• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Rampant Fraud Threat to China’s Ascent

GoFlyKiteNow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
2,605
Points
0
Rampant Fraud Threat to China’s Ascent
By ANDREW JACOBS
Published: October 6, 2010

BEIJING — No one disputes Zhang Wuben’s talents as a salesman. Through television shows, DVDs and a best-selling book, he convinced millions of people that raw eggplant and immense quantities of mung beans could cure lupus, diabetes, depression and cancer.

For $450, seriously ill patients could buy a 10-minute consultation and a prescription — except Mr. Zhang, one of the most popular practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine, was booked through 2012.

But when the price of mung beans skyrocketed this spring, Chinese journalists began digging deeper. They learned that contrary to his claims, Mr. Zhang, 47, was not from a long line of doctors (his father was a weaver). Nor did he earn a degree from Beijing Medical University (his only formal education, it turned out, was the brief correspondence course he took after losing his job at a textile mill).

The exposure of Mr. Zhang’s faked credentials provoked a fresh round of hand-wringing over what many scholars and Chinese complain are the dishonest practices that permeate society, including students who cheat on college entrance exams, scholars who promote fake or unoriginal research, and dairy companies that sell poisoned milk to infants.

The most recent string of revelations has been bracing. After a plane crash in August killed 42 people in northeast China, officials discovered that 100 pilots who worked for the airline’s parent company had falsified their flying histories.

Then there was the padded résumé of Tang Jun, the millionaire former head of Microsoft China and something of a national hero, who falsely claimed to have received a doctorate from the California Institute of Technology.


Plagiarism and Fakery

Her findings are not surprising if one considers the results of a recent government study in which a third of the 6,000 scientists at six of the nation’s top institutions admitted they had engaged in plagiarism or the outright fabrication of research data.

In another study of 32,000 scientists last summer by the China Association for Science and Technology, more than 55 percent said they knew someone guilty of academic fraud.

Fang Shimin, a muckraking writer who has become a well-known advocate for academic integrity, said the problem started with the state-run university system, where politically appointed bureaucrats have little expertise in the fields they oversee. Because competition for grants, housing perks and career advancement is so intense, officials base their decisions on the number of papers published.

“Even fake papers count because nobody actually reads them,”
said Mr. Fang, who is more widely known by his pen name, Fang Zhouzi, and whose Web site, New Threads, has exposed more than 900 instances of fakery, some involving university presidents and nationally lionized researchers.
 
All 3rd world nations have fraud and corruption. I think current 1st world nations like Japan, South Korea went through the same issues with corruption. It all depends on whether the corruption goes from being a small parasite to becoming a huge cancer where little of the $$ actually goes to the final project.

The so called example of fake medical cures are still prevalent in many first world nations. Many of the newest examples are claims that nutritional supplements can replace modern medicine. While nutritional supplements do little actual harm, a recipent can be lulled into thinking that they need not take the real prescribed medicine - that is the danger.

So I am doubtful if China is in a situation where corruption is detracting from the main goal.

Here is an interesting read:

Congrats, Mr Tata, but what have you done to rid India of corruption?Tarun Vijay
17 November 2010, 11:55 PM IST Share on Hotklix Share on Facebook Share on Yahoo Buzz! Hotklix Digg
Google Bookmarks StumbleUpon
Reddit Newsvine
Live Bookmarks Technorati
Yahoo Bookmarks Blogmarks
Del.icio.us ApnaCircle

In times of precipitated hate for one another among us Indians and the top court passing shocking insinuations against the Prime Minister’s office for virtually avoiding an inconvenient reply on the biggest loot of India, a Tata voice from my hometown, Dehradun, refreshed us all and gave hope.


I have read and distributed several copies of the book by Will Durant to friends about the loot that the British made. But the present regime and the political leaders of various parties shame the worst of the British looters. When a vibrant and youthful Barrack Obama interacted with our students, a Class X student of our tribal school (ititi.org), Dorjey, asked: Why can't our Prime Minister talk like this?


People who are 80-plus rule India, the youngest nation on this earth with 60% of its population under 40. We had the inspiring examples of "vanaprastha" (renouncing worldly pleasures after the body weakens and sons grow mature) in Dasharatha, for those who follow Rama, but I have seen that the more you grow in age, the more grows the desire for power.


The Tatas, who produce salt and railway engines and cars and solar power stations, could have refused a paltry Rs 15 crore bribe to a poor Indian minister and still survived. But the main "aparadh", or sin, that such highly placed, successful and respected icons of India commit, is what did they do to help India get rid of the ills that have pushed us back by at least 20 years in comparison with China and other developed countries?


Merely putting up a hundred profit-making ventures and spreading wings globally is not enough. Those who did it, whether the Tatas, Mittals, Azim Premjis or Ambanis, did it with the help of the people and the human resources produced by the same system that they call corrupt. What have the glitterati and the rich done to change the face of an India that showcases fatigued bodies and a de-Indianised elite ruling us?


Whether they are the Tatas or the Gandhi-era Birlas or other magnates of our industrial empires, they have proved the words of Swami Vivekananda that the rich can do no good to the nation. It’s only the poor, the middle class and the struggling masses who bring change in society and are ready to sacrifice their lives for the good of many.


The rich and the influential have always supported the status quo. The first stone to disturb the static pond was thrown by a shepherd, a common man.


Ratan Tata may not get huge crowds of politicians to cheer him. His official press release, a kind of apology for what he said in Dehradun, is evidence to it. Political prudence requires compromises. The Tata office needed that.


But, for God’s sake, what did he do to help India get rid of corruption? A nation is not just a conglomerate of material progress and buildings and factories and GDP graph. It’s the culture and the people's soul, reflecting the age-old civilizational moors that blend everything else into a nation.


What's that? And what has the Tata empire, in spite of its refusal to bribe a minister, done to nourish that ethos?


Those who take bribes and put hurdles in the path of an honest Tata are surely destined to go to the dustbin of history. Nobody is ever going to remember them as rememberables. A rich person is remembered because he helped millions, and not because he earned a lot.


The Tatas have surely made our heads rise high by refusing to bribe a minister to get their work done. But they are citizens of a country where the common man has to give bribes to get a residential certificate or a caste certificate.


The India of the Tatats, the honest and great entrepreneurs, is reeling under unprecedented corruption cases — CWG, 2G spectrum, Adrash housing society.


But please go to your town and ask the patwari, the juniour enginner, the lekhpal, the minicipal councillor, the MLA, the MP, the most honouranle people in society, and get the figures of the bribe they take to get things done.


The tragedy that has occurred in Delhi, the collapse of a building, couldn’t have occurred without the active connivance of the enginners, policemen and politicians.


Sixty-six people died in that building collapse.


Isn’t it a case of murder of those 66 people by the authorities responsible for sanctioning further construction on a dilapidated structure?


What have the Tatas, the Bajajes or the Mittals done to help stem the rot?


What about the Indian who survives on dal-roti and a little bit of culture? The India that creates the kumbh, without government support? The Indian who sustains the threads of tolerance and amity in a jungle of hate and intolerance?


I am sorry, a great-sounding Tata or a self-assured Bajaj or Birlas have done hardly anything mentionable in that direction.


For them, investment is good only if it pays rich dividends to their companies. And not necessarily to India.
 
Rampant Fraud Threat to China’s Ascent
By ANDREW JACOBS
Published: October 6, 2010

BEIJING — No one disputes Zhang Wuben’s talents as a salesman. Through television shows, DVDs and a best-selling book, he convinced millions of people that raw eggplant and immense quantities of mung beans could cure lupus, diabetes, depression and cancer.

For $450, seriously ill patients could buy a 10-minute consultation and a prescription — except Mr. Zhang, one of the most popular practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine, was booked through 2012.

But when the price of mung beans skyrocketed this spring, Chinese journalists began digging deeper. They learned that contrary to his claims, Mr. Zhang, 47, was not from a long line of doctors (his father was a weaver). Nor did he earn a degree from Beijing Medical University (his only formal education, it turned out, was the brief correspondence course he took after losing his job at a textile mill).

The exposure of Mr. Zhang’s faked credentials provoked a fresh round of hand-wringing over what many scholars and Chinese complain are the dishonest practices that permeate society, including students who cheat on college entrance exams, scholars who promote fake or unoriginal research, and dairy companies that sell poisoned milk to infants.

The most recent string of revelations has been bracing. After a plane crash in August killed 42 people in northeast China, officials discovered that 100 pilots who worked for the airline’s parent company had falsified their flying histories.

Then there was the padded résumé of Tang Jun, the millionaire former head of Microsoft China and something of a national hero, who falsely claimed to have received a doctorate from the California Institute of Technology.


Plagiarism and Fakery

Her findings are not surprising if one considers the results of a recent government study in which a third of the 6,000 scientists at six of the nation’s top institutions admitted they had engaged in plagiarism or the outright fabrication of research data.

In another study of 32,000 scientists last summer by the China Association for Science and Technology, more than 55 percent said they knew someone guilty of academic fraud.

Fang Shimin, a muckraking writer who has become a well-known advocate for academic integrity, said the problem started with the state-run university system, where politically appointed bureaucrats have little expertise in the fields they oversee. Because competition for grants, housing perks and career advancement is so intense, officials base their decisions on the number of papers published.

“Even fake papers count because nobody actually reads them,”
said Mr. Fang, who is more widely known by his pen name, Fang Zhouzi, and whose Web site, New Threads, has exposed more than 900 instances of fakery, some involving university presidents and nationally lionized researchers.

China rich businessman donate millions to U.S Yale University instead of his own motherland China University.Why he did that?Watch and you will know...

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fw3063ZnXfQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fw3063ZnXfQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 
In the early 70s Japan had its scandals with PM Tanaka. And this is corruption from the top. Corruption is a rite of passage for countries as the move from 3rd to 1st world.

The keypoint to whether, despite the corruption, the country is able to implement the key projects that will move the country ahead. You can have a situation when corruption is so rampant that there is insufficient funds to complete the project or the projects do not have a purpose that benefit the country.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kakuei_Tanaka

I think rich individuals should contribute towards their causes. It is fine if they donate to Yale. The businessman who donated close to $9M to Yale is based in Beijing making his $ from the vibrant Chinese economy. He has every rich to donate to a worthy cause plus it reserves a space in Yale for his future kids.

We have seen many newly rich Chinese millionaires actively engaged in philantropy - that is a good thing. Must better than the rich that throw weddings costing $100m (Mittal) or build themselves a $1B personal home.
 
Last edited:
But when the price of mung beans skyrocketed this spring, Chinese journalists began digging deeper. They learned that contrary to his claims, Mr. Zhang, 47, was not from a long line of doctors (his father was a weaver). Nor did he earn a degree from Beijing Medical University (his only formal education, it turned out, was the brief correspondence course he took after losing his job at a textile mill).

The exposure of Mr. Zhang’s faked credentials provoked a fresh round of hand-wringing over what many scholars and Chinese complain are the dishonest practices that permeate society, including students who cheat on college entrance exams, scholars who promote fake or unoriginal research, and dairy companies that sell poisoned milk to infants.

The most recent string of revelations has been bracing. After a plane crash in August killed 42 people in northeast China, officials discovered that 100 pilots who worked for the airline’s parent company had falsified their flying histories.

Then there was the padded résumé of Tang Jun, the millionaire former head of Microsoft China and something of a national hero, who falsely claimed to have received a doctorate from the California Institute of Technology.

Why chinks like to cheat? Face har... show off your chinky face har...
 

I think it is great that such fraud is exposed over the net. As mentioned all 3rd world nations have their issues with fraud not to mentioned 1st world nations (Madoff). Fake degrees, fake experiments (remember the fake Pons - cold fusion claim?).

While one must be careful when it comes to blogs - anyone can start a blog, sunlight is the best.

However, I do not think that fraud is going to prevent the growth of China. I think there are many nations with much worse case of fraud; this hits especially hard if the country cannot afford the cost of such corruption/fraud.
 
I think it is great that such fraud is exposed over the net. As mentioned all 3rd world nations have their issues with fraud not to mentioned 1st world nations (Madoff). Fake degrees, fake experiments (remember the fake Pons - cold fusion claim?).
.


Sporeans know alot about 'fake' talents :rolleyes:

We are paying millions & millions to so called fake talents. Even though their paper qualifications might be genuine, their performance & motives are suspect.

What we need is a "system" to weed out these fake talents. Unfortunately the Spore System has never worked because of some old leaf:)
 
Rampant Fraud Threat to China’s Ascent
By ANDREW JACOBS
Published: October 6, 2010

BEIJING — No one disputes Zhang Wuben’s talents as a salesman. Through television shows, DVDs and a best-selling book, he convinced millions of people that raw eggplant and immense quantities of mung beans could cure lupus, diabetes, depression and cancer.

For $450, seriously ill patients could buy a 10-minute consultation and a prescription — except Mr. Zhang, one of the most popular practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine, was booked through 2012.

But when the price of mung beans skyrocketed this spring, Chinese journalists began digging deeper. They learned that contrary to his claims, Mr. Zhang, 47, was not from a long line of doctors (his father was a weaver). Nor did he earn a degree from Beijing Medical University (his only formal education, it turned out, was the brief correspondence course he took after losing his job at a textile mill).

The exposure of Mr. Zhang’s faked credentials provoked a fresh round of hand-wringing over what many scholars and Chinese complain are the dishonest practices that permeate society, including students who cheat on college entrance exams, scholars who promote fake or unoriginal research, and dairy companies that sell poisoned milk to infants.

The most recent string of revelations has been bracing. After a plane crash in August killed 42 people in northeast China, officials discovered that 100 pilots who worked for the airline’s parent company had falsified their flying histories.

Then there was the padded résumé of Tang Jun, the millionaire former head of Microsoft China and something of a national hero, who falsely claimed to have received a doctorate from the California Institute of Technology.


Plagiarism and Fakery

Her findings are not surprising if one considers the results of a recent government study in which a third of the 6,000 scientists at six of the nation’s top institutions admitted they had engaged in plagiarism or the outright fabrication of research data.

In another study of 32,000 scientists last summer by the China Association for Science and Technology, more than 55 percent said they knew someone guilty of academic fraud.

Fang Shimin, a muckraking writer who has become a well-known advocate for academic integrity, said the problem started with the state-run university system, where politically appointed bureaucrats have little expertise in the fields they oversee. Because competition for grants, housing perks and career advancement is so intense, officials base their decisions on the number of papers published.

“Even fake papers count because nobody actually reads them,”
said Mr. Fang, who is more widely known by his pen name, Fang Zhouzi, and whose Web site, New Threads, has exposed more than 900 instances of fakery, some involving university presidents and nationally lionized researchers.

ting over parliamentary impasse

Module body

38 minutes ago

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Indian government and opposition parties will meet on Tuesday to try again to break a deadlock in parliament that has stalled passage of key legislation, an official said on Sunday.
ADVERTISEMENT

The opposition has halted parliament sessions since November 9 over its demand for a joint parliamentary committee (JPC) probe into a corruption scandal that a government auditor said could have cost the nation up to $39 billion in revenue and has triggered the resignation of the telecoms minister.

The speaker of the powerful lower house of India's parliament called for an all-party meeting at 1:30 pm (3 a.m. EST) on Tuesday, an official at the speaker's office told Reuters. "All the floor leaders will be present at the meeting," he said.

But any breakthrough in the meeting was unlikely, with the government refusing to bend to opposition pressure for a joint investigation into the alleged telecoms scam.

"We are willing (to have a) discussion and (to pass) all bills listed for the session, but first and foremost the government should constitute a JPC," said S.S. Ahluwalia, a senior leader of the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party.

The meeting was originally scheduled for 4 pm (1030 GMT) on Monday, but Ahluwalia had said his party's leaders would be out of town and were willing to consider a meeting later.

Key bills, including one for approval of an extra $9.8 billion in spending to ensure functioning of government machinery, are pending before the parliament. [nSGE6AO06A]

The current session is scheduled to run until Dec 13. But if the logjam continues, there could be an early adjournment.

The government has refused to accept opposition demands, saying a separate investigation is under way.

The ruling Congress party has come up with a few proposals to overcome the impasse, including an investigation monitored by the Supreme Court, but the opposition has rejected them.

On Sunday, senior Congress leader and Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee spoke to leaders in the main opposition in another effort to find a compromise, to no avail.

"Our stand is very clear. We have said that there is no question of a JPC. But it is for the government to take a decision," said a Congress leader who did not want to be named.

(Reporting by C.J. Kuncheria and Nigam Prusty; writing by Devidutta Tripathy; editing by Mark Heinrich)
 
Back
Top