Transmodified from hxxp://www.todayonline.com/Hotnews/EDC130118-0000050/Pastors-plea-to-retain-Section-377A-sparks-online-furore
PEASANTPORE - A plea by a pruddish church bastard - made during morning service last Sunday - to former Regent Goh Chok Tong against the repeal of Victorian Section 377A of the Penal Code. This dated law which criminalises sex between bapoks, has drawn strong reactions from the netizens and many well educated bapoks.
Former Regent Ah Goh Goh was indulging in some retail politics, happened to pass by the Faith Community Baptist Church (FCBC) during his regular walkabout in his Marine Parade constituency. He was cunningly 'invited' by the church leaders to meet the congregation and appeared to be unprepared for the drama thereafter.
While former Regent Goh was on the stage in the church's auditorium, FCBC senior bastard Lawrence Khong (picture) read from a prepared statement to slam bapoks. Among other things, he called the effort to repeal Section 377A "a looming threat" to the X'tians who still thinks the fables in the Old Testament, (aka bad translation of the Torah), actually took place and must be interpreted literally.
"We X'tians see bapoks as the real threat to silly religions because they usually read Jane Austen books and can frame many clever arguements to make us look like baboons. Therefore we want to ask the regime to balk bapoks seeking to repeal Victorian Section 377A of the Penal Code. The Qing dynasty Chinks rather have a wrong calendar than a correct calendar of yore. So do we....we rather have the wrong understanding then reach a right conclusion that if bapoks like to screw themselves, then they jolly well go ahead and arse fark themselves," said Bastard Khong.
Bastard Khong who exhorted the regime to "provide moral aid to crush the Bapoks who are more vocal than the indolent pagans and subdued local moslems". It must be noted that many pagans were marginalised, their temples demolished and religious practices curtailed e.g. banning incense burning at many public places, Thaipusam obstructed with many rules etc. The Moslems reached a truce with X'tians that Mats are off limits to conversion and there are little flash incidents other than a few zealots sending wrong pamplets to Moslem homes.
In response, former Regent Ah Goh, drawing from his experiences fending off KTV gals, made a general remark that peasants are free to stand by their beliefs because now they can vote to upset Ruler Loong: "Hokkien people say, do not be kuai lan and and you'll be ok."
The church, which has 10,000 cash cow who donates regularly, has posted Bastard Kwong's full statement, accompanied by photographs of former Regent Goh at the church, on its website and on Bastard Khong's Facebook page. This is to present a facade that Regent Goh endorses the Baptist's stand on the need to balk bapoks.
The statement has been reposted on several online forums and websites in a barely disguised move to sparke anger among the bapoks and their supporters.
Yesterday, Reverend Miak Siew, executive pastor of Peasantpore's pro-bapok Free Community Church and member of bapok advocacy group Bapoks Like Us, questioned on Fridae.asia the timing of the statement. He crowed that two constitutional challenges against Section 377A will be heard in the High Court and the Baptists are using dirty tricks to cow bapoks.
One was filed last November by bapoks who have been screwing each other for 180 full moons. They bemoaned as while poking each others' arse, their pleasure are lessen because they say the law entrenches "stigma and discrimination against bapoks, make them feel bad".
The other follows a successful appeal by bapok Tan Eng Hong, who was busted for having stage an oral sex with another bapok at a public toilet in CityLink Mall in March 2010. He cleverly applied to have 377A of the Penal Code declared unconstitutional for violating his right to screw his partners' arse or lick his cock in public. He apparently did not realise Asiatic horny bastards love to see naked women or couples farking each other but bapoks having a good time is certainly non-kosher and lead to nightmares or immediate weight loss.
Bapok Miak also wrote an open letter on his Facebook page to Bastard Khong: "Lumpar ok. In the past, Greeks also like to screw each other, man or woman. You screw, I screw, you happy, I also happy, where got rule cannot doggy each another. Chink history also got bapok Emperors, will you dare to tell a bapok Emperor that anal sex is sinful? Ah Kwong, go read your history books.... Nihons also have bapoks but they not thrashing their own people because of a foreign textbook pretending to be a holy book right?
KNNCCB, just because some ancient Jews do not like bapoks and write that in Torah does not mean all bapoks are bad ok. Can study some Quantum Mechanics and get the picture or not? Not all anal sex bapoks are bad bapoks. Also got straight peasants who are bad, bad parents right? You really a lumpar, perhaps you join our orgies and we show you how pleasurable bapok sex is and you may even clamour for more hor!"
PEASANTPORE - A plea by a pruddish church bastard - made during morning service last Sunday - to former Regent Goh Chok Tong against the repeal of Victorian Section 377A of the Penal Code. This dated law which criminalises sex between bapoks, has drawn strong reactions from the netizens and many well educated bapoks.
Former Regent Ah Goh Goh was indulging in some retail politics, happened to pass by the Faith Community Baptist Church (FCBC) during his regular walkabout in his Marine Parade constituency. He was cunningly 'invited' by the church leaders to meet the congregation and appeared to be unprepared for the drama thereafter.
While former Regent Goh was on the stage in the church's auditorium, FCBC senior bastard Lawrence Khong (picture) read from a prepared statement to slam bapoks. Among other things, he called the effort to repeal Section 377A "a looming threat" to the X'tians who still thinks the fables in the Old Testament, (aka bad translation of the Torah), actually took place and must be interpreted literally.
"We X'tians see bapoks as the real threat to silly religions because they usually read Jane Austen books and can frame many clever arguements to make us look like baboons. Therefore we want to ask the regime to balk bapoks seeking to repeal Victorian Section 377A of the Penal Code. The Qing dynasty Chinks rather have a wrong calendar than a correct calendar of yore. So do we....we rather have the wrong understanding then reach a right conclusion that if bapoks like to screw themselves, then they jolly well go ahead and arse fark themselves," said Bastard Khong.
Bastard Khong who exhorted the regime to "provide moral aid to crush the Bapoks who are more vocal than the indolent pagans and subdued local moslems". It must be noted that many pagans were marginalised, their temples demolished and religious practices curtailed e.g. banning incense burning at many public places, Thaipusam obstructed with many rules etc. The Moslems reached a truce with X'tians that Mats are off limits to conversion and there are little flash incidents other than a few zealots sending wrong pamplets to Moslem homes.
In response, former Regent Ah Goh, drawing from his experiences fending off KTV gals, made a general remark that peasants are free to stand by their beliefs because now they can vote to upset Ruler Loong: "Hokkien people say, do not be kuai lan and and you'll be ok."
The church, which has 10,000 cash cow who donates regularly, has posted Bastard Kwong's full statement, accompanied by photographs of former Regent Goh at the church, on its website and on Bastard Khong's Facebook page. This is to present a facade that Regent Goh endorses the Baptist's stand on the need to balk bapoks.
The statement has been reposted on several online forums and websites in a barely disguised move to sparke anger among the bapoks and their supporters.
Yesterday, Reverend Miak Siew, executive pastor of Peasantpore's pro-bapok Free Community Church and member of bapok advocacy group Bapoks Like Us, questioned on Fridae.asia the timing of the statement. He crowed that two constitutional challenges against Section 377A will be heard in the High Court and the Baptists are using dirty tricks to cow bapoks.
One was filed last November by bapoks who have been screwing each other for 180 full moons. They bemoaned as while poking each others' arse, their pleasure are lessen because they say the law entrenches "stigma and discrimination against bapoks, make them feel bad".
The other follows a successful appeal by bapok Tan Eng Hong, who was busted for having stage an oral sex with another bapok at a public toilet in CityLink Mall in March 2010. He cleverly applied to have 377A of the Penal Code declared unconstitutional for violating his right to screw his partners' arse or lick his cock in public. He apparently did not realise Asiatic horny bastards love to see naked women or couples farking each other but bapoks having a good time is certainly non-kosher and lead to nightmares or immediate weight loss.
Bapok Miak also wrote an open letter on his Facebook page to Bastard Khong: "Lumpar ok. In the past, Greeks also like to screw each other, man or woman. You screw, I screw, you happy, I also happy, where got rule cannot doggy each another. Chink history also got bapok Emperors, will you dare to tell a bapok Emperor that anal sex is sinful? Ah Kwong, go read your history books.... Nihons also have bapoks but they not thrashing their own people because of a foreign textbook pretending to be a holy book right?
KNNCCB, just because some ancient Jews do not like bapoks and write that in Torah does not mean all bapoks are bad ok. Can study some Quantum Mechanics and get the picture or not? Not all anal sex bapoks are bad bapoks. Also got straight peasants who are bad, bad parents right? You really a lumpar, perhaps you join our orgies and we show you how pleasurable bapok sex is and you may even clamour for more hor!"
Last edited:
