay sauna bars.


What else?
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
I'm alright with gays doing what they want as long as they don't ask the state to allow them to marry.

The one opposition person whose position on gays that reasonates with me is JBJ. He believes in freedom of gays in society, accept them holding hands etc. but not marriages which is an institution that started from the beginning.

Any opposition who wants to extol JBJ's name has to remember this, especially Vincent and Kenneth because both SDP and RP like to hang around JBJ's name. Do not turn JBJ into some pro-gay chap.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Many of us feel the same. Marriage and child adoption are out.

I'm alright with gays doing what they want as long as they don't ask the state to allow them to marry.

The one opposition person whose position on gays that reasonates with me is JBJ. He believes in freedom of gays in society, accept them holding hands etc. but not marriages which is an institution that started from the beginning.

Any opposition who wants to extol JBJ's name has to remember this, especially Vincent and Kenneth because both SDP and RP like to hang around JBJ's name. Do not turn JBJ into some pro-gay chap.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bro, you are very observant and I know where you are coming from. Also share your views on helping people. I do realise that society must not keep quiet and need to act.

The 6 to 7 kids in that particular class were lost by the age of 15. Sadly the teacher and the school failed by not acting earlier. By the time the police stepped in, it was too late.



I have friends in that area also, my army bunkmate is one. Shim will go seduce soldier to fuck own backside in orgy until report sick for asshole torn - literally and I saw medical record in docket when I was attached to S1 while shim ROD. The medical center drew diagram of ripped ass-hole inside the medical docket.:*:

I .
 

Thomas Lee

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is an exchange currently going on at TOC under the header "Hong Lim Park turns into a sea of Pink"

Below is my message to the smearing and censorship practised by the TOC.

Hopefully, the homosexuals will turn up in full force in this forum and say what they have to say and be countered without resorting to their feeble crutch of censorship as their "argument".


Thomas Lee 20 June 2011
To all the homosexuals.

Not sure if this message will be censored by TOC again.

I will continue this exchange at Sam Alfresco Heaven. This will be my last post in this forum.

The attempt by TOC to smear me and censor my views by dishonestly claiming I was “astroturfing”, “writing under different pseudonyms” and making ‘reasonable’ questions as ‘Thomas’” but “make(ing) hateful comments as ‘Ang’” makes the TOC no different from the PAP mouthpiece, The Straits Time.




43 Responses to “Hong Lim Park turns into a sea of Pink [UPDATED WITH PHOTOS]”

abu 19 June 2011
the PM loves PINK too.
watch the way he walks and crosses his legs when he sits.

opposition parties should hold monyhly rallies here.
discuss n engage the public on latest parliamentary isues.

NOT jus wait till 2016 to be seen n hear.
a different party every month.
carry forth t energy created in 2011 rallies.

u MUST continue engage t public to maintain the mometum


abu 19 June 2011
i mean- monthly rallies


Sadar 19 June 2011
Looks like the organizers are inflating the attendance numbers. Judging from the picture, and the limited size of Hong Lim Park, no way is this 10,000. At best 1,000, max 2,000, people.


Blah 19 June 2011
@ Sadar: Nonsense. A typical school hall which is but a fraction of Hong Lim Park’s area can already hold more than a thousand sitting, much less standing.

In any case the picture can be zoomed in. Does that look like anything near 2000 people only?


David 19 June 2011
Oleh, Oleh oleh oleh! Repeal 377A and bring back the love and freedom GLBT deserves. Otherwise PAP will get what they deserved come 2015 election.


Thomas Lee 19 June 2011
You can always count on homosexuals with their sexual fetish for the same sex to turn up for what is essentially a circus and freak show and then proclaim it as a success.

The reality is that if homosexuality is indeed “normal” and “genetic”, it would have died out a long time ago as their genes cannot be passed on.

These homosexuals should seek psychiatric help for their personality and sexual disorders.


Sayang Singapura 19 June 2011
Is it too costly and too stressful to raise a family and bring up children in Singapore?

Could this be one of the main contributing factors why red dot is turning pink in relatively short time just like the unnatural influx of foreign workers?

Never mind all these. What says the govt then?


agongkia 19 June 2011
Get them to wear red and white during NDP.That will be more practical.


GAYbriel 19 June 2011
@ Thomas – being gay is a natural / normal occurrence in the animal kingdom and human society. If everybody were straight and bred like rabbits, the explosion of human population would’ve killed the earth a long time ago. It’s just nature’s way of cubing population growth.

Thus, you shouldn’t be surprised when you look around your family. 100% sure somehow somewhere, you’ll have someone in your family who is gay. Perhaps your cousin, or your aunt, or your sister, or brother. Or perhaps, your very own son.

Question is – how do you deal with that?


Sean 19 June 2011
well, just like you can count on stupid & ignorant people like Thomas Lee to say dumb things, like heterosexuals don’t have sexual fetish. & being hardly a geneticist, that’s big talk for proclaiming that genes can’t be passed down just because gay people don’t have kids. try coming home earlier one of these days. you might find your girlfriend/wife/daughter trying on your underwear, THEN you come here & spew your crap about fetishes.


Lop 19 June 2011
@Thomas

I’ll offer you an explanation why the ‘homosexual gene’ is being passed on – because everyone carries it. It’s just a matter of how much of this gene is being expressed, that explains why someone is predominantly heterosexual or homosexual or bisexual.

On the other hand, we have seen enough of people who spoke the most vehemently against LGBT and turned out to be secretly homosexual themselves. Teg Haggard, Mark Foley etc.

Perhaps you should seek psychiatric help so you can finally come to terms with your attration to the same sex. Your psychiatrist will tell you that being homosexual is not a psychiatric illness, but homophobia is.


La 19 June 2011
@Thomas

Your views on genetics are simplistic. Many genes can be passed down without being active (consider colour blindness), and many traits are the result of not one or two but the combination of expression of several genes. This is a field in which there are many things that we do not yet know so perhaps you shouldn’t be so dismissive.


Hm 19 June 2011
Too many stupid people in Singapore. I’m not referring to the LGBT community but to everyone who hates them. I’m a straight guy and I used to be homophobic but now that I’m a little older, I realized we’re all human beings who need to respect each other by the very virtue that we’re all HUMAN.

Now, I may not support gay rights causes, but if that’s what helps a group of people to be happier, more content with their lives, then so be it. How the heck does this affect us straight people anyway? It doesnt. Wake up homophobes.


Oliver E. 19 June 2011
@ Thomas Lee

Exactly, homosexuality would have died out millions of years ago but you can’t deny it sill exists.
I ask you why?
Does gods nature not always extinguish unnecessary elements consequently?
Rather, couldn’t be there a much higher reason for the existence of homosexuality silly humans (still) don’t understand?
Or is gods nature silly perhaps?


Goreng Pisang 19 June 2011
I am really amazed how many gays and lesbians exist in singapore.

Thanks to the low quality of life, stress and influx allowing all sorts of people ease of access to more lobangs than 1. Eg. access to singapore job market.

Is this contributing factor to LOWER BIRTH RATE given that they by definition cannot naturally reproduce?

Singapore!
1st world!

Open the Floodgates to all !!

Success.


Thomas Lee 19 June 2011
To: Gaybriel

If I had a child who is suffering from a sexual disorder of being a homosexual, I will send him/her for psychiatric treatment.

It is “NO* different for me seeking medical help if my child were born with some other disorders like autism, aspergers, etc.

Just because it is a sexual disorder does not make it “normal”. Get it?

Now tell me, if you had a child who has a obsession with having sex with dogs, would you treat it as “normal” or would you send your child for psychiatric treatment?


To: Thomas’ son.

Wishing that I get a gay offspring is not going to cause me pain. As I said, I will simply send that kid to have his sexual disorder treated.

Best for gays to acknowledge that their homosexuality is a sexual disorder and that they should seek medical teatment for it just as they would if they were suffering from any illness or disorder.


Thomas Lee 19 June 2011
To Hm:

I don’t hate homosexuals. I pity them.

What I do hate though is their militancy in provocatively pushing their agenda in the public arena.

Do what you want to do in the privacy of your bedrooms. Try to push your aberrant sexual behaviour into the faces of the public and promote it to impressionable kids as “normal” and you can and will get a response.



To Pinkies 19 June 2011
There has been no CHANGE since the Election.

All the talk about Change brought no change. Which policy has changed?

Obama won by selling Change.

What has he achieved?

I think many things.

But what??


Aer 19 June 2011
To Thomas Lee

When you say its “Best” for gays to acknowledge their homosexuality and seek medical treatment its like asking a person suffering from polydactylism why s/he didn’t amputate that extra thumb or toe. Ridiculous and inappropriate isn’t it?

For one, it’s none of your business and more importantly, I get the feeling you are insinuating that homosexuality is not only a sexual disorder, but it is socially unacceptable and morally wrong( correct me if I’m wrong). That’s no different from discriminating against a Down’s Syndrome patient simply because he is a minority and hence termed “abnormal”.

My point is, for people exhibiting homo- or bisexual tendencies due to genetics, it is their RIGHT and CHOICE to maintain or seek to treat the disorder. From what I see, a problem should only arise if their actions infringe upon the rights of others and in this case, I see none of the latter. So really may I ask if you are simply homophobic or you just love to shoot your mouth off because technically speaking you have the right to freedom of speech, regardless of the validity or the strength of your argument?

Btw, no offense but “The reality..genes cannot be passed on” demonstrates your ignorance in the field of genetics and hereditary. Oh and calling the event “a circus and freak show” isn’t very civilised.

Cheers.


Van 19 June 2011
@Thomas Lee

Are you a deeply closeted self-hating homosexual yourself? Awwww it must be really difficult for you to have so much hate for yourself. I pity you. Embrace yourself and stop hating!!

Lots of love for you <3<3<3<3<3


La 19 June 2011
@Thomas Lee:

Then you admit defeat in your argument that it can not be natural?

The basis of the argument for equal treatment is that homosexuality is neurobiological at birth. In other words, it cannot be changed, and by definition is not a lifestyle choice. Indeed, there is considerable evidence to suggest that this might be the case. Meanwhile, attempts at “curing” homosexuals have, to this date, failed. In view of that, the morality of condemning homosexuals who cannot help being attracted to other humans of the same gender is questionable. As a result of this, homosexuality is no longer recognised as a psychiatric disease by the American Psychiatric Association and the World Health Organisation.

Given these circumstances, the events that you deride as “circuses” are an attempt by the LGBT community to be recognised and to push for equal treatment under the law.

Another argument that is brought up in support of decriminalising homosexual acts between two people is that the acts are themselves consensual, between two adults. It is this argument that you attempt to rail against, having failed to address whether it is natural. Now, you equating incest and bestiality with homosexuality as deviant practices that are merely lifestyle choices. This is a straw man argument and I will not humour you by being drawn into this.


Alan Tang 19 June 2011
Cheers to all! Horray! Keep up the momemtum! Make it even bigger next time.


love 19 June 2011
@Thomas Lee

When did you choose to be straight? Do tell.


fonkie 19 June 2011
The more Pinkies, the more we would need foreigners to augment the population size. Dunno what i mean? too bad.


mental disorder 19 June 2011
@Thomas Lee

You should go and get your mental disorder treated as well. It is best that you quickly admit that your mind is not ‘normal’ and stop pushing your agenda of what is ‘normal’ and what is ‘not normal’ to the public.

Saying homophobic or back-dated misconception about homosexuality doesn’t pains me.

I don’t hate you. I just simply pity you.

If I’m your dad, I’ll just send you to the doctor to get your mental disorder fixed. Don’t see why you are so upset about this issue if you are not personally affected by it.

Are you afraid that children can be promoted to be gay? Let me tell you that gay children have been and have always been growing up in a heterosexual environment, heterosexual family, heterosexual school, heterosexual friends and yet they still turn gay.

Apparently, you are not very well-read and knowledgeable in this topic that you seemingly have such a strong opinion on.

Sometimes I wonder where does your hate for homosexuality came about. We would like to understand your view to come to understand you better.

You are the type of person who, say will send their aged parents to nursing home, just because they are old, senile, frail and lost touch of the world.

You are exactly just that. A heartless heterosexual. Is sex really such a big thing to you? Is sexual orientation such a big part of your life?

Are you aware that for many gay people, sexual orientation is only a very small part of their life. Sex is just a very small part of being a homosexual.

Please read up and find out more about this topic before you make yourself look more stupid than you already are.


ignorant 19 June 2011
@Thomas Lee

You are just a very ignorant person who do not really have much in depth knowledge about this topic which you seemingly have a very strong opinion on.

I suggest you educate yourself and find enlightenment in the process. After all, sex is just a very small part of a person.


Freak 19 June 2011
@Ang

LOL another homophobic heterosexual who assumed I’m a homosexual. I’m a straight woman who support the freedom to love and find your ignorance both offensive and disturbing.

I’m ashamed to be associated with you. You are the freak dear.


Thomas Lee 19 June 2011
To Aers:

I have never stated that “its “Best” for gays to acknowledge their homosexuality and seek medical treatment”.

What I said it is best to for them to realise that their homosexuality is a sexual disorder.

That’s a world of difference between what I said and why you claimed I said.

And contrary to what you said, it becomes my business when homosexuals move out from what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms and try to market their sexual disorder as being “normal” in the public arena.

Do it in your bedrooms and it is indeed none of my and the public’s business. Do it in the public arena and it becomes my and the public’s business to destroy the agenda that the homosexuals are pushing under the guise of fighting for “human rights”.

<>

Simple test to this. Put as many homosexuals as you want on an island all by themselves. Wait for one generation to pass to see whether they can reproduce themselves and pass on their genes or whether they will die out.

<>

What else would you call a flamboyant and garish gathering for the right to promote a group suffering from a sexual disorder that they demand to be recognised as “normal”?



theonlinecitizen 19 June 2011
‘Thomas’, stop astro-turfing to write under different pseudonyms. You ask ‘reasonable’ questions as ‘Thomas’ and make hateful comments as ‘Ang’.



Thomas Lee 19 June 2011
A lot of chest beating, foaming and frothing at the mouth about homophobia, hate, etc but nothing of substance from the homosexuals.

None of these homosexuals are able to disprove the obvious, i.e that they will die out and will not be able to pass on their genes if left on an island all by themselves.

The public must shed any fear of being labelled hateful, homophobic and destroy the idea that these homos are marketing to the young and impressionable, that their aberrant sexual behaviour and lifestyle choice is “genetic” and hence, should be considered “normal”.



Chris L 19 June 2011
@Thomas: What’s IS your pre-occupation with reproduction? Lessons we learnt from studying the history of the Earth is that no species last forever! Humans will become extinct one of these days. If not, over-population of humans will destroy the earth first. Then, there will be NO island for you to speak of.

Ha!

By the way, you call it a disorder, but we call it natural. Oh, and I do think your pre-occupation of GLBTs rather homophobic. To us, HOMOPHOBIA is a disorder too.

Why do I say that?

A recent study from the Department of Psychology at University of Georgia at Athens found that homophobic men are aroused by watching gay porn, while non-homophobic men are not.

OOOohhh … Hi Thomas :wink:


Thomas Lee 19 June 2011
To Chris L:

You can quote as many studies as you want to about sexual arousals, etc.

But it will not address the obvious, that homos cannot reproduce themselves and hence their sexual disorder is not genetically “normal”.

If you have a child who suffers from autism or who prefers sex with his pet dog, you will recognise it as abnormal and a disorder and seek medical treatment for the disorder.

Why must a sexual disorder like “homosexuality be deemed different when even other sexual disorders like sex addiction or sniffing used panties are deemed to be abnormal and medical treatment is deemed neccessary to treat the sexual disorder?

What’s so special about homosexuals that they must be deemed “normal” and be excused from medical treatment?

Lop 19 June 2011
Hey Thomas Lee

Who says homosexuals can’t reproduce? Didn’t you hear that the likes of Ted Haggard and Georgre Rekers all have kids?

And the things you said sounded awfully just like them. I bet you have kids or will have kids someday. But unfortunately does not make you less gay.


Thomas Lee 19 June 2011
To Lop:

I don’t have any interest in the private lives of homosexuals and don’t know who Ted Haggard or George Rykers are.

I will happily concede to homosexuals that their behaviour is a result of normal genes and their sexual disorder are actually normal if they can prove to me that they will be able to reproduce themselves in an island colony comprising of only homosexual men or in an island colony comprising of only homosexual women.


Aes 19 June 2011
To dear Thomas Lee
No you said “These homosexuals should seek psychiatric help for their personality and sexual disorders” so the crux of my argument still fits the bill

And your “simple experiment” is simply…sheer brilliance. In your previous post you stated that “if homosexuality is indeed “normal” and “genetic”, it would have died out a
long time ago as their genes cannot be passed on.” and then your proposed the island experiment to justify your statement. Well let’s try this: place infertile individuals on an island and see if they can reproduce to pass down alleles coding for infertility…yet it’s clear as daylight that there are still many suffering from infertility today now is there? Seriously do you even know the fundamental basis of your experiment..

and just in case you try to toy with semantics, when people term homosexuality as genetically normal, they are specifically referring to the inheritance of that gene as being a natural process, just like how we have people of varying heights. Being extremely tall doesn’t mean you are ABNORMAL, it is just that the frequency of expressing that particular phenotype is extremely low.

now you can go run along on your personal vendetta against the campaign for gay rights. Please don’t drag “the public” into this. Like-minded individuals + you =/= public.


chin K 19 June 2011
Having to prove ourselves is as ludicrous as demanding heterosexual men to prove that they are not gay should a group of them be stranded on an island. But do consider this, if there is no food on the island, humankind have been known to eat their own for survival and that is not a pretty picture.
Also, recognising the self-interst that is human nature, after quarrels, disputes, fights, wars, genocide, total oblivion, the Earth still goes on, the land teeming back grass and trees and ushering a new era of life. We would be vain indeed to think we are all that matters to nature.


Chris L 19 June 2011
Thomas Lee said: What’s so special about homosexuals that they must be deemed “normal” and be excused from medical treatment?

Medical treatment ah? You live in Singapore right? You go to IMH and ask the doctor got medical treatment for curing the gay in you or not lah.

You know what he will tell you to do? “Go home, don’t waste my time” is what he will tell you.

You know why? Cuz in Singapore, homosexuality is NOT a mental nor is it a physical illness. I didn’t decide on this. The MOH decided on it.

So .. what are you gonna do about it? Thomas – you can’t cure the gay in you. Please be at peace with yourself… :p


Blah 19 June 2011
To Thomas Lee

Well, let’s take your experiment to another level shall we? Let’s have an island where there are only men (heterosexual and homosexual) and no women. There would be no reproduction as well… there are only men, so it is obvious that “they will die out and will not be able to pass on their genes if left on an island all by themselves”.

Subsequently, by your logic all the men should accept the fact that being male is part and parcel of being hapless, hopeless victims of a “sexual disorder”. You probably would suggest that they ask for psychological treatment and therefore change their sex or something no?


Lawrence 19 June 2011
It’s fascinating to hear when something is labeled a “disorder”. Did you know that naughty kids these days can be diagnosed as having “oppositional defiant disorder” or “conduct disorder” by psychiatrists? And of course, it comes with some medication to “fix” the kid.

And past generations of Singaporeans probably never heard of ADHD/ADD and autism. Back then such kids were labeled as naughty or weird.

So the point is, medical science isn’t always useful or helpful. Yes, it’s a “science” because it is rational — and many other non-sciences can be helpful too, eg. TCM, religious faith, self-confidence.

Science is a tool for humanity, let’s not use it to judge or destroy ourselves.


La 19 June 2011
“And past generations of Singaporeans probably never heard of ADHD/ADD and autism. Back then such kids were labeled as naughty or weird.

So the point is, medical science isn’t always useful or helpful. Yes, it’s a “science” because it is rational — and many other non-sciences can be helpful too, eg. TCM, religious faith, self-confidence.”

Disagree. Science is useful in this instance because it allows us finer-grained labels than “naughty” or “weird” to explain their behaviour. Whether it is helpful to do so is another issue (although I would say, yes).


Tough Mom of Gay Son 19 June 2011
I think the wholesomeness of Pink Dot is in a way a sort of Protest against the past slutiness of Singapore’s gay activists who promoted gay saunas and gay hook up web sites in stead of having an intelligent way to bridge out to straight people. More straight people showed up cause Pink Dot is family oriented and wholesome. Don’t take this sacred trust for granted. Parents are tired of gay activists like Alex Au who want to turn Pink Dot into the Folsom Street Fair. Glad he stayed far in the background otherwise no straight people would come. He’s the kind of person no one likes whether gay or straight, I think he watches the Human Centipede a lot when no one is watching. Hurray for gay wholesomeness.


purebred 20 June 2011
Why not turn the 10,000 people into protesters and fight our rights and justice Singaporeans?


Thomas Lee 20 June 2011
To TOC:

Why is my response(see below) still under moderation? Shouldn’t I have the right to respond to your dishonest and false claim that I was “astroturfing”, etc?

What “astroturfing” rubbish are you talking about? I post as one Thomas and one Thomas alone.

If you have the evidence that I am indeed “Ang” or anyone else, produce it.

I do not have to rely on different nicks to take on any homosexuals, no matter their numbers and no matter how vociferous they are.

If you would like to use your lousy and baseless “astroturfing” accusations to ban me from posting, go ahead.

But do yourself a favour first. Produce that evidence that I am “Ang” or whoever else you claim I am supposed to be.

Your comment is awaiting moderation.



Thomas Lee 20 June 2011
To all the homosexuals.

Not sure if this message will be censored by TOC again.

I will continue this exchange at Sam Alfresco Heaven. This will be my last post in this forum.

The attempt by TOC to smear me and censor my views by dishonestly claiming I was “astroturfing”, “writing under different pseudonyms” and making ‘reasonable’ questions as ‘Thomas’” but “make(ing) hateful comments as ‘Ang’” makes the TOC no different from the PAP mouthpiece, The Straits Time.
 

IR123

Alfrescian
Loyal
The one opposition person whose position on gays that reasonates with me is JBJ. He believes in freedom of gays in society, accept them holding hands etc. but not marriages which is an institution that started from the beginning.


Does JBJ advocate the use of the political platform to further gay rights?
 
Top