Dont need to wait 5 to 10yrs, the PAP cud always change the law tmr and you can bet your last dollar that the Opposition in lamparliment will not make a sound on it.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
NMP Chia Yong Yong: CPF Is Not Your Money, You Cannot Call The Shots
- Thread starter xingguy
- Start date
Or she was doing it under specific instructions of her masters. After all, people tend to give the wheelchair folks the benefit of the doubt. Let a 'neutral' NMP take the heat. What better way to shield your nefarious political intentions behind a paraplegic? They had already done a similar thing using Down's Syndrome kids as 'shields' at Hong Lim Park.
Oh it is chilling to know that pre-consultation was actually made before her speech and praise given on such speech by prime minister. So in the name of being responsible and not become liability to the state, our money in CPF become not sure whether belong to us?
They might as well say for the citizens to be even more responsible to the state, our money in bank account also not sure whether belong to us. All chiong kong the best! The govt will take all our bank money too to manage and give out a monthly amount so that the citizen will not anyhow spend and become liability to the state.
Last edited:
Damn it ...we don't own our pigeon hole even though we pay so much for it, we own our car for only ten years even though we pay obscene amount for it and now we don't own our CPF money.
What's next?
What's next?
Tan Choon Hong:
March 9, 2015 at 4:45 pm (Quote)
Could the PAP be adopting a new strategy to test the waters before legislating controversial policies like perhaps “CPF money is not yours”?
First, get someone with a silver tongue and powerful oratory skills to put out a statement since the ministers are known to be deficient in communications skills as seen in the gutter-style English used when attacking the WP over TC management. Then get all the eunuchs praising in unison including government funded academics, followed by whipping the MSM into a frenzy to megaphone the policy in print, on air, online and offline.
If the proposal creates a backlash, it is quickly but quietly withdrawn. But if it gains traction, the top man steps forward to take the credit, and without further ado, it is steamrolled through parliament via their lineup of eunuchs.
March 9, 2015 at 4:45 pm (Quote)
Could the PAP be adopting a new strategy to test the waters before legislating controversial policies like perhaps “CPF money is not yours”?
First, get someone with a silver tongue and powerful oratory skills to put out a statement since the ministers are known to be deficient in communications skills as seen in the gutter-style English used when attacking the WP over TC management. Then get all the eunuchs praising in unison including government funded academics, followed by whipping the MSM into a frenzy to megaphone the policy in print, on air, online and offline.
If the proposal creates a backlash, it is quickly but quietly withdrawn. But if it gains traction, the top man steps forward to take the credit, and without further ado, it is steamrolled through parliament via their lineup of eunuchs.
Yes they can change the law tomorrow if they want....but pls dun blame the opposition.....it's the dumbfucks 60.1% who gave the vile pappies a blank cheque.....
You send in a few brave gladiators to fight against an army.....dun expect them to win
After Chia's speech, PAP MPs/Ministers were seen thumping at their chair armrest in unison in approval.
From Pinkie's CPF con-game latest twist, I dare say that they don't have sufficient funds to pay back to the peoples' CPF savings.
Jiak liao bee Tony Tan when he was Chairman of GIC he lost US$42 billion in 2008/2009.
Whore Jinx also lost S$40 billion for Temasek in 2009.
The Whore made further losses amounting to billions in Energy and Resource investments.
They are so fucking desperate, they may even change the constitution to allow PRs to vote in the coming GE.
NMP supposed to be apolitical, think again.
Pinky says that she makes an excellent speech.
..............
I personally think these scums have been around since time memorial. They have been just been more actively deployed because PAP have been getting heat from all ends and they cannot afford another debacle.
As for your point on intrusion, it is not about the intrusion or change of policy, but more like the well is dry and they need more money. For the fact that there doesn't appear to have anyone with a sense of morality within the party to stop these raids, it has evolved like a virus.
Whether the Pappy needs more money or not, as individual you should NOT be concerning yourself about it.
YOU should be the one making money from your CPF when the sun shines instead of harping about it being returned!
YOU should be the one making huge loads of money DURING YOUR PRODUCTIVE years of your life instead of lazing around and passing the time.
As a matter of fact, only LOSERS keep harping about this CPF money cos ..
IF you are a winner in LIfE, you really got no time to even want to know whether or how much money it is in there (CPF). Treat it as some sort of petty cash that will return if it ever comes back.
Oh you can't . I forgot. You are a loser in life.LoL
Perhaps. But whichever way you look at it, she is still trying to get into the good (or better) books of the establishment/pap. 
Sure thing. Whatever gets you off.
Another example of why the NMP scheme is a waste of taxpayers monies and against democratic principles-she did not stand and fight for her seat in a free and fair elections and therefore has no right to speak in parliament.
Even kids understand such simple logic as seen in voting for class monitors, students councillors ect2.
Even kids understand such simple logic as seen in voting for class monitors, students councillors ect2.
Last edited:
Similar threads
