- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,580
- Points
- 0
What I am driving at is that certain types of irritating behaviour are more likely to be commited by Chinese Ah Peks than other types of humans. Whether it is called "tradition" or whatever crap is besides the point. Dressing style is another criteria used in profiling in addition to race. It would fall under the rubric of "social class" together with other factors such as venue. Of course, all of these are politically incorrect but I don't care!
One shitskin placing a dog on a table does not a tradition make. Nine Cina Ah Peks sneezing like thunder in public places makes one want to avoid them regardless of the root cause of such behaviour or the danger that some moron concerned with political correctness will instinctively shout racist nor whether it can be properly labelled a tradition or not. Able to appreciate the difference?
Alamak just admit you posted wrongly about a certain behavior and wrongly named it chinese tradition.
Also how come placing the dog is only a single incident of that and you call it chinese tradition because you assumed it was a chinese who did that but the minute you got found out that you are wrong and a shit skin actually did it isn't a shit skin tradition? Care to explain the double standards here?
I reiterate again. It is only a single incident. You called it a chinese tradition to place a dog on a table like emperor qian long since you assumed it was a chinese that did it but the moment found out it's a shit skin it isn't a shit skin tradition. So why the bias?